Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,835 posts)
Sat Dec 31, 2022, 06:05 AM Dec 2022

A Charity Tied to the Supreme Court Offers Donors Access to the Justices

In some years, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. does the honors. In others, it might be Justice Sonia Sotomayor or Justice Clarence Thomas presenting the squared-off hunks of marble affixed with the Supreme Court’s gilded seal.

Hewed from slabs left over from the 1930s construction of the nation’s high court and handed out in its magnificent Great Hall, they are a unique status symbol in a town that craves them. And while the ideological bents of the justices bestowing them might vary, there is one constant: All the recipients have given at least $5,000 to a charity favored by the justices, and, more often than not, the donors have a significant stake in the way the court decides cases.

The charity, the Supreme Court Historical Society, is ostensibly independent of the judicial branch of government, but in reality the two are inextricably intertwined. The charity’s stated mission is straightforward: to preserve the court’s history and educate the public about the court’s importance in American life. But over the years the society has also become a vehicle for those seeking access to nine of the most reclusive and powerful people in the nation. The justices attend the society’s annual black-tie dinner soirees, where they mingle with donors and thank them for their generosity, and serve as M.C.s to more regular society-sponsored lectures or re-enactments of famous cases.

The society has raised more than $23 million over the last two decades. Because of its nonprofit status, it does not have to publicly disclose its donors — and declined when asked to do so. But The New York Times was able to identify the sources behind more than $10.7 million raised since 2003, the first year for which relevant records were available.



https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/30/us/politics/supreme-court-historical-society-donors-justices.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/30/us/politics/supreme-court-historical-society-donors-justices.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Charity Tied to the Supreme Court Offers Donors Access to the Justices (Original Post) RandySF Dec 2022 OP
Congress can do something about this through legislation regulating "charities." Why don't they? nt Samrob Dec 2022 #1
Supreme Court might retaliate and cut off congressional money stream? Irish_Dem Dec 2022 #2
It would be nice if Congress had the right to review the Justices' Income Tax Returns. Midnight Writer Dec 2022 #3
K&R Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2022 #4
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Charity Tied to the Sup...