Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs this a bailout and 6 other questions about the SVB collapse
https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2023/03/13/svb-bank-bailout-fed/.
Gift Link: https://wapo.st/3TgaRX2
Why did the government step in?
When regulators took over SVB on Friday, many financial experts thought the banks collapse would have little impact on the broader U.S. economy.
After all, Silicon Valley Banks customer base mirrored its name: Its customers were venture capitalists, start-ups and other firms across the technology sector, which had laid off thousands of workers in recent months with few ill effects on the booming national economy.
What does the rescue plan do?
Officials tried to short-circuit the logic of a bank run and restore depositors confidence that their money is safe.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will guarantee all deposits at SVB and Signature even those above the usual $250,000 limit. SVB held roughly $150 billion in uninsured deposits, and Signature Bank held more than $70 billion in uninsured deposits. Those customers will be able to access all their funds now, even though the banks collapsed. This sends the message that customers have no reason to move their money, because they wont lose it if their bank goes down.
Is this a government bailout?
The announcement Sunday immediately set off a debate over whether these actions amount to a federal bailout.
On a call with reporters, a Treasury official emphasized that the federal intervention would not bring SVB or Signature back to life, as the enormously controversial bank bailouts during the 2008 financial crisis had done for banks that were close to failing. Their executives would not retain their jobs. These new safeguards were aimed at protecting people and businesses who had made a reasonable decision to put their money into an accredited and regulated bank not investors who bought risky securities.
Gift Link: https://wapo.st/3TgaRX2
Why did the government step in?
When regulators took over SVB on Friday, many financial experts thought the banks collapse would have little impact on the broader U.S. economy.
After all, Silicon Valley Banks customer base mirrored its name: Its customers were venture capitalists, start-ups and other firms across the technology sector, which had laid off thousands of workers in recent months with few ill effects on the booming national economy.
What does the rescue plan do?
Officials tried to short-circuit the logic of a bank run and restore depositors confidence that their money is safe.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will guarantee all deposits at SVB and Signature even those above the usual $250,000 limit. SVB held roughly $150 billion in uninsured deposits, and Signature Bank held more than $70 billion in uninsured deposits. Those customers will be able to access all their funds now, even though the banks collapsed. This sends the message that customers have no reason to move their money, because they wont lose it if their bank goes down.
Is this a government bailout?
The announcement Sunday immediately set off a debate over whether these actions amount to a federal bailout.
On a call with reporters, a Treasury official emphasized that the federal intervention would not bring SVB or Signature back to life, as the enormously controversial bank bailouts during the 2008 financial crisis had done for banks that were close to failing. Their executives would not retain their jobs. These new safeguards were aimed at protecting people and businesses who had made a reasonable decision to put their money into an accredited and regulated bank not investors who bought risky securities.
Here's a decent explainer for the current situation. I've provided a gift link if you want to read the whole thing for free.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 431 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is this a bailout and 6 other questions about the SVB collapse (Original Post)
IronLionZion
Mar 2023
OP
Casady1
(2,133 posts)1. Start ups are very important
to our overall economy. It is where new ideas start and eventually becomes the applications that everyone uses. It streamlines businesses worldwide and makes the USA number one in intellectual property. When was the last time IBM, HP or Computer Associates developed a piece of software.
crickets
(25,987 posts)2. K&R for visibility.