Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Justice Department's case for obstruction at Mar-a-Lago is growing stronger
It looks like Trump and others knew what he had, knew where it was, and knew not all of it had been returned.Sept. 1, 2022, 5:56 AM EDT
By Frank Figliuzzi, MSNBC Opinion Columnist
After the Department of Justices 36-page response to former President Donald Trumps request for a special master to review material the FBI seized from his home, we could be inching close to someone, maybe Trump himself, being charged with obstruction of justice. Tuesdays well-crafted objections to Trumps request constitute a simple, yet persuasive, smackdown of the Trump teams flawed legal logic. There were a number of eyebrow-raising revelations by DOJ, but more important was the departments subtle but sustained theme of obstruction.
snip
The DOJs assertions seem to make a case for both the knowing concealment and the intent to impede requirements for obstruction. But if those elements are satisfied, who could be charged and based on what conduct? Well, The Washington Post reports that Trump attorney Christina Bobb told the newspaper that Trump lawyers showed federal officials the boxes in the storage room and that Jay Bratt, chief of the Justice Departments Counterintelligence and Export Control Section, spent time looking through them. That sounds like a direct contradiction of the DOJs claim that Trump's team denied a request from government officials to enter the storage room and check for documents.
snip
The DOJ filing also takes issue with the claim that Trump declassified by standing order all the seized documents when he was president. DOJ points out that neither counsel nor the custodian asserted that the former President had declassified the documents or asserted any claim of privilege. Over a dozen former Trump officials have disputed the notion that there was a standing order to declassify whatever Trump wanted. That could mean that former Trump adviser Kash Patel is in trouble. Its Patel who has claimed he can personally attest to Trumps standing order defense. Time will tell whos telling the truth, but if the FBI were to develop evidence that Patel and Trump conspired to concoct a phony standing order defense, then they could be charged.
snip
Increasingly, it looks like Trump and others knew what he had, knew where it was, and knew not all of it had been returned. The questions they should now be asking themselves include, How much more does DOJ know, and how many of us are going to be charged?
Full article
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 696 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Justice Department's case for obstruction at Mar-a-Lago is growing stronger (Original Post)
catbyte
Sep 2022
OP
Wounded Bear
(58,685 posts)1. K & R...nt
underpants
(182,861 posts)2. Maybe Trump had these documents as part of his stable genius plan
to win the Nobel Peace Prize he so richly thinks he deserves.