General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBut this is the exact reason why religion should be kept out of the election . . .
The concern among evangelicals is that the Mormon Church will use his position around the world as a calling card for legitimizing their church and proselytizing people.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/us/politics/evangelical-christians-unease-with-romney-is-theological.html?_r=1&hp
It's a Chief Executive whose religious sponsors will use his/her position to promote their religion as government policy which may include benefit to that religion or discrimination against those groups and individuals not in their religion.
The Evangelicals would not be "concerned" if their guy/gal were in the White House.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)They just want to stop others from doing what they want to do.
CanonRay
(14,101 posts)The usually crazy evangelicals are right on this one.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)And the evangelicals were all for it.
Solly Mack
(90,765 posts)Initech
(100,068 posts)I am 1000000000000% against a new constituional convention for this very reason. I'm tired of how every politician ever has to court the evangelical vote. This is dangerous.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)and the Catholic Church did before with Kennedy (although some would argue that the Catholic Church is only illegitimate in the Southern Bible Belt). That will be an obvious outcome.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)When it was Bush, it was A-OK.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Seriously though, this why we need separation of church & state.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Charlemagne
(576 posts)or they do and dont care because THEIR one view is the ONLY right view. Everything else (constitution, other peoples rights) is just an obstacle to their goal