Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ImNotGod

(1,194 posts)
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 12:45 PM Mar 2023

Ben & Jerry's Faces Boycott Calls Over Founder's Stance on Ukraine Weapons

Ben & Jerry's ice cream is facing boycott calls after co-founder Ben Cohen spoke out against U.S. providing military aid to Ukraine.
Cohen believes the U.S. should use its power to negotiate an end to the war instead of supplying weapons.
This isn't the first time Ben & Jerry's has faced backlash for its social views, with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis taking a harsh stance against the company in 2021.

https://www.newsweek.com/ben-jerrys-faces-boycott-calls-over-founders-stance-ukraine-weapons-1788962

Ben Cohen has donated more than $1 million to a group campaigning to turn the U.S. public against President Biden's military support for Ukraine

Sounds like they are serving russian kool aid with their ice cream

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ben & Jerry's Faces Boycott Calls Over Founder's Stance on Ukraine Weapons (Original Post) ImNotGod Mar 2023 OP
Cohen should know Business and politics do not mix. pwb Mar 2023 #1
"Peace" isn't Negotiating with Terrorists. Cha Mar 2023 #40
Ben is a pacifist. Ben has used their company for many social causes. Ben is consistent. ZonkerHarris Mar 2023 #2
Putin Invading Ukraine Is Hardly A 'Liberal Cause', Sir... The Magistrate Mar 2023 #3
This. Jirel Mar 2023 #5
everybody likes to dance when the war drums play that beat. Boogie down ZonkerHarris Mar 2023 #6
Even The Comic Strip Character Does Better Than That, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2023 #12
Thank You! Cha Mar 2023 #42
I am so stealing this (with your permission of course, lol) Celerity Mar 2023 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author old as dirt Mar 2023 #21
I do not think that being anti-war (as a initial philosophical premiss) is 'leftist extremism' Celerity Mar 2023 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author old as dirt Mar 2023 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author old as dirt Mar 2023 #27
Nevertheless, he still chose to fight Hitler rather than surrender. Crunchy Frog Mar 2023 #38
of course, and that quote is from 9 years after WWII ended nt Celerity Mar 2023 #44
+1! tblue37 Mar 2023 #45
His approach is correct if people were rationally discussing things Lithos Mar 2023 #11
I disagree with Ben on this one but no boycott for me. nilram Mar 2023 #17
Tell him to talk to Hitler.. I mean Putin Cha Mar 2023 #41
...? how does he think the world should respond? renate Mar 2023 #4
we are at a point where hitler invaded Poland, if the Allies rolled over and played dead ImNotGod Mar 2023 #30
Switched to Mochi a long time ago BeyondGeography Mar 2023 #7
Let's leave the Twitter ignorance on Twitter please. In 2001, B&J was purchased by Unilever ZonkerHarris Mar 2023 #8
thought it was only partially bought. edisdead Mar 2023 #16
From Forbes Magazine ProfessorGAC Mar 2023 #33
Lifelong anti-war activists. Those boycotting them are not their people anyway. Greybnk48 Mar 2023 #9
Cohen resigned as CEO of Ben & Jerry's in 1994, and Unilever bought them in 2000. Celerity Mar 2023 #10
This is the group to which Ben & Jerry donated, as well as the experts on which it relies. Ms. Toad Mar 2023 #14
I can appreciate his stance gratuitous Mar 2023 #15
I wish we didn't have to send weapons to Ukraine either, but we had no choice when Putin invaded liberal_mama Mar 2023 #18
What if Russia had said "We can't let Bush attack Iraq" WarGamer Mar 2023 #20
I think Russia did provide some help to Iraq, but they did it on the sly liberal_mama Mar 2023 #28
I deeply appreciate his intellectual honesty and consistency... WarGamer Mar 2023 #19
Did he call for "peace negotiations" between the U.S. and Iraq? W_HAMILTON Mar 2023 #46
Well, good people do want Ukraine to prevail, and stop suffering and dying. Wingus Dingus Mar 2023 #47
He sold the company ages ago. bif Mar 2023 #23
I never liked that ice cream anyway rollin74 Mar 2023 #25
Stupid statement. I haven't bought that ice cream Raine Mar 2023 #26
Which has nothing to do with the story, since Cohen doesn't make it. brooklynite Mar 2023 #29
Yes I KNOW they don't make it anymore & I KNEW it when i Raine Mar 2023 #31
I'll never be buying their product again. Crunchy Frog Mar 2023 #32
Then You're Boycotting The Wrong Company ProfessorGAC Mar 2023 #35
I know. Still leaves a bad taste in my mouth, so to speak. Crunchy Frog Mar 2023 #39
Are you saying you have something against Unilever? muriel_volestrangler Mar 2023 #49
Easy Peasy.. it's not as if theirs is Cha Mar 2023 #36
Wow.. WTH, Ben? there's Lots More Cha Mar 2023 #34
The Ice Cream Is Irrelevant, Cha ProfessorGAC Mar 2023 #37
TY.. After reading the thread I Cha Mar 2023 #43
Peace is a good thing Bmoboy Mar 2023 #48
Peace is a good thing. Territorial conquest through military aggression is not peace. Crunchy Frog Mar 2023 #50

