Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

packman

(16,296 posts)
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 12:56 PM Jan 2023

"Disturbing new evidence" in Brett Kavanaugh documentary sparks call for DOJ probe


The surprise premiere of a documentary revealing "shocking new allegations" of sexual crimes committed decades ago by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh sparked new calls on Monday for Senate and Justice Department investigations.

Doug Liman's Justice premiered Friday as a last-minute addition to the lineup of the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah. According to Free Speech for People, the film "includes important new details about specific allegations of sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh" and "also reveals disturbing new evidence of misconduct by Kavanaugh and his associates" surrounding the right-wing justice's 2018 Senate confirmation hearings.

This includes "evidence that Kavanaugh may have knowingly perjured himself" and that the justice's associates engaged in what his friend referred to as "a cover-up."





https://www.salon.com/2023/01/24/disturbing-new-evidence-in-brett-kavanaugh-documentary-sparks-call-for-doj-probe_partner/
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Disturbing new evidence" in Brett Kavanaugh documentary sparks call for DOJ probe (Original Post) packman Jan 2023 OP
I hope they make this film available on line! Quakerfriend Jan 2023 #1
+1,000,000 Peregrine Took Jan 2023 #9
Keep the pressure on and expose this corrupt USSC. nt in2herbs Jan 2023 #2
One of the most disturbing aspects of the whole Kavanaugh matter - Ocelot II Jan 2023 #3
Wray is a law school acquaintance of Bofo gab13by13 Jan 2023 #4
My good friend Casady1 Jan 2023 #6
Very interesting! Quakerfriend Jan 2023 #18
They also both belong to the Federalist Society. Raster Jan 2023 #13
Who is Bofo? ShazzieB Jan 2023 #26
Kavanaugh, I think. Ligyron Jan 2023 #30
Sounds like a possibility. ShazzieB Jan 2023 #32
Well "buffing" is the term for this practice I believe. Ligyron Jan 2023 #33
We also all got to watch the Republican Party's extensive obstruction, Hortensis Jan 2023 #15
We now know some of the FBI works for Putin, not for the US public. Irish_Dem Jan 2023 #24
Is It A Secret RobinA Jan 2023 #5
It is not about Casady1 Jan 2023 #7
When was this alleged to have happened? Polybius Jan 2023 #12
It would have to have been after Ford (I think). Texin Jan 2023 #23
The alleged assault of Ford took place when they were in high school. ShazzieB Jan 2023 #28
It would be nice if we could watch this documentary first before so we can make our Bev54 Jan 2023 #8
Sundance is showing it now and it's looking like the right people will buy it to show publicly. flying_wahini Jan 2023 #10
The filmmaker seems to really want to get this information out to the public. ShazzieB Jan 2023 #29
I doubt he'd resign... boyedav1969 Jan 2023 #11
Impeachments won't even form in the House Polybius Jan 2023 #14
The public pressure this could engender Torchlight Jan 2023 #16
Why would that happen? Effete Snob Jan 2023 #22
There was certainly a sweetheart deal with RWNJs in the FBI Warpy Jan 2023 #17
I know Whitehouse has been asking for Wray to Quakerfriend Jan 2023 #19
The FBI only got 4,500 tips on Kavanaugh Botany Jan 2023 #25
Frank Figliuzzi explained that once an appointee has been summer_in_TX Jan 2023 #35
The DOJ needs to indict him now MichMan Jan 2023 #20
ASAP! housecat Jan 2023 #21
For this thread LetMyPeopleVote Jan 2023 #27
Brooke's Brothers Mob IbogaProject Jan 2023 #31
🧤 IrishAfricanAmerican Jan 2023 #34

Ocelot II

(115,719 posts)
3. One of the most disturbing aspects of the whole Kavanaugh matter -
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:04 PM
Jan 2023

apart from the sexual misconduct allegations themselves, of course - is the fact that the FBI never did an actual investigation; they just turned over all the leads they got to TFG's White House!

 

Casady1

(2,133 posts)
6. My good friend
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:26 PM
Jan 2023

knows Ms Ramirez and was at Yale at the time. He has no doubt in his mind that kavanaugh did this. The culture at Yale was toxic. My friend is a conservative.

ShazzieB

(16,412 posts)
26. Who is Bofo?
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 03:08 PM
Jan 2023

I can usually figure out most of the nicknames people post here, but this one has me scratching my head.

Ligyron

(7,633 posts)
33. Well "buffing" is the term for this practice I believe.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 03:55 PM
Jan 2023

This came out somehow during conversations about his less than gentlemanly activities in the past.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
15. We also all got to watch the Republican Party's extensive obstruction,
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:51 PM
Jan 2023

extensive coverup of years of documentation of this scumbag's dirty work for Republicans, and refusal to consider the evidence they didn't manage to hide that Democrats introduced during the senate confirmation hearing.

All a preview of how Republican senators would deal with the tRump impeachment trials.

Irish_Dem

(47,114 posts)
24. We now know some of the FBI works for Putin, not for the US public.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:37 PM
Jan 2023

What better way to bring down democracy than by installing criminals to high office?

