General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Disturbing new evidence" in Brett Kavanaugh documentary sparks call for DOJ probe
The surprise premiere of a documentary revealing "shocking new allegations" of sexual crimes committed decades ago by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh sparked new calls on Monday for Senate and Justice Department investigations.
Doug Liman's Justice premiered Friday as a last-minute addition to the lineup of the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah. According to Free Speech for People, the film "includes important new details about specific allegations of sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh" and "also reveals disturbing new evidence of misconduct by Kavanaugh and his associates" surrounding the right-wing justice's 2018 Senate confirmation hearings.
This includes "evidence that Kavanaugh may have knowingly perjured himself" and that the justice's associates engaged in what his friend referred to as "a cover-up."
https://www.salon.com/2023/01/24/disturbing-new-evidence-in-brett-kavanaugh-documentary-sparks-call-for-doj-probe_partner/
Quakerfriend
(5,450 posts)He needs to go!
Peregrine Took
(7,414 posts)in2herbs
(2,945 posts)Ocelot II
(115,719 posts)apart from the sexual misconduct allegations themselves, of course - is the fact that the FBI never did an actual investigation; they just turned over all the leads they got to TFG's White House!
gab13by13
(21,349 posts)Casady1
(2,133 posts)knows Ms Ramirez and was at Yale at the time. He has no doubt in his mind that kavanaugh did this. The culture at Yale was toxic. My friend is a conservative.
Quakerfriend
(5,450 posts)Thanks for the inside info.
Raster
(20,998 posts)ShazzieB
(16,412 posts)I can usually figure out most of the nicknames people post here, but this one has me scratching my head.
Ligyron
(7,633 posts)Reference to consuming alcohol via the colon.
ShazzieB
(16,412 posts)Bofo still seems cryptic to me, but maybe that's it.
Ligyron
(7,633 posts)This came out somehow during conversations about his less than gentlemanly activities in the past.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)extensive coverup of years of documentation of this scumbag's dirty work for Republicans, and refusal to consider the evidence they didn't manage to hide that Democrats introduced during the senate confirmation hearing.
All a preview of how Republican senators would deal with the tRump impeachment trials.
Irish_Dem
(47,114 posts)What better way to bring down democracy than by installing criminals to high office?
RobinA
(9,893 posts)what these "new allegations" and "important details" are? If the movie has been shown, why all the weasel words? I've heard nothing substantive, maybe I'm missing it.
Casady1
(2,133 posts)Ford. It is about Debbie Ramirez.
Polybius
(15,423 posts)Before, after, or around the same time as Ford?
Texin
(2,596 posts)Unless he and his buddy were already in college, but I thought they were in high school and she was just a freshman or it happened before her first year of HS.
ShazzieB
(16,412 posts)So yes, before the incident with Ramirez at Yale.
Bev54
(10,052 posts)own conclusions on whether this is real evidence or more hype.
flying_wahini
(6,600 posts)But I wouldnt be surprised if it gets bought so they can bury it away from the publics eye.
ShazzieB
(16,412 posts)Otherwise, there wouldn't be much point in making a film about it, much less showing it at Sundance, which is why we're all talking about it here.
Seem to me he'd be careful to sell the distribution rights to a legimate distributor, not someone who wants to bury it. I'm sure there are ways of ensuring that.
boyedav1969
(93 posts)..just as much as I doubt he'd be convicted if impeached.
I'm not sure it matters how much substance there is to the claims. Maybe something leading to a conviction would make a difference?
We don't have a congress that's willing to do their job. They're not going to expand the bench, and impeachments will die in the Senate.
Polybius
(15,423 posts)Not the McCarthy House.
Torchlight
(3,341 posts)might be substantive enough to affect subtle changes of narrative (the "I wanna spend more time with my family" kind).
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)I dont understand what the DoJ would investigate here. There is no prosecutable federal crime alleged, and any questions over his confirmation testimony would be within the impeachment jurisdiction of the House, which isnt happening.
The entire point of the way these folks are appointed, confirmed, and potentially removed is to specifically insulate them against public pressure to do or not do anything.
Hes not going to give two shits about this movie, because Ill let you in on a little secret - anything he did, hes actually known about it for years. So none of it is news to him.
Warpy
(111,267 posts)and anyone connected to the non vetting of this man needs to lose his job pronto, from Wray on down if the whole thing went that high up in the food chain. We know his nomination was rushed through without adequate time for any background check. We only suspected the FBI was in on the con.
He and Thomas are extremely vulnerable. Alito should be vulnerable to impeachment for ruling as Pope, not USSC.
And the next ruling on abortion should be predicated on both the Fourth and Thirteenth Amendments and a few tart phrases about politicians who try to practice medicine wouldn't be amiss.
Quakerfriend
(5,450 posts)release the FBI records re: the tip line for many, many months. The FBI turned the info. over to the Trump administration!
Botany
(70,510 posts)The FBI acknowledged receiving more than 4,500 tips during its background investigation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, prompting a new wave of criticism from Senate Democrats who have long questioned the bureau's vetting process.
Though the Senate confirmed Kavanaugh by a narrow majority (50-48) three years ago, the process was defined by the emotional testimony of California university professor Christine Blasey Ford and Kavanaugh's angry denials that he sexually assaulted her in the early 1980s.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/07/22/brett-kavanaugh-review-sparked-4-500-tips-fbi/8057810002/
The evidence needs to be brought forward and if it is proven that that he sexually attacked women and
perjured himself he should be removed from the SCOTUS
summer_in_TX
(2,738 posts)vetted for any federal position and confirmed by Congress, any further vetting is always funneled to the president appointing them to a new position, never to Congress.
Since Kavanaugh had been confirmed earlier to the US Circuit Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit, the vetting for his Supreme Court appointment could be controlled by McTurtle and TFG.
Clearly, that's a law that badly needs changing. The earlier appointment didn't get the publicity to generate people coming forward, unlike his appointment to SCOTUS.
Figliuzzi said Whitehouse knew all that well. He seemed frustrated that there was not more transparency about that long-standing policy.
MichMan
(11,932 posts)Once he is facing jail time, his appointment to the SC would have to be rescinded
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,291 posts)IbogaProject
(2,816 posts)He was a prominent face during that electoral count intimidation scheme. And he worked on the Starr BS about Mr Clinton. Just extra info about his character. Also who paid off his mortgage or his large credit card tab?