General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI just wish we here at DU and the media would stop posting/ talking about filthy rich billionaires
as though they were victims of something. Who the fuck cares what is happening to them in their money deals? They throw away money in a day that some families will never make in two generations. Fuck them and the Tweet they rode in on.
Initech
(100,123 posts)Ocelot II
(115,932 posts)Initech
(100,123 posts)orthoclad
(2,910 posts)His total wealth was just under $200B last time I looked.
Imagine $44B as play money! I think twice to buy a cheesesteak.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,167 posts)Can you blame them? His hubris is gonna bit him hard. I hope.
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-11-14/elon-musk-toxic-boss-timeline
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)Their reputation is damaged, both tech and social. Stock is falling. Competition is getting fierce. I feel bad for their REAL engineers who worked hard to advance the EV.
I know of at least one Tesla/EV fan who got rid of it and swore he'd never buy another. Reich wing boogaloo bois aren't buying EV's. He's playing for the "rolling coal" crowd.
ProfessorGAC
(65,325 posts)I read that his effective tax rate on accumulated wealth was under 3%.
He didn't need a tax write-off.
He's simply screwing up.
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)Or is there a darker current in there?
I think both.
He's certainly thriving on attention.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,167 posts)rubbersole
(6,748 posts)They paid for the tax code to be written to benefit themselves. It's working.
usonian
(9,928 posts)https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=17413975
After having had a brief post-midterm respite.
Too often, we have let the crazies set the talking points, but we have won by owning the conversation.
Their craziness and acts of selfishness, cruelty and violence should be seen as ways to turn people away from the cult, and get some good old "Republicans in Disarray" in motion.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/11/27/2138407/-Once-a-Rightwing-center-CO-Springs-now-a-pale-shade-of-purple-GOP-pivoting-from-the-Q-Club-massacre
Once a Rightwing center, CO Springs now a pale shade of purple GOP pivoting from the Q-Club massacre
A smartly orchestrated plan rightly paints the GQP as NOTHING BUT purveyors of obstructionism, oligarchs, twisted myths, treason, violence, insurrection and cruelty
Maestro Arturo Dark Brandonini will conduct as the right-wingers hack themselves to pieces.
Result:
OUT WITH JUDGES STILL CHORTLING OVER THE SALEM WITCH TRIALS AND THE SPANISH INQUISITION.
OUT WITH CITIZENS UNITED
OUT WITH GRIFT AND GRAFT AND CAMPAIGN BILLIONS
Remember, the 30's gangsters did not rub each other out, as some hoped they would, but their extreme violence put many away and turned society against them. Sound familiar?
working on memes.
Tetrachloride
(7,894 posts)Lithos
(26,404 posts)However, the "as though they were victims" is spot on.
The only billionaire who I think is a victim is possibly Soros. The cause is all the conspiracy theories against him.
brooklynite
(94,879 posts)Orrex
(63,255 posts)Seeking Serenity
(2,840 posts)Not as in shouldn't be allowed to physically exist, i.e. live, duh. I mean there shouldn't be classes of people that are millionaires or billionaires. If your net worth is above $999,999.99, then everything above that goes to helping the poor.
ironman99
(99 posts)I am one of those whose net worth is >$999,999.99. One third is a house that is completely paid for, the other funds my retirement. Why should I either sell my house or get rid of my retirement for some arbitrary number that you don't like?
Seeking Serenity
(2,840 posts)You sleep well with all your wealth while children in this country go to bed hungry and feel good about yourself, y'hear?
tritsofme
(17,421 posts)Your arbitrary number is ridiculous.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(517 posts)IMO, most believe that there should be more material things for some than for others.
Many, I believe, would say capitalism with some guardrails is the best system yet devised for that.
If you imagine a product that gave you an energy of a 20 year-old into your early 100's, (it's easy if you try), you might imagine how a person could acquire nearly all the wealth for themselves.
I do not think a person will work harder to make another billion dollars of income than they will work for their first billion dollars of income. (or something like that... this last sentence was edited due to perhaps not conveying some good example. and it still fails)
The United States has had a much more progressive tax system in the past.
These are, I believe, the top tax rates, or near to the right figures. I don't think these figures applied to capital gains.
2003 = 35%
1981 = 70%
1963 = 91%
Higher figures, at some non-arbitrary numbers would best allow for a lot of meritocracy, while helping to spread wealth more evenly throughout the entire range.
Capital Gains would also need to be governed, I believe.