Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(83,779 posts)
Tue Jan 24, 2023, 11:29 PM Jan 2023

After Two-and-a-Half Hours and 20,000 Gallons, Tesla Fire Controlled by MA Firefighters

Last edited Wed Jan 25, 2023, 12:24 AM - Edit history (1)

Black ice sent a motor vehicle crashing into a guardrail in Wakefield Thursday.

The accident happened at about 10:47 p.m. in the northbound lanes of I-95 near Exit 59 as the area was in the midst of a storm.

The driver wasn’t injured. As the Tesla was being prepared for removal, however, the guardrail pieced the undercarriage, causing the lithium-ion batteries to go into a thermal runaway. The vehicle became fully involved in fire.

In addition to two trucks from Wakefield, engines from Melrose, Stoneham, Reading, Lynnfield as well as a Middleton water tanker assisted in shuttling water to the scene. 20,000 gallons of water was used to extinguish the fire, which took two-and-a-half hours to fight.

https://www.firefighternation.com/firefighting/after-two-and-a-half-hours-and-20000-gallons-tesla-fire-controlled-by-ma-firefighters/#gref





2 1/2 hours and 20K gallons of water.

Edit to correct the link.

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After Two-and-a-Half Hours and 20,000 Gallons, Tesla Fire Controlled by MA Firefighters (Original Post) sheshe2 Jan 2023 OP
They should be illegal. nt DURHAM D Jan 2023 #1
ICE vehicles should be Johnny2X2X Jan 2023 #27
I could swear I learned at like 7 years old you don't put out electrical fires with water Hugh_Lebowski Jan 2023 #2
I seem to recall that as well... 2naSalit Jan 2023 #5
Foam won't work. progressoid Jan 2023 #13
I see... 2naSalit Jan 2023 #15
But does lithium-ion count as electricity? or just a producer of same? Hekate Jan 2023 #6
lithium-ion batteries are a class B (flammable liquid) hazard. progressoid Jan 2023 #11
Thanks for the facts, always love to learn new stuff :) (nt) Hugh_Lebowski Jan 2023 #12
Me too. This post caused me to do a little interneting. n/t progressoid Jan 2023 #14
Class D, Too ProfessorGAC Jan 2023 #20
I didn't see it at that link. This one works well. usonian Jan 2023 #3
Thanks, will change it. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #4
We have a neighbor who's having Tesla solar tiles installed on his roof. Somebody please tell me... Hekate Jan 2023 #7
It was the battery that was punctured when they took it off the guardrail. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #9
I edited my post to reflect further info. I've lost a lot of faith in Tesla, though.... Hekate Jan 2023 #10
Yes on all your points. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #16
... sheshe2 Jan 2023 #17
holy shit! nt orleans Jan 2023 #8
kick BlueWaveNeverEnd Jan 2023 #18
Still 11 times fewer fires than in ICE vehicles. Yes, that is a fact. BSdetect Jan 2023 #19
Total or percentages? sl8 Jan 2023 #21
It's 11:1 frequency in one study Johnny2X2X Jan 2023 #23
Thank you. nt sl8 Jan 2023 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author sl8 Jan 2023 #25
It makes me wonder if I would like to park my Tesla in the garage, next to my bedroom? Chainfire Jan 2023 #22
I hear you. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #26

Johnny2X2X

(19,066 posts)
27. ICE vehicles should be
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:21 PM
Jan 2023

Many more ICE vehicle fires than EV vehicle fires per miles driven. EV fires are different and can be harder to extinguish, but they're also less like to cause an explosion.

EVs are new, so there are some safety aspects that are being improved on, but overall they are already safer. Lower center of gravity makes them safer. More evenly distributed weight is a big safety feature. Heavier means safer. Less likely to explode, less likely to catch fire.

We're just starting, they're easier and cheaper to build too, so the price will eventually be lower than ICE vehicles.

2naSalit

(86,636 posts)
5. I seem to recall that as well...
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:11 AM
Jan 2023

Could we both be wrong?

I think a better way to douse such fires will be in order. Foam?

progressoid

(49,991 posts)
13. Foam won't work.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:52 AM
Jan 2023
Understanding thermal runaway

A high-voltage battery is made up of many cells packed tightly together inside a watertight, fire-resistant box. When a single cell fails, it is essentially a small explosive that produces a tremendous amount of gas and heat (1,200 degrees F) in tenths of a second. The failure is an exothermic chemical reaction that does not require oxygen from the atmosphere to sustain itself. The heat released from each individual cell is transferred to the neighboring cells, which causes them to fail as well.

