Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,642 posts)
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 12:05 PM Mar 2023

GOP Weighs Protecting Trump with New Law

GOP Weighs Protecting Trump with New Law

March 26, 2023 at 10:58 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 89 Comments

https://politicalwire.com/2023/03/26/gop-weighs-protecting-trump-with-new-law/

"SNIP.......

“A trio of House Republican committee chairs say the House of Representatives could soon take up legislation to strip state and local prosecutors of the authority to prosecute former presidents in response to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s potential indictment of former president Donald Trump,” The Independent reports.

“In a letter to Mr Bragg, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan, Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, and House Administration Committee Chair Bryan Steil rejected arguments the Manhattan prosecutor gave in response to the trio’s demand that he give evidence before their panels about the ongoing investigation into Mr Trump.”

........SNIP"

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP Weighs Protecting Trump with New Law (Original Post) applegrove Mar 2023 OP
A 'new law' that they will never get passed. louis-t Mar 2023 #1
Good luck with that assholes, MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2023 #2
This isn't the GOP. It's a few members of the GOP Kaleva Mar 2023 #3
All members of the GOP are the same. Marius25 Mar 2023 #9
I doubt we'll see every R in Congress support this. Kaleva Mar 2023 #14
Agreed. nt MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2023 #15
No, they've all become spineless... MyOwnPeace Mar 2023 #25
They need the talking points to spout on Fox to keep rubes calm and send more money to TFG and kimbutgar Mar 2023 #4
So much for "state's rights," eh? GoCubsGo Mar 2023 #5
"Constitution, Schmonstitution"........Love it and still laughing. Thanks! Firestorm49 Mar 2023 #12
Even if it did somehow pass I doubt it would pass muster at SCOTUS Hugh_Lebowski Mar 2023 #6
Yep. MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2023 #8
This is astronomical levels of corruption. Marius25 Mar 2023 #7
Weighs about as much as a lead balloon... 2naSalit Mar 2023 #10
By all means, dim witted Republicans, let's move to condone law breaking Presidents. 🖕 Firestorm49 Mar 2023 #11
A law they would instantly rescind if they saw an opportunity for a Dem president to be prosecuted. tanyev Mar 2023 #13
Fucking criminals running the house. spanone Mar 2023 #16
In other words, under this bill Trump could shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue and walk free. Midnight Writer Mar 2023 #17
Jordan and Comer must be sniffing each other's farts. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2023 #18
Unconstitutional Goodheart Mar 2023 #19
Clear violation of federalism on so many levels. Trumpdumper Mar 2023 #20
Points for even REMEMBERING MyOwnPeace Mar 2023 #26
Why don't they just draft a law to make TFG emperor for life? Liberal In Texas Mar 2023 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Initech Mar 2023 #22
Jim Jordan is such a colossal piece of shit. Initech Mar 2023 #23
Yeah...OK...well, then... MineralMan Mar 2023 #24

louis-t

(23,292 posts)
1. A 'new law' that they will never get passed.
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 12:08 PM
Mar 2023

But it keeps the rubes happy to talk about it. Oh, and I'm sure this wouldn't apply to Democrats.

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,369 posts)
2. Good luck with that assholes,
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 12:11 PM
Mar 2023

it would never pass the Senate and Pres. Biden would veto it, but what the hell, waste more taxpayer money on this bullshit.

 

Marius25

(3,213 posts)
9. All members of the GOP are the same.
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 12:31 PM
Mar 2023

There is not a single reasonable person in the party anymore.

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
25. No, they've all become spineless...
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 03:06 PM
Mar 2023

after the 2022 elections and what happened to Rupukes who dared to ‘think’ anything nasty about tRump (see:Liz Cheney).

GoCubsGo

(32,080 posts)
5. So much for "state's rights," eh?
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 12:19 PM
Mar 2023

They only like them when it benefits them. Constitution Schmonstitution.

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
6. Even if it did somehow pass I doubt it would pass muster at SCOTUS
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 12:28 PM
Mar 2023

Not even the Dirty 6 would truck with this nonsense. Well, Thomas might of course, but he'd be the only one.

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,369 posts)
8. Yep.
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 12:31 PM
Mar 2023

So far, the SCOTUS has shown very little interest in protecting Benedict Donald, as evidenced by their refusal to hear any of his stolen election bullshit.

Firestorm49

(4,032 posts)
11. By all means, dim witted Republicans, let's move to condone law breaking Presidents. 🖕
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 12:48 PM
Mar 2023

This is so absurd that it pains me to even read it. We seem to sink into the abyss more every day. If only things were reversed.

Trumpdumper

(171 posts)
20. Clear violation of federalism on so many levels.
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 02:32 PM
Mar 2023

No chance it would ever become "law," but even if so, every federal district judge with the exception of Aileen Cannon would find such a statute unconstitutional. SCOTUS would scotch it either 8-1 or 9-0, depending on how hypocritical and intellectually dishonest Clarence was feeling that day.

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
26. Points for even REMEMBERING
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 03:21 PM
Mar 2023

dear ‘Judge’ Aileen Cannon! What a screaming disgrace on the integrity of the entire judicial branch of the United States (well, OK, ‘Uncle Clarence’ has her beat, but that’s another sore spot).
We have SO much to clean up after the tRump regime.

Liberal In Texas

(13,548 posts)
21. Why don't they just draft a law to make TFG emperor for life?
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 02:39 PM
Mar 2023

It would make as much sense and wouldn't have any more chance of passing than this idiotic thing.

Response to applegrove (Original post)

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
24. Yeah...OK...well, then...
Sun Mar 26, 2023, 02:46 PM
Mar 2023

Has the GOP Moron Caucus forgotten that laws have to be passed in BOTH houses of Congress, and then signed by the President?

Sure sounds like it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP Weighs Protecting Tru...