General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBen & Jerry's Faces Boycott Calls Over Founder's Stance on Ukraine Weapons
Ben & Jerry's ice cream is facing boycott calls after co-founder Ben Cohen spoke out against U.S. providing military aid to Ukraine.
Cohen believes the U.S. should use its power to negotiate an end to the war instead of supplying weapons.
This isn't the first time Ben & Jerry's has faced backlash for its social views, with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis taking a harsh stance against the company in 2021.
https://www.newsweek.com/ben-jerrys-faces-boycott-calls-over-founders-stance-ukraine-weapons-1788962
Ben Cohen has donated more than $1 million to a group campaigning to turn the U.S. public against President Biden's military support for Ukraine
Sounds like they are serving russian kool aid with their ice cream
pwb
(12,462 posts)However he is entitled to feel strongly for Peace in the world. I will still buy his ice cream in the market on sale.
Cha
(316,842 posts)Putin has committed Genocide and is a War Criminal.. Ukraine has a Humanitarian right to Defend itself FOR Democracy & I am Grateful our Country is Helping keep the GD Murderous Maniac from Taking Over Ukraine.
Besides reading the thread Ben Cohen doesn't own his GD ice cream anymore.
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)Ben has a decades long history of supporting liberal causes.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)Neutrality in a war is simply support for the side with the most artillery, and pacifist agitation directed at one party to a conflict aids the other side, at least to the degree it has any effect, and is always useful to the other side's propagandas.
A pacifist tries to prevent war. A pacifist does not passively accept a war of naked aggression by a nation with a habit of such things, then urge the defeat the invaded nation to create peace.
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)You have made no point, only some noise.
Personally, not much inclined to drum solos. This is better:
Cha
(316,842 posts)Celerity
(53,701 posts)Killing Joke - Wardance (1980)
Label: Malicious Damage MD5.40
Format: Vinyl, 7", 45 RPM, Single, Copyright Control
Country: UK
Released: 1980
Genre: Rock
Style: New Wave, Punk




Response to Celerity (Reply #13)
old as dirt This message was self-deleted by its author.
Celerity
(53,701 posts)Even a reactionary conservative imperialist like Winston Churchill said 'It is better to jaw-jaw than to war-war.
An aside, that quote is somewhat disputed as to the exact wording:
https://www.bartleby.com/lit-hub/respectfully-quoted/sir-winston-leonard-spencer-churchill-18741965-36/
NUMBER: 1914
AUTHOR: Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (18741965)
QUOTATION: To jaw-jaw is always better than to war-war.
ATTRIBUTION: WINSTON CHURCHILL, remarks at a White House luncheon, June 26, 1954. His exact words are not known, because the meetings and the luncheon that day were closed to reporters, but above is the commonly cited version.
His words are quoted as It is better to jaw-jaw than to war-war, in the sub-heading on p. 1 of The New York Times, June 27, 1954, and as To jaw-jaw always is better than to war-war on p. 3.
The Washington Post in its June 27 issue, p. 1, has better to talk jaw to jaw than have war, and The Star, Washington, D.C., p. 1, a slight variation, It is better to talk jaw to jaw than to have war.
Response to Celerity (Reply #22)
old as dirt This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Celerity (Reply #22)
old as dirt This message was self-deleted by its author.
Crunchy Frog
(28,214 posts)I'll never condemn him for making that choice, even though there's lots of other things to condemn him for. Nor will I condemn the US for choosing to assist him.
Celerity
(53,701 posts)tblue37
(68,198 posts)Lithos
(26,603 posts)That time has passed. At this time, his no vote is a vote for the one who has the most munitions - which is Russia. Anyone who knows a thing about Russia means this is a tacit support of Fascism.
nilram
(3,471 posts)Because he is so usually on the right side of things. (By which I mean, the lefty side of things.)
Cha
(316,842 posts)then..
Ukraine has an Humanitarian Right to Defend Itself against a Genocidal Invader.
I am Grateful our Country is Helping to Save LIVES in Ukraine and Keep Back Fascism from Spreading in that part of the world.
renate
(13,776 posts)I respect completely his consistency as a pacifist, but does he really prefer that invaded countries roll over and show their bellies?
I cannot imagine a reasonable person donating $1 million to essentially promote and encourage Putin's human-rights-violating invasion.
ImNotGod
(1,194 posts)the World would be a much dangerous place right now. There are times when you have to stand your ground to fight evil and putin is about as evil as they come. The ice cream man is being played like a cheap piano.
