Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Worst Attorney General In 50 Years Was Even More Corrupt Than We Thought
Single Malt JusticeIt turns out Bill Barr and John Durham were sipping scotch as they burned down Main Justice.
Extraordinary new reporting from the New York Times peels back more layers of corruption, malfeasance, and politicization within the Barr Justice Department. In a groundbreaking story that is focused on Special Counsel John Durham but is really an indictment of Barr, the NYT unveils several previously unreported episodes:
Durham Investigated Trump?!? The most explosive revelation in the NYT piece is that Barr allegedly directed Durham to dramatically expand his brief beyond investigating the investigators by opening a financial crimes investigation in the fall of 2019 of President Donald Trump based on a tantalizing tip from Italian authorities. Its unclear how and to what extent Durham investigated the tip. No charges ever resulted. While its unclear what exactly Durham did with the tip, the strong impression left by the story is that the Trump investigation was buried.
Oopsies! The New York Times and other news outlets later misleadingly reported that Durhams review of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe had turned into a criminal investigation, suggesting that the Durham was zeroing in on the investigators of Trump. In fact, Durhams criminal probe involved Trump himself. Barr never sought to correct the widespread public misperception:
The news reports, however, were all framed around the erroneous assumption that the criminal investigation must mean Mr. Durham had found evidence of potential crimes by officials involved in the Russia inquiry. Mr. Barr, who weighed in publicly about the Durham inquiry at regular intervals in ways that advanced a pro-Trump narrative, chose in this instance not to clarify what was really happening.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/morning-memo/bill-barr-john-durham-special-counsel-investigation
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1136 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Worst Attorney General In 50 Years Was Even More Corrupt Than We Thought (Original Post)
kpete
Jan 2023
OP
And nothing will happen to him or Durhsm. It's so tiring, nothing ever happens.
dem4decades
Jan 2023
#2
underpants
(182,799 posts)1. Thanks. Saw this on Morning Joe and wanted to read it.
dem4decades
(11,288 posts)2. And nothing will happen to him or Durhsm. It's so tiring, nothing ever happens.
It's all the same bullshit, no one pays, except us.
underpants
(182,799 posts)3. That was a great long read.
Kicking.