Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TheBeam19

(344 posts)
4. I have seen one new talking point today.
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 03:33 PM
Aug 2022

It goes something like this:

“If these documents contained such sensitive secrets, why are they now posted on the internet?”

So dumb. You can’t read any of the actual content in the photographed documents that were part of the DOJ filing last night.

TheRealNorth

(9,647 posts)
5. Blah blah something Hunter Biden
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 03:36 PM
Aug 2022

Blah blah something Hillary Clinton

Blah blah something inflation.

But I hear they are gearing up for Caravan Watch just in time for November.

uponit7771

(93,491 posts)
6. Clinton did it with a 2012 Jackson ruling in favor of Clinton that leaves out the fact 1. Clinton ..
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 03:37 PM
Aug 2022

... notified the NARA
2. In 2018 Judge Andrew Carter ruled even a public announcement of declassification isn't sufficient to declassify documents.
3. TFG isn't declaring any of the documents the FBI retrieved as being personal or classified.

uponit7771

(93,491 posts)
10. +1, saw that ... like ... ignore the tacky assed rug and the "Secret" in red on all the folders
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 03:41 PM
Aug 2022

skip fox

(19,502 posts)
11. Cavoto had a guest on who he agreed with: It's not that big of thing, basically.
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 03:43 PM
Aug 2022

But even if it is, DOJ can't treat him a normal because of the public's likely reaction. So they should drop it. ("Unless there's really something explosive in there&quot .

Mr. Ected

(9,713 posts)
14. The Court of Public Opinion has no courtroom and no prisons for the convicted
Wed Aug 31, 2022, 04:56 PM
Aug 2022

What we hear on the telly means absolutely zilch. Let them flap their gums and expose their ignorance.

In the meantime, I'll listen to ex-federal prosecutors explain the finer details and await the true jurisprudence.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»what's the latest maga-fo...