General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAfter Two-and-a-Half Hours and 20,000 Gallons, Tesla Fire Controlled by MA Firefighters
Last edited Wed Jan 25, 2023, 12:24 AM - Edit history (1)
Black ice sent a motor vehicle crashing into a guardrail in Wakefield Thursday.
The accident happened at about 10:47 p.m. in the northbound lanes of I-95 near Exit 59 as the area was in the midst of a storm.
The driver wasnt injured. As the Tesla was being prepared for removal, however, the guardrail pieced the undercarriage, causing the lithium-ion batteries to go into a thermal runaway. The vehicle became fully involved in fire.
In addition to two trucks from Wakefield, engines from Melrose, Stoneham, Reading, Lynnfield as well as a Middleton water tanker assisted in shuttling water to the scene. 20,000 gallons of water was used to extinguish the fire, which took two-and-a-half hours to fight.
https://www.firefighternation.com/firefighting/after-two-and-a-half-hours-and-20000-gallons-tesla-fire-controlled-by-ma-firefighters/#gref
2 1/2 hours and 20K gallons of water.
Edit to correct the link.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)Many more ICE vehicle fires than EV vehicle fires per miles driven. EV fires are different and can be harder to extinguish, but they're also less like to cause an explosion.
EVs are new, so there are some safety aspects that are being improved on, but overall they are already safer. Lower center of gravity makes them safer. More evenly distributed weight is a big safety feature. Heavier means safer. Less likely to explode, less likely to catch fire.
We're just starting, they're easier and cheaper to build too, so the price will eventually be lower than ICE vehicles.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)2naSalit
(86,636 posts)Could we both be wrong?
I think a better way to douse such fires will be in order. Foam?
progressoid
(49,991 posts)A high-voltage battery is made up of many cells packed tightly together inside a watertight, fire-resistant box. When a single cell fails, it is essentially a small explosive that produces a tremendous amount of gas and heat (1,200 degrees F) in tenths of a second. The failure is an exothermic chemical reaction that does not require oxygen from the atmosphere to sustain itself. The heat released from each individual cell is transferred to the neighboring cells, which causes them to fail as well.
Once a battery cell fails, it is impossible to extinguish the failed cell as the chemical reaction inside the cell happens far too quickly. The only way to stop a thermal runaway is by directly cooling the cells involved to ensure that the failed cell does not cause the cells around it to also fail.
With that in mind, what tools and firefighters use to stop thermal runaway and extinguish these fires?
Firefighting foam
Firefighting foams work by creating a blanket to smother a fire. Many types of foam have properties that cool the surrounding area by assisting the water in absorbing heat. Unfortunately, getting the foam to the failed cells is difficult, if not impossible, because the thermal runaway event is happening inside a watertight, fire-resistant box. Additionally, even if it was possible to get the foam inside the box and flood the area with foam, the foam's main purpose is typically to starve a fires oxygen supply, but a lithium-ion battery cell does not need external oxygen to burn. Consequently, foam is ineffective at stopping a thermal runaway.
more...https://www.firerescue1.com/electric-vehicles/articles/electric-vehicle-fires-where-the-waiting-game-wins-f934UedqIpVqc1k2/
2naSalit
(86,636 posts)I wasn't quite sure about it, never had to deal with a battery fire of that type. I couldn't really imagine what would work, guess that's why. Thanks for the info.
Hekate
(90,705 posts)progressoid
(49,991 posts)Because the lithium has an ignition point of 500°C, the battery has to be cooled to a sub-ignition temperature. That's why it took the fire fighters in Texas 30,000 gallons of water and 4 hours to extinguish the blaze.
https://thompson-safety.com/company/press/lithium-ion-battery-fire
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)progressoid
(49,991 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,057 posts)During the ion transfer, there is for a short time, elemental lithium.
Apparently, when these go into thermal overload the transfer inefficiency falls so the lithium transfers, but has nowhere to go.
So, as the casing fails lithium is exposed to the water being used and it accelerates the fire.
Class D fires are put out by smothering with sand or salt. Water can release copious amounts of hydrogen, while a fire is already burning.
Those 2 are not good playmates.
usonian
(9,810 posts)sheshe2
(83,779 posts)I usually double check the links I copy.
Hekate
(90,705 posts)
they are nothing like Tesla batteries. The whole damn State of California could burn down.
Okay, on edit. Solar tiles are not the same. However if you want a battery to store the energy for after the sun goes down or the power goes out that battery is a Tesla battery.
sheshe2
(83,779 posts)Hopefully batteries are not included in the solar panels.
Hekate
(90,705 posts)Elon Musk does not seem all that trustworthy.
sheshe2
(83,779 posts)Both Tesla and Elon suck. It's true.
No Batteries!
orleans
(34,053 posts)BlueWaveNeverEnd
(7,934 posts)BSdetect
(8,998 posts)sl8
(13,781 posts)ICE vehicles on the road outnumber EVs by far more than 11:1.
The larger point is the apparent difficulty in extinguishing the fire .
Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)55 ICE vehicle fires for every billion mile driven vs 5 EV vehicle fires for every billion miles driven.
Another study showed even less more common ,61 times less often in EVs than ICE vehicles.
EV fires can be trickier to put out though and fire departments probably need some more training on handling them.
When it comes to EVs, fires are much less common and probably not quite as dangerous because there's less likely to be an explosion like with fires fueled by 10-50 gallons of gasoline in a thin metal tank below the vehicle. But they can be harder to extinguish.
sl8
(13,781 posts)Response to Johnny2X2X (Reply #23)
sl8 This message was self-deleted by its author.