Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ck4829

(35,076 posts)
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 07:53 AM Nov 2022

The Hobby Lobby leak looks bad for Justice Alito. But that's not the worst part.

Democratic lawmakers are calling for an investigation following a New York Times report that in 2014, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito divulged the outcome of a closely watched religious freedom case, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, during a dinner with an evangelical activist before the decision came down.

Alito denies the claim, but Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said the committee is reviewing “these serious allegations.” Determining whether Alito revealed the Hobby Lobby outcome is important, but it won’t solve the court’s most serious problem: While it claims to be a nonpartisan, neutral arbiter of the law, its conservative majority was deliberately cultivated to expand religious freedom for conservative Christians at the expense of the rights of those deemed less worthy of protection.

The possible revelation of the Hobby Lobby decision — in which the court held that private corporations can demand religious exemptions from the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that employer health plans cover contraceptives — is the second Supreme Court leak in the news this year. The other involved an even greater victory for the religious right: the unsolved mystery of who leaked a draft of the decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, overturning the right to an abortion. Both rulings were penned by Alito.

The heart of the Times story is that the alleged leak enabled the Rev. Rob Schenck, at the time a Capitol Hill-based conduit between evangelical donors and top political players, to help Hobby Lobby craft a public relations campaign ahead of the decision. The focus on his efforts, while an interesting look inside the operations of one (now repentant) activist, obscures the much larger scope and scale of the broader Christian right’s fundraising, activism and litigation over the past four decades.

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/hobby-lobby-leak-looks-bad-justice-alito-not-worst-part-rcna58360

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ck4829

(35,076 posts)
2. We do have a defense too. If something's now illegal because of Alito and the dominionists
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 08:02 AM
Nov 2022

Then I would say "not guilty" if I was on a jury.

There's video evidence - "not guilty"
There's three witnesses - "not guilty"
It's the law - "not guilty"

Tommymac

(7,263 posts)
11. In reality the result is loss of confidence in the Institution of the SC; a win for Christofascism
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:54 AM
Nov 2022

Everytime they undermine another democratic institution they move the USA one step closer to Authoritarian Rule.

This is designed behavior - it is not serendipitous.

The only real remedy is to keep shining the light of publicity on the RW criminal, immoral, undemocratic, and unethical activities.

In the long run they will fail and be remembered as traitors to humanity. That's a fact.



machoneman

(4,007 posts)
4. Indict Rev. Rob, make him squeal or send him to jail! He'll talk....
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 09:58 AM
Nov 2022

...and hopefully the backlash to Robert's court will further stain him and his fellow R's forever as THE worst SC ever.

GB_RN

(2,355 posts)
6. Indict For What?
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:14 AM
Nov 2022

Last edited Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:55 AM - Edit history (1)

Send him to jail for what and why?

Rulings that leak early from the SCOTUS are unethical at worst (and perhaps subject to disbarment as a result of said unethical behavior), but there’s nothing illegal about them, unfortunately. But that would be on Alito, not the reverend. We all know that Alito is basically untouchable, anyway. I doubt even the Bar Association would deal with him over it.

stopdiggin

(11,308 posts)
16. +1. there is no infringement of law
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 01:27 PM
Nov 2022

There is a possible issue of ethics. But, even then - only as defined by the court (and individual justice?) itself.

But - on the 'public perceptions' and public confidence flank ... Remember the good old days when we were all hoppin' mad about those 'durn "activist judges?"
Good times!

Gary 50

(381 posts)
7. "Looks bad for Justice Alito"
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:22 AM
Nov 2022

Ha Ha Ha. Yes it looks so bad he won't be leaving the court until he dies. Nothing he or any of the other rightwing assholes could do would end in their successful impeachment. Nothing! Only God could remove a fascist from the supreme court and he doesn't seem to be in the mood.

Zambero

(8,964 posts)
8. Biden should slip that into the State of the Union address come January
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:26 AM
Nov 2022

Then we'll get a repeat performance from Alito, smugly moving his head back and forth in denial as he once did with Obama. Yes, as the "justice" once proved, it is very possible to lie with one's body language.

Harker

(14,018 posts)
9. I don't view the court as "expanding religious freedom", but rather
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:38 AM
Nov 2022

as expanding religious dominion.

Scrivener7

(50,949 posts)
10. Nothing will happen to him.
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 10:50 AM
Nov 2022

And he'll trash the rule of law with wild abandon for a few more decades.

karin_sj

(810 posts)
12. They just lie with impunity
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 11:35 AM
Nov 2022

From the president, to the senators, to the representatives, to the newscasters, and the Supreme Court. They think they're untouchable.

EndlessWire

(6,531 posts)
15. The Insider Leak
Sat Nov 26, 2022, 12:03 PM
Nov 2022

People have been sentenced to jail for that, you know.

I think the fact that he leaked it (allegedly) is worse because things are always a two way street, and it implies that he can be influenced.

Samrob

(4,298 posts)
18. We're paying taxes so that tax exempt religious organizations can spend our money to deny some of us
Sun Nov 27, 2022, 01:06 AM
Nov 2022

rights and in come cases health and benefits.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Hobby Lobby leak look...