General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmazon, FBI.gov, and 70,000 Other Sites Are Sending Your Data to Elon's Twitter, New Research Says
At least 70,772 websites are using a Twitter advertising tool called a pixel to send the company information about every person who visits their sites, even people who dont have Twitter accounts, according to a bombshell new report from Adalytics, an ad tech firm. The list includes the websites of government agenciesthe Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, the Department of Educations student aid portalFortune 500 behemothsAmazon, General Motors, Pfizerand health care companies like WebMD and UnitedHealth Group. General Motors, Pfizer, and other companies that claimed they pulled their ads from Twitter after Musks takeover continued to send Twitter data using the advertising Pixel.
By sending data to Twitter, organizations may be putting themselves and their visitors at serious risk. Twitter has a lengthy history of data breaches, infiltration by foreign governments, and fines for security issues by the FTC. Most recently, Twitters former head of security resigned and filed a whistleblower complaint accusing the company of disastrous security practicesand that was before Elon Musk laid off over half of Twitters staff, including swaths of its security team. Among a host of other tech companies that collect data using similar means, that makes Twitter particularly concerning.
The report also finds that many websites havent taken the proper precautions to avoid cyber threats known as a supply chain and code injection attacks, which could allow websites to be hijacked if Twitter was compromised. Thats an even bigger issue due to Twitters history of security problems and apparent lack of engineering staff. In such attacks, third party tools are compromised and used to infiltrate an organizations systems, a serious threat when youre talking about Fortune 500 companies or FBI.gov. Its unlikely, but this kind of attack has happened before, and a similar mechanism led to the SolarWinds hack which compromised much of the US government and private sector.
https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-twitter-amazon-fbi-70000-sites-data-security-1849867489
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)I_UndergroundPanther
(13,330 posts)Selling of information and poaching our information should be a felony.
The rich wont like that because there is
So much money to be had exploiting people and selling thier stuff.
Yet the minute some parasite oligarch gets thier information poached and sold then they'll howl something must be done about this!!
Nothing happens unless its thier pampered asses are attacked.
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)How would the law apply to them?
Hacks of OPM databases compromised 22.1 million people, federal authorities say
Two major breaches last year of U.S. government databases holding personnel records and security-clearance files exposed sensitive information about at least 22.1 million people, including not only federal employees and contractors but their families and friends, U.S. officials said Thursday.
The total vastly exceeds all previous estimates, and marks the most detailed accounting by the Office of Personnel Management of how many people were affected by cyber intrusions that U.S. officials have privately said were traced to the Chinese government.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2015/07/09/hack-of-security-clearance-system-affected-21-5-million-people-federal-authorities-say/
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)This is not about "hacking".
former9thward
(33,424 posts)The hackers also monetize your personal data without your permission.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Snarkoleptic
(6,214 posts)I use Firefox with AdBlock Plus (free extension) and Privacy Badger (free extension from EFF).
I have not seen an ad on Twitter or Youtube in a couple of years.
Until this week, I was also using Ghostery (free extension), but Twit is onto it and now truncates page scrolling.
I toyed with the setting and found a way that will allow Ghostery to run as well.
Linkski-
https://adblockplus.org/
https://www.eff.org/pages/privacy-badger
Not sure Ghostery will be helpful, so leaving that out.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,287 posts)If I don't allow JavaScript programs to run, I figure I'm mostly (probably?) safe.
Of course, I have to allow JavaScript on those rare occasions I order from Amazon, so maybe not?
Do you know if AdBlock Plus is compatible with NoScript?
Snarkoleptic
(6,214 posts)I might want to get a VPN as well, but one of the biggies had a data breach, so not excited jumping right in.
SergeStorms
(20,002 posts)if a VPN would protect me from this nefarious bullshit. I run the McAfee Security Suite and chose to have the VPN on always.
I'd hate to have that right-wing lunatic Musk knowing anything about me.
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)is your best protection against tracking pixels, I use NoScript when browsing.
Harvesting personal data (see Siri, Alexa for instance) is the biggest growth industry in the US. Why else is Zuckerberg rich?
SergeStorms
(20,002 posts)I'll do that right now.
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)That EFF (Electronic Freedom Frontier) link says more about digital security, and Ars Technica talks about tracking pixels, which aren't limited to twitter.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/05/digital-security-and-privacy-tips-those-involved-abortion-access
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/06/facebook-is-receiving-sensitive-medical-information-from-hospital-websites/
GoodRaisin
(10,737 posts)with Purify for my Ad blocker, and use Duck Duck Go for my search engine. Plus run it all in Private mode on my iPad. Also stopped signing on to Facebook and Twitter. I dont have a PC anymore either. I do everything with an iPad and iPhone, which works fine for my limited needs.
