Update: The New York Times is, atm, projecting the House at 229 Rethugs, 203 Dems

[Celerity]

Last edited Tue Nov 8, 2022, 10:48 PM - Edit history (1)

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/11/08/us/elections/results-needle-forecast.html

[Polybius]

1. Yikes

How about the Senate?

[Celerity]

3. Pure toss-up atm

[DestinyIsles]

2. wow 29 seats

not over but not good so far

[W_HAMILTON]

6. No. Bad math.

Republicans currently have 212 seats (https://pressgallery.house.gov/member-data/party-breakdown), so, 232 seats would be a pickup of 20 seats.

[DestinyIsles]

7. oops your right

[Beautiful Disaster]

4. That would be less than their majorities after the 2010 and 2014 midterms.

Not quite a wave year but a majority is a majority.

[Ace Rothstein]

10. All the gerrymandering means more guaranteed seats and fewer toss-ups.

The number of competitive congressional districts has to be at an all-time low.

[ananda]

5. Good god! an endless shitskow now.

Sheesh!

[Celerity]

8. Empty G and Lil Gunny Bobo running riot, arrrrf

[WarGamer]

9. better than 240... I don't want to see a crushing loss.

[CentralMass]

11. Fock.

[roamer65]

12. Fucking gerrymandering.

[BlueIdaho]

13. Simple enough

They don’t know what they are talking about.

[Celerity]

14. update