General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt's ok to admit liking Dilbert cartoons again?
I just saw the news that Scott Adams (the Dilbert cartoonist) is finally fed up with Trump's nonsense. It took him long enough.
The story is at https://www.rawstory.com/scott-adams-trump/.
Gore1FL
(22,937 posts)Scott Adams is tragically someone I would never associate with.
Amishman
(5,928 posts)As someone who has made a career in various IT roles, I'm definitely in the core target audience for his brand of office humor
MagickMuffin
(18,315 posts)So, were good!
MLAA
(19,723 posts)marble falls
(71,724 posts)... was decent person, but he is a RW jackass. Dilbert is still funny.
Jirel
(2,369 posts)Just because he is starting to walk away from Dump, doesnt me he isnt still a full bore crazy fascist. But just like its fine to like Harry Potter as long as the author gets none of your money, its ok to enjoy Dilbert under the same rules.
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)walkingman
(10,734 posts)MichMan
(17,081 posts)Earth-shine
(4,044 posts)maxsolomon
(38,580 posts)However, back in 2016 I heard an interview with him (on Bill Maher?) where he discussed Trump's campaign rhetoric. Adams specifically linked it to Con Artist techniques.
Simplistic mnemonic devices, consonant-heavy catchphrases and dehumanizing nicknames (Crazy Bernie, Crooked Hillary, Sleepy Joe, etc.), negative framing, repetition, repetition, repetition.
Adams probably enjoyed it as a troll or from a policy perspective. It made me lose even more respect for Repukes, because they're the ones it worked on (as well as Low-Information dumbfucks who vote).