pwb

(12,462 posts)
1. Cohen should know Business and politics do not mix.
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 12:56 PM
Mar 2023

However he is entitled to feel strongly for Peace in the world. I will still buy his ice cream in the market on sale.

Cha

(316,842 posts)
40. "Peace" isn't Negotiating with Terrorists.
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 07:51 PM
Mar 2023

Putin has committed Genocide and is a War Criminal.. Ukraine has a Humanitarian right to Defend itself FOR Democracy & I am Grateful our Country is Helping keep the GD Murderous Maniac from Taking Over Ukraine.

Besides reading the thread Ben Cohen doesn't own his GD ice cream anymore.

 

ZonkerHarris

(25,577 posts)
2. Ben is a pacifist. Ben has used their company for many social causes. Ben is consistent.
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 01:01 PM
Mar 2023

Ben has a decades long history of supporting liberal causes.

The Magistrate

(96,043 posts)
3. Putin Invading Ukraine Is Hardly A 'Liberal Cause', Sir...
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 01:08 PM
Mar 2023

Neutrality in a war is simply support for the side with the most artillery, and pacifist agitation directed at one party to a conflict aids the other side, at least to the degree it has any effect, and is always useful to the other side's propagandas.


Jirel

(2,369 posts)
5. This.
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 01:14 PM
Mar 2023

A pacifist tries to prevent war. A pacifist does not passively accept a war of naked aggression by a nation with a habit of such things, then urge the defeat the invaded nation to create “peace.”

The Magistrate

(96,043 posts)
12. Even The Comic Strip Character Does Better Than That, Sir
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 01:45 PM
Mar 2023

You have made no point, only some noise.

Personally, not much inclined to drum solos. This is better:

Celerity

(53,701 posts)
13. I am so stealing this (with your permission of course, lol)
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 01:45 PM
Mar 2023
everybody likes to dance when the war drums play that beat


Killing Joke - Wardance (1980)



Label: Malicious Damage – MD5.40
Format: Vinyl, 7", 45 RPM, Single, Copyright Control
Country: UK
Released: 1980
Genre: Rock
Style: New Wave, Punk










Response to Celerity (Reply #13)

Celerity

(53,701 posts)
22. I do not think that being anti-war (as a initial philosophical premiss) is 'leftist extremism'
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 03:14 PM
Mar 2023

Even a reactionary conservative imperialist like Winston Churchill said 'It is better to jaw-jaw than to war-war’.


An aside, that quote is somewhat disputed as to the exact wording:

https://www.bartleby.com/lit-hub/respectfully-quoted/sir-winston-leonard-spencer-churchill-18741965-36/


NUMBER: 1914

AUTHOR: Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874–1965)

QUOTATION: To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war.

ATTRIBUTION: WINSTON CHURCHILL, remarks at a White House luncheon, June 26, 1954. His exact words are not known, because the meetings and the luncheon that day were closed to reporters, but above is the commonly cited version.

His words are quoted as “It is ‘better to jaw-jaw than to war-war,’” in the sub-heading on p. 1 of The New York Times, June 27, 1954, and as “To jaw-jaw always is better than to war-war” on p. 3.

The Washington Post in its June 27 issue, p. 1, has “better to talk jaw to jaw than have war,” and The Star, Washington, D.C., p. 1, a slight variation, “It is better to talk jaw to jaw than to have war.”