Once a battery cell fails, it is impossible to extinguish the failed cell as the chemical reaction inside the cell happens far too quickly. The only way to stop a thermal runaway is by directly cooling the cells involved to ensure that the failed cell does not cause the cells around it to also fail.


With that in mind, what tools and firefighters use to stop thermal runaway and extinguish these fires?

Firefighting foam

Firefighting foams work by creating a blanket to smother a fire. Many types of foam have properties that cool the surrounding area by assisting the water in absorbing heat. Unfortunately, getting the foam to the failed cells is difficult, if not impossible, because the thermal runaway event is happening inside a watertight, fire-resistant box. Additionally, even if it was possible to get the foam inside the box and flood the area with foam, the foam's main purpose is typically to starve a fire’s oxygen supply, but a lithium-ion battery cell does not need external oxygen to burn. Consequently, foam is ineffective at stopping a thermal runaway.


more...https://www.firerescue1.com/electric-vehicles/articles/electric-vehicle-fires-where-the-waiting-game-wins-f934UedqIpVqc1k2/

2naSalit

(86,636 posts)
15. I see...
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:00 AM
Jan 2023

I wasn't quite sure about it, never had to deal with a battery fire of that type. I couldn't really imagine what would work, guess that's why. Thanks for the info.

progressoid

(49,991 posts)
11. lithium-ion batteries are a class B (flammable liquid) hazard.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:48 AM
Jan 2023
As fire fighters have discovered in recent years, lithium-ion battery fires are prone to reigniting. That's because the lithium salts in the battery are self-oxidizing, which means that they can't be "starved out" like a traditional fire. So how do you put it out?

Because the lithium has an ignition point of 500°C, the battery has to be cooled to a sub-ignition temperature. That's why it took the fire fighters in Texas 30,000 gallons of water and 4 hours to extinguish the blaze.

https://thompson-safety.com/company/press/lithium-ion-battery-fire

ProfessorGAC

(65,057 posts)
20. Class D, Too
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 08:48 AM
Jan 2023

During the ion transfer, there is for a short time, elemental lithium.
Apparently, when these go into thermal overload the transfer inefficiency falls so the lithium transfers, but has nowhere to go.
So, as the casing fails lithium is exposed to the water being used and it accelerates the fire.
Class D fires are put out by smothering with sand or salt. Water can release copious amounts of hydrogen, while a fire is already burning.
Those 2 are not good playmates.

Hekate

(90,705 posts)
7. We have a neighbor who's having Tesla solar tiles installed on his roof. Somebody please tell me...
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:19 AM
Jan 2023

…they are nothing like Tesla batteries. The whole damn State of California could burn down.

Okay, on edit. Solar tiles are not the same. However if you want a battery to store the energy for after the sun goes down or the power goes out — that battery is a Tesla battery.

sheshe2

(83,779 posts)
9. It was the battery that was punctured when they took it off the guardrail.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:25 AM
Jan 2023

Hopefully batteries are not included in the solar panels.

Hekate

(90,705 posts)
10. I edited my post to reflect further info. I've lost a lot of faith in Tesla, though....
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:29 AM
Jan 2023

Elon Musk does not seem all that trustworthy.

sl8

(13,781 posts)
21. Total or percentages?
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 08:57 AM
Jan 2023

ICE vehicles on the road outnumber EVs by far more than 11:1.

The larger point is the apparent difficulty in extinguishing the fire .

Johnny2X2X

(19,066 posts)
23. It's 11:1 frequency in one study
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 12:27 PM
Jan 2023

55 ICE vehicle fires for every billion mile driven vs 5 EV vehicle fires for every billion miles driven.

Another study showed even less more common ,61 times less often in EVs than ICE vehicles.

EV fires can be trickier to put out though and fire departments probably need some more training on handling them.

When it comes to EVs, fires are much less common and probably not quite as dangerous because there's less likely to be an explosion like with fires fueled by 10-50 gallons of gasoline in a thin metal tank below the vehicle. But they can be harder to extinguish.

Response to Johnny2X2X (Reply #23)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After Two-and-a-Half Hour...