RobinA

(9,893 posts)
5. Is It A Secret
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:24 PM
Jan 2023

what these "new allegations" and "important details" are? If the movie has been shown, why all the weasel words? I've heard nothing substantive, maybe I'm missing it.

Texin

(2,596 posts)
23. It would have to have been after Ford (I think).
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:32 PM
Jan 2023

Unless he and his buddy were already in college, but I thought they were in high school and she was just a freshman or it happened before her first year of HS.

ShazzieB

(16,412 posts)
28. The alleged assault of Ford took place when they were in high school.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 03:20 PM
Jan 2023

So yes, before the incident with Ramirez at Yale.

Bev54

(10,052 posts)
8. It would be nice if we could watch this documentary first before so we can make our
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:31 PM
Jan 2023

own conclusions on whether this is real evidence or more hype.

flying_wahini

(6,600 posts)
10. Sundance is showing it now and it's looking like the right people will buy it to show publicly.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:37 PM
Jan 2023

But I wouldn’t be surprised if it gets bought so they can bury it away from the public’s eye.

ShazzieB

(16,412 posts)
29. The filmmaker seems to really want to get this information out to the public.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 03:27 PM
Jan 2023

Otherwise, there wouldn't be much point in making a film about it, much less showing it at Sundance, which is why we're all talking about it here.

Seem to me he'd be careful to sell the distribution rights to a legimate distributor, not someone who wants to bury it. I'm sure there are ways of ensuring that.

boyedav1969

(93 posts)
11. I doubt he'd resign...
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:42 PM
Jan 2023

..just as much as I doubt he'd be convicted if impeached.

I'm not sure it matters how much substance there is to the claims. Maybe something leading to a conviction would make a difference?

We don't have a congress that's willing to do their job. They're not going to expand the bench, and impeachments will die in the Senate.

Torchlight

(3,341 posts)
16. The public pressure this could engender
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 01:53 PM
Jan 2023

might be substantive enough to affect subtle changes of narrative (the "I wanna spend more time with my family" kind).

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
22. Why would that happen?
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:25 PM
Jan 2023

I don’t understand what the DoJ would investigate here. There is no prosecutable federal crime alleged, and any questions over his confirmation testimony would be within the impeachment jurisdiction of the House, which isn’t happening.

The entire point of the way these folks are appointed, confirmed, and potentially removed is to specifically insulate them against public pressure to do or not do anything.

He’s not going to give two shits about this movie, because I’ll let you in on a little secret - anything he did, he’s actually known about it for years. So none of it is news to him.

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
17. There was certainly a sweetheart deal with RWNJs in the FBI
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:07 PM
Jan 2023

and anyone connected to the non vetting of this man needs to lose his job pronto, from Wray on down if the whole thing went that high up in the food chain. We know his nomination was rushed through without adequate time for any background check. We only suspected the FBI was in on the con.

He and Thomas are extremely vulnerable. Alito should be vulnerable to impeachment for ruling as Pope, not USSC.

And the next ruling on abortion should be predicated on both the Fourth and Thirteenth Amendments and a few tart phrases about politicians who try to practice medicine wouldn't be amiss.

Quakerfriend

(5,450 posts)
19. I know Whitehouse has been asking for Wray to
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:14 PM
Jan 2023

release the FBI records re: the tip line for many, many months. The FBI turned the info. over to the Trump administration!

Botany

(70,510 posts)
25. The FBI only got 4,500 tips on Kavanaugh
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:57 PM
Jan 2023

The FBI acknowledged receiving more than 4,500 tips during its background investigation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, prompting a new wave of criticism from Senate Democrats who have long questioned the bureau's vetting process.

Though the Senate confirmed Kavanaugh by a narrow majority (50-48) three years ago, the process was defined by the emotional testimony of California university professor Christine Blasey Ford and Kavanaugh's angry denials that he sexually assaulted her in the early 1980s.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/07/22/brett-kavanaugh-review-sparked-4-500-tips-fbi/8057810002/

The evidence needs to be brought forward and if it is proven that that he sexually attacked women and
perjured himself he should be removed from the SCOTUS

summer_in_TX

(2,738 posts)
35. Frank Figliuzzi explained that once an appointee has been
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 07:28 PM
Jan 2023

vetted for any federal position and confirmed by Congress, any further vetting is always funneled to the president appointing them to a new position, never to Congress.

Since Kavanaugh had been confirmed earlier to the US Circuit Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit, the vetting for his Supreme Court appointment could be controlled by McTurtle and TFG.

Clearly, that's a law that badly needs changing. The earlier appointment didn't get the publicity to generate people coming forward, unlike his appointment to SCOTUS.

Figliuzzi said Whitehouse knew all that well. He seemed frustrated that there was not more transparency about that long-standing policy.

MichMan

(11,932 posts)
20. The DOJ needs to indict him now
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 02:15 PM
Jan 2023

Once he is facing jail time, his appointment to the SC would have to be rescinded

IbogaProject

(2,816 posts)
31. Brooke's Brothers Mob
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 03:35 PM
Jan 2023

He was a prominent face during that electoral count intimidation scheme. And he worked on the Starr BS about Mr Clinton. Just extra info about his character. Also who paid off his mortgage or his large credit card tab?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Disturbing new evidence"...