General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Hobby Lobby leak looks bad for Justice Alito. But that's not the worst part.
Democratic lawmakers are calling for an investigation following a New York Times report that in 2014, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito divulged the outcome of a closely watched religious freedom case, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, during a dinner with an evangelical activist before the decision came down.
Alito denies the claim, but Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said the committee is reviewing these serious allegations. Determining whether Alito revealed the Hobby Lobby outcome is important, but it wont solve the courts most serious problem: While it claims to be a nonpartisan, neutral arbiter of the law, its conservative majority was deliberately cultivated to expand religious freedom for conservative Christians at the expense of the rights of those deemed less worthy of protection.
The possible revelation of the Hobby Lobby decision in which the court held that private corporations can demand religious exemptions from the Affordable Care Acts requirement that employer health plans cover contraceptives is the second Supreme Court leak in the news this year. The other involved an even greater victory for the religious right: the unsolved mystery of who leaked a draft of the decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization, overturning the right to an abortion. Both rulings were penned by Alito.
The heart of the Times story is that the alleged leak enabled the Rev. Rob Schenck, at the time a Capitol Hill-based conduit between evangelical donors and top political players, to help Hobby Lobby craft a public relations campaign ahead of the decision. The focus on his efforts, while an interesting look inside the operations of one (now repentant) activist, obscures the much larger scope and scale of the broader Christian rights fundraising, activism and litigation over the past four decades.
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/hobby-lobby-leak-looks-bad-justice-alito-not-worst-part-rcna58360
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)ck4829
(35,076 posts)Then I would say "not guilty" if I was on a jury.
There's video evidence - "not guilty"
There's three witnesses - "not guilty"
It's the law - "not guilty"
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)Everytime they undermine another democratic institution they move the USA one step closer to Authoritarian Rule.
This is designed behavior - it is not serendipitous.
The only real remedy is to keep shining the light of publicity on the RW criminal, immoral, undemocratic, and unethical activities.
In the long run they will fail and be remembered as traitors to humanity. That's a fact.
Orrex
(63,212 posts)machoneman
(4,007 posts)...and hopefully the backlash to Robert's court will further stain him and his fellow R's forever as THE worst SC ever.
Hes the only one making the claim.
Indict him for what?
GB_RN
(2,355 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:55 AM - Edit history (1)
Send him to jail for what and why?
Rulings that leak early from the SCOTUS are unethical at worst (and perhaps subject to disbarment as a result of said unethical behavior), but theres nothing illegal about them, unfortunately. But that would be on Alito, not the reverend. We all know that Alito is basically untouchable, anyway. I doubt even the Bar Association would deal with him over it.
stopdiggin
(11,308 posts)There is a possible issue of ethics. But, even then - only as defined by the court (and individual justice?) itself.
But - on the 'public perceptions' and public confidence flank ... Remember the good old days when we were all hoppin' mad about those 'durn "activist judges?"
Good times!
Gary 50
(381 posts)Ha Ha Ha. Yes it looks so bad he won't be leaving the court until he dies. Nothing he or any of the other rightwing assholes could do would end in their successful impeachment. Nothing! Only God could remove a fascist from the supreme court and he doesn't seem to be in the mood.
live love laugh
(13,109 posts)Zambero
(8,964 posts)Then we'll get a repeat performance from Alito, smugly moving his head back and forth in denial as he once did with Obama. Yes, as the "justice" once proved, it is very possible to lie with one's body language.
tritsofme
(17,378 posts)Harker
(14,018 posts)as expanding religious dominion.
Suppression of others freedoms.
Scrivener7
(50,949 posts)And he'll trash the rule of law with wild abandon for a few more decades.
live love laugh
(13,109 posts)karin_sj
(810 posts)From the president, to the senators, to the representatives, to the newscasters, and the Supreme Court. They think they're untouchable.
EndlessWire
(6,531 posts)People have been sentenced to jail for that, you know.
I think the fact that he leaked it (allegedly) is worse because things are always a two way street, and it implies that he can be influenced.
Samrob
(4,298 posts)rights and in come cases health and benefits.