When investigating certain crimes, Failure to indict is not an option.

[fightforfreedom]

When it comes to the secret document investigation. Trump committed a crime where not indicting is not an option.

Set aside the secret documents for a moment. When someone is subpoenaed by a federal grand jury for ANY evidence and they fail to do so. They hide the evidence and are caught red handed. That someone must be indicted. This is a serious felony. Not indicting is not an option.

In the J6 investigation, for me the most damning evidence against Trump is the 187 minutes. The 187 minutes proves a crime was committed and proves intent. Trump sent the crowd to the capital. The crowd attacked, the crime is on video. Trump watched the crime for 187 minutes. During that time he inflamed the attack. During that time there is undeniable evidence Trump refused to stop the attack, to stop the crime. That proves intent. He wanted it to happen. People on a jury would understand the 187 minutes evidence.

Because of examples like I just listed, I believe not indicting Trump is not an option.

[FoxNewsSucks]

1. It shouldn't be an option

But it also should not have been an option for his other crimes either. And so far it's the only option. If that doesn't change, and soon, I don't think k the country will recover from it

[fightforfreedom]

2. The rule of law would collapse, that's why it is not an option.

Indictments are coming. People are too focused on made up timelines.