The line between legitimate legislative actions and obstruction of justice

[drray23]

Where is that line?

We have seen republicans overtly threatening Alvin Bragg with various consequences if he persists. Jim Jordan has been trying to get him in front of his committee, McCarthy publicly added pressure but stating it was scandalous that Trump be indicted, etc...

Now, if a regular citizen was openly trying to interfere or threaten the DA, he/she could be charged with obstruction. Here, we are dealing with elected officials. How much leeway do they have? Can they just continue this behavior and be completely free from consequences? At which point does it cross the line between free speech or legislating and obstruction?

[ananda]

1. For the dark side, there is no line.

No bar too low for republicans.

[drray23]

2. indeed. but the real question is where is the line for the DOJ and Bragg?

[Irish_Dem]

5. We can see where the respective DOJ and Bragg lines are located with perfect clarity.

Two completely different lines.

[Irish_Dem]

4. For those who make the rules, there are no rules.

[paleotn]

6. Let them rant. It's their right, but makes no difference.

But if they use their position and power to actually shape or hinder prosecution or the courts, that's going too far. I wonder how much of that is being attempted behind the scenes? Luckily, since this is a state matter in a deeply blue state, so they've got little recourse other than bluster. And publicly, they're in such an indefensible position it's comical.