General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP Weighs Protecting Trump with New Law
GOP Weighs Protecting Trump with New Law
March 26, 2023 at 10:58 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 89 Comments
https://politicalwire.com/2023/03/26/gop-weighs-protecting-trump-with-new-law/
"SNIP.......
A trio of House Republican committee chairs say the House of Representatives could soon take up legislation to strip state and local prosecutors of the authority to prosecute former presidents in response to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Braggs potential indictment of former president Donald Trump, The Independent reports.
In a letter to Mr Bragg, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, and House Administration Committee Chair Bryan Steil rejected arguments the Manhattan prosecutor gave in response to the trios demand that he give evidence before their panels about the ongoing investigation into Mr Trump.
........SNIP"
louis-t
(23,292 posts)But it keeps the rubes happy to talk about it. Oh, and I'm sure this wouldn't apply to Democrats.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,369 posts)it would never pass the Senate and Pres. Biden would veto it, but what the hell, waste more taxpayer money on this bullshit.
Kaleva
(36,298 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)There is not a single reasonable person in the party anymore.
Kaleva
(36,298 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,369 posts)MyOwnPeace
(16,926 posts)after the 2022 elections and what happened to Rupukes who dared to think anything nasty about tRump (see:Liz Cheney).
kimbutgar
(21,137 posts)The GOP
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)They only like them when it benefits them. Constitution Schmonstitution.
Firestorm49
(4,032 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Not even the Dirty 6 would truck with this nonsense. Well, Thomas might of course, but he'd be the only one.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,369 posts)So far, the SCOTUS has shown very little interest in protecting Benedict Donald, as evidenced by their refusal to hear any of his stolen election bullshit.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)This country really has become a fascist cesspool.
2naSalit
(86,586 posts)And going nowhere.
Firestorm49
(4,032 posts)This is so absurd that it pains me to even read it. We seem to sink into the abyss more every day. If only things were reversed.
tanyev
(42,552 posts)spanone
(135,830 posts)Midnight Writer
(21,753 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,956 posts)Goodheart
(5,321 posts)Trumpdumper
(171 posts)No chance it would ever become "law," but even if so, every federal district judge with the exception of Aileen Cannon would find such a statute unconstitutional. SCOTUS would scotch it either 8-1 or 9-0, depending on how hypocritical and intellectually dishonest Clarence was feeling that day.
MyOwnPeace
(16,926 posts)dear Judge Aileen Cannon! What a screaming disgrace on the integrity of the entire judicial branch of the United States (well, OK, Uncle Clarence has her beat, but thats another sore spot).
We have SO much to clean up after the tRump regime.
Liberal In Texas
(13,548 posts)It would make as much sense and wouldn't have any more chance of passing than this idiotic thing.
Response to applegrove (Original post)
Initech This message was self-deleted by its author.
Initech
(100,068 posts)Truly an embarrassment to this country.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Has the GOP Moron Caucus forgotten that laws have to be passed in BOTH houses of Congress, and then signed by the President?
Sure sounds like it.