BeyondGeography
(40,817 posts)I was never going back anyway. Shove it, Ben.
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)Cohen is no longer with the company.
Hasn't been for decades
Fools on the internet
edisdead
(3,396 posts)ProfessorGAC
(75,859 posts)Greybnk48
(10,668 posts)They don't know them at all, apparently.
Celerity
(53,701 posts)Cohen also left the Board of Directors years ago. He has no power at the firm.
Ben Cohen To Step Down as CEO of Ben & Jerrys
June 14, 1994
https://apnews.com/article/fec419795f6371d6f8d2726d0d41645a
PASSING THE SCOOP; BEN & JERRY
Dec. 18, 1994
https://www.nytimes.com/1994/12/18/magazine/passing-the-scoop-ben-jerry.html
Ms. Toad
(38,308 posts)If you follow the link, you can see that the group relies on advice from people who are extremely familar with waging war. Likely far more familiar than those condemning Cohen for the donation.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)But what is there to negotiate? How much of Ukraine Putin should be gifted for starting a war on Ukraine? That seems to be rewarding Russia for its military aggression, which I don't think Cohen wants to encourage. A complete withdrawal of Russian troops and mercenaries from Ukrainian soil (including Donbas and Crimea)? I think that's what most of the civilized world wants, but how to accomplish it?
Cohen and his Eisenhower Media Network outfit seem to say that the U.S. is providing too much military assistance to Ukraine, especially in light of the deficit (yeah,
). What then, is the proper amount of military assistance? Nobody seems willing to be that specific.
liberal_mama
(1,495 posts)them. It's very unfortunate. I wish the money spent on the weapons could have fed the hungry and built tiny houses for the homeless, but we can't just let Russia attack Ukraine.
WarGamer
(18,256 posts)And started supplying the insurgents with ToS rockets, MANPADS and Russian satellites guided Iraqi artillery attacks?
liberal_mama
(1,495 posts)I'm worried about all this. Makes me concerned about WW3 happening.
WarGamer
(18,256 posts)Some "anti-war" folks are pleasuring themselves over Ukraine War "Helmet Cam" videos and pumping their fist in joy with each piece of war news... like an Eagles fan on Sundays.
W_HAMILTON
(10,083 posts)Wingus Dingus
(9,173 posts)Because they did nothing wrong, and are entitled to their nation and their borders. News of Ukraine having a victory or blowing Russian troops to pieces makes my day, frankly. But then I'm not always "anti-war", some wars must be fought, some defenses must be mounted.
Bad people want Russia to win. They're the ones getting off on the carnage, the torture, the death, the destruction. And Russia is 100 percent responsible for all of that.
bif
(26,673 posts)So a boycott is pointless.
rollin74
(2,274 posts)Unfortunately, Ukraine doesnt have the luxury of choosing to be anti-war. They were attacked and invaded by a murderous dictator.
Supporting and helping the victim of this war to defend themselves is the correct approach. Morally,its the right thing to do.
Putin has the power to end the war today by withdrawing his damn troops.
Raine
(31,095 posts)for years, I always thought it was way overpriced.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Raine
(31,095 posts)responded it was just an aside, geesh!
Crunchy Frog
(28,214 posts)ProfessorGAC
(75,859 posts)Unilever bought 100% of the business 23 years ago.
Crunchy Frog
(28,214 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(105,579 posts)Or that you hold Unilever responsible for the present-day politics of someone they bought a company from 2 decades ago?
Cha
(316,842 posts)the only Ice Cream.
ETA.. okay I just read Ben doesn't own his fucking ice cream anymore.
Cha
(316,842 posts)other Delicious Ice Creams, you know.
ETA.. okay I just read Ben doesn't own his fucking ice cream anymore.
ProfessorGAC
(75,859 posts)Unilever has owned the brand for 23 years.
Cohen has had nothing to do with it in a long time.
Cha
(316,842 posts)just ETA my two posts on this.
Bmoboy
(608 posts)War!
(War, huh) Yeah!
(What is it good for?) Absolutely nothing, uhuh
(War, huh) Yeah!
(What is it good for?) Absolutely nothing
Norman Whitfiled and Barrett Strong 1969
Crunchy Frog
(28,214 posts)Military occupation that includes systematic rapes, arbitrary imprisonment, torture, disappearances, forced deportations, and large scale child abductions is also not peace.
Self defense against aggression has always been regarded as legitimate.