General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObamacare discrimination protections don't apply to LGBT patients, Texas judge rules
No paywall
https://archive.ph/k5T3g
AUSTIN A federal judge in Texas has ruled that the Biden administration cannot prohibit doctors from denying certain medical care based on a patients sexual orientation and gender identity.
U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk on Friday sided with two Texas doctors who sued to block a federal rule that barred discrimination against LGBT patients. Susan Neese, an Amarillo doctor who refuses to prescribe hormone therapy to minors with gender dysphoria, argued that sex discrimination is defined as different treatment given to men and women not different treatment given based on patients sexuality or gender identity.
Kacsmaryk went a step further, ruling that a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision protecting LGBT workers does not apply to decisions in the health care setting. The breadth of his decision sets up bigger arguments to come in the courts and legislatures over who is protected and what counts as discrimination in the doctors office.
When adopting [the Affordable Care Act], Congress could have included sexual orientation and gender identity in the statutory text. Congress chose not to do so. Instead, Congress limited [the ACAs] protections to those afforded by other federal statutes including Title IX, he wrote. Because Title IX does not protect sexual orientation or gender identity status, neither does [the ACA].
*snip*
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Can men get treatment for prostate problems? Women don't, so men shouldn't either, according to this "logic."
Solly Mack
(96,429 posts)sakabatou
(45,799 posts)Deuxcents
(25,598 posts)What BS. Will those exempt be exempt from taxes n healthcare premiums? Ok..right..