Response to Celerity (Reply #22)

Response to Celerity (Reply #22)

Crunchy Frog

(28,214 posts)
38. Nevertheless, he still chose to fight Hitler rather than surrender.
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 07:46 PM
Mar 2023

I'll never condemn him for making that choice, even though there's lots of other things to condemn him for. Nor will I condemn the US for choosing to assist him.

Lithos

(26,603 posts)
11. His approach is correct if people were rationally discussing things
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 01:37 PM
Mar 2023

That time has passed. At this time, his no vote is a vote for the one who has the most munitions - which is Russia. Anyone who knows a thing about Russia means this is a tacit support of Fascism.

nilram

(3,471 posts)
17. I disagree with Ben on this one but no boycott for me.
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 02:25 PM
Mar 2023

Because he is so usually on the right side of things. (By which I mean, the lefty side of things.)

Cha

(316,842 posts)
41. Tell him to talk to Hitler.. I mean Putin
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 07:56 PM
Mar 2023

then..

Ukraine has an Humanitarian Right to Defend Itself against a Genocidal Invader.

I am Grateful our Country is Helping to Save LIVES in Ukraine and Keep Back Fascism from Spreading in that part of the world.

renate

(13,776 posts)
4. ...? how does he think the world should respond?
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 01:11 PM
Mar 2023

I respect completely his consistency as a pacifist, but does he really prefer that invaded countries roll over and show their bellies?

I cannot imagine a reasonable person donating $1 million to essentially promote and encourage Putin's human-rights-violating invasion.

ImNotGod

(1,194 posts)
30. we are at a point where hitler invaded Poland, if the Allies rolled over and played dead
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 04:42 PM
Mar 2023

the World would be a much dangerous place right now. There are times when you have to stand your ground to fight evil and putin is about as evil as they come. The ice cream man is being played like a cheap piano.

 

ZonkerHarris

(25,577 posts)
8. Let's leave the Twitter ignorance on Twitter please. In 2001, B&J was purchased by Unilever
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 01:26 PM
Mar 2023

Cohen is no longer with the company.
Hasn't been for decades
Fools on the internet

ProfessorGAC

(75,859 posts)
33. From Forbes Magazine
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 07:37 PM
Mar 2023
Unilever owns 100 percent of the equity capital of Ben & Jerry's.Aug 23, 2022

Greybnk48

(10,668 posts)
9. Lifelong anti-war activists. Those boycotting them are not their people anyway.
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 01:30 PM
Mar 2023

They don't know them at all, apparently.

Celerity

(53,701 posts)
10. Cohen resigned as CEO of Ben & Jerry's in 1994, and Unilever bought them in 2000.
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 01:36 PM
Mar 2023

Cohen also left the Board of Directors years ago. He has no power at the firm.


Ben Cohen To Step Down as CEO of Ben & Jerry’s

June 14, 1994

https://apnews.com/article/fec419795f6371d6f8d2726d0d41645a


PASSING THE SCOOP; BEN & JERRY

Dec. 18, 1994

https://www.nytimes.com/1994/12/18/magazine/passing-the-scoop-ben-jerry.html

Ms. Toad

(38,308 posts)
14. This is the group to which Ben & Jerry donated, as well as the experts on which it relies.
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 02:04 PM
Mar 2023
https://eisenhowermedianetwork.org/experts/

If you follow the link, you can see that the group relies on advice from people who are extremely familar with waging war. Likely far more familiar than those condemning Cohen for the donation.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
15. I can appreciate his stance
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 02:08 PM
Mar 2023

But what is there to negotiate? How much of Ukraine Putin should be gifted for starting a war on Ukraine? That seems to be rewarding Russia for its military aggression, which I don't think Cohen wants to encourage. A complete withdrawal of Russian troops and mercenaries from Ukrainian soil (including Donbas and Crimea)? I think that's what most of the civilized world wants, but how to accomplish it?