And, hope its enough to keep the unwanted out.
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)which is why many of the features on this site, especially the infamous "Link to tweet", don't work for me. For instance, MSN, the commonest link here, won't even load: I get a blank page. That's my net hygiene.
Blocking ads won't stop tracking pixels.
Browsing without protection is like... well, think condoms.
Tracking pixels, also called Meta pixels for Facebook, are ubiqitous. They require a script, generally Javascript, to run. Once you hit a tracking pixel (an invisible single pixel on a web page), the owners of that pixel can follow you all over, plus get all sorts of info on you. They're among the worst of the spyware.
There was a big stink following Dodd about medical web sites using tracking pixels. Some white-hat hackers pretended they were seeking abortion information. Enough got harvested to net a bounty hunter that TX 10K.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/06/facebook-is-receiving-sensitive-medical-information-from-hospital-websites/
BTW, a long time ago, I heard that any website with that little zuckbook or tooter icon will track members. One reason I never joined. This, I think, is different.
The web is predator heaven. Personal data collection makes Musk and Zuckerberg fabulously wealthy (among others). Biggest growth industry in the US. WE ATE THE PRODUCT.
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)orthoclad
(4,728 posts)If Elmo's hard up for cash (especially with ads fleeing), you best believe he's going to monetize all your personal data.
GreenWave
(12,371 posts)I search with Duck, duck.
I use Firefox
Adblock Ultimate (Ublovk is also great)
Flagfox
No problem.
Democracy is the price we pay for Musk's freedom for hate speech.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,287 posts)Joinfortmill
(20,128 posts)bringthePaine
(1,806 posts)orthoclad
(4,728 posts)Does DU use tracking pixels?
(see my reply post above)
Tracking pixels are very bad news.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/06/facebook-is-receiving-sensitive-medical-information-from-hospital-websites/
AnrothElf
(923 posts)Try Mastodon for fuck's sake. It free, open source, friendly, and active. No "algorithm" except first in first out.
Leave the walled gardens. What will it take to convince otherwise reasonable progressives to stop blithely enriching fascists? Fuck the excuses. Delete your account. Fuck your family. Your work. Your Good German friends. Do the right thing.
Ferrets are Cool
(22,536 posts)orthoclad
(4,728 posts)scripts to work.NoScript should do the trick.
Initech
(107,484 posts)orthoclad
(4,728 posts)of how to protect privacy in this predator heaven, the net. It was published after Dodd. Abortion-seekers had their online behavior (like searches for abortion providers) used against them in court.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/05/digital-security-and-privacy-tips-those-involved-abortion-access
It's a constant arms race between data predators and data protectors, so no measures are fool-proof. I have said for decades that you should pretend you're on a busy streetcorner when you're on the internet -- where people can also follow you home. And take your picture and listen to you.
Personally, I never use tooter, zuckbook or anything gaggle. And I don't allow Siri or Alexa in my house.
If you're using Safari, every once in a while go to Preferences/Privacy/Manage Website Data to see a list of all the junk that websites have put on your machine.
Tetrachloride
(9,404 posts)Mac users can also make use of Little Snitch
Last and not least, a decent hosts.txt file for another fundamental layer of protection.
Bev54
(13,210 posts)moniss
(8,767 posts)ask about this would be why would someone knowingly come into a treasure trove of data and make that data basically completely vulnerable to be "stolen"? Follow the money would be my guess. Maybe he is just bartering the info screwing everybody and keeping that fact confidential? I perhaps have some areas that competent media (too bad we don't have it) could explore. How about questions like is this horse's backside doing this in exchange for favorable considerations for his car business? Is he doing it to allow nefarious foreign governments to use the data much like the almost human Zuckerberg did with Cambridge Analytica and how is the financial payoff for Musk committing these acts being done? Is he to get a slide on some of the debt he took on for buying Twitter? How many and who are the parties getting this info by way of Twitter?
There I go again. Silly me. Asking pertinent questions when I should know by now that media will be much more interested in asking Joe Rogan what he thinks abut Prince Harry.
dickthegrouch
(4,306 posts)Just as ubiquitous.
Equally odious and silent as to its behavior.
Every site using it claims to be protective of our privacy. Utter BS.