Cohen and his Eisenhower Media Network outfit seem to say that the U.S. is providing too much military assistance to Ukraine, especially in light of the deficit (yeah, ). What then, is the proper amount of military assistance? Nobody seems willing to be that specific.

liberal_mama

(1,495 posts)
18. I wish we didn't have to send weapons to Ukraine either, but we had no choice when Putin invaded
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 02:41 PM
Mar 2023

them. It's very unfortunate. I wish the money spent on the weapons could have fed the hungry and built tiny houses for the homeless, but we can't just let Russia attack Ukraine.

WarGamer

(18,256 posts)
20. What if Russia had said "We can't let Bush attack Iraq"
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 02:52 PM
Mar 2023

And started supplying the insurgents with ToS rockets, MANPADS and Russian satellites guided Iraqi artillery attacks?

liberal_mama

(1,495 posts)
28. I think Russia did provide some help to Iraq, but they did it on the sly
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 04:22 PM
Mar 2023

I'm worried about all this. Makes me concerned about WW3 happening.

WarGamer

(18,256 posts)
19. I deeply appreciate his intellectual honesty and consistency...
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 02:51 PM
Mar 2023

Some "anti-war" folks are pleasuring themselves over Ukraine War "Helmet Cam" videos and pumping their fist in joy with each piece of war news... like an Eagles fan on Sundays.

Wingus Dingus

(9,173 posts)
47. Well, good people do want Ukraine to prevail, and stop suffering and dying.
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 08:23 PM
Mar 2023

Because they did nothing wrong, and are entitled to their nation and their borders. News of Ukraine having a victory or blowing Russian troops to pieces makes my day, frankly. But then I'm not always "anti-war", some wars must be fought, some defenses must be mounted.

Bad people want Russia to win. They're the ones getting off on the carnage, the torture, the death, the destruction. And Russia is 100 percent responsible for all of that.

rollin74

(2,274 posts)
25. I never liked that ice cream anyway
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 03:40 PM
Mar 2023

Unfortunately, Ukraine doesn’t have the luxury of choosing to be anti-war. They were attacked and invaded by a murderous dictator.

Supporting and helping the victim of this war to defend themselves is the correct approach. Morally,it’s the right thing to do.

Putin has the power to end the war today by withdrawing his damn troops.

Raine

(31,095 posts)
26. Stupid statement. I haven't bought that ice cream
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 03:43 PM
Mar 2023

for years, I always thought it was way overpriced.

Raine

(31,095 posts)
31. Yes I KNOW they don't make it anymore & I KNEW it when i
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 07:31 PM
Mar 2023

responded it was just an aside, geesh!

ProfessorGAC

(75,859 posts)
35. Then You're Boycotting The Wrong Company
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 07:38 PM
Mar 2023

Unilever bought 100% of the business 23 years ago.

muriel_volestrangler

(105,579 posts)
49. Are you saying you have something against Unilever?
Tue Mar 21, 2023, 06:24 AM
Mar 2023

Or that you hold Unilever responsible for the present-day politics of someone they bought a company from 2 decades ago?

Cha

(316,842 posts)
36. Easy Peasy.. it's not as if theirs is
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 07:39 PM
Mar 2023

the only Ice Cream.

ETA.. okay I just read Ben doesn't own his fucking ice cream anymore.

Cha

(316,842 posts)
34. Wow.. WTH, Ben? there's Lots More
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 07:38 PM
Mar 2023

other Delicious Ice Creams, you know.

ETA.. okay I just read Ben doesn't own his fucking ice cream anymore.

ProfessorGAC

(75,859 posts)
37. The Ice Cream Is Irrelevant, Cha
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 07:40 PM
Mar 2023

Unilever has owned the brand for 23 years.
Cohen has had nothing to do with it in a long time.

Bmoboy

(608 posts)
48. Peace is a good thing
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 08:36 PM
Mar 2023

War!

(War, huh) Yeah!
(What is it good for?) Absolutely nothing, uhuh
(War, huh) Yeah!
(What is it good for?) Absolutely nothing

Norman Whitfiled and Barrett Strong 1969

Crunchy Frog

(28,214 posts)
50. Peace is a good thing. Territorial conquest through military aggression is not peace.
Tue Mar 21, 2023, 01:11 PM
Mar 2023

Military occupation that includes systematic rapes, arbitrary imprisonment, torture, disappearances, forced deportations, and large scale child abductions is also not peace.

Self defense against aggression has always been regarded as legitimate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ben & Jerry's Faces Boyco...