Looks like the legal experts were wrong about Aileen Cannon

[Marius25]

Link to tweet

?s=20

She's not going to recuse, and it's unlikely Jack Smith will go through the effort to remove her, so she will be the trial judge. That means it's guaranteed that the trial will favor Trump, evidence will likely be rejected, and even if he's somehow convicted, she will probably give him probation.

[Lovie777]

1. If she doesn't recuse from the case.....................

and from pass behaviors which she may conitune to act on in favor of Trump then I think she can be removed.

[TheBlackAdder]

2. She may view herself as the firewall protecting Trump, and willing to take the heat for his freedom.

[yourout]

3. Earning her bones.

[TheBlackAdder]

10. Lots and lots of them.

[bluestarone]

4. Why all the negativity?

No proof, but you STILL continue?

[Marius25]

5. We have the Clerk of the Court confirming she will be the Judge

[LakeArenal]

6. Been posting this negativity elsewhere.

Nobody knows anything at this point.

[bluestarone]

7. EXACTLY

I'll continue to listen to our lawyers on board! I'm 100% sure the DOJ knows exactly what they are doing!!

[PortTack]

8. Thank you!

[Kingofalldems]

15. It's taunting in my opinion.

[MarineCombatEngineer]

16. I agree,

it's taunting and trolling.

[moniss]

9. So what because if Smith wants to he can

move the case to NJ because when the Orange Ruski took the boxes to Bedminster he also made that a venue for the crime.

[yardwork]

12. How many separate threads will you start on this?

[MarineCombatEngineer]

13. You can't guarantee shit,

all you're doing here is bloviating.

[Kingofalldems]

14. Maybe you could combine both of your threads on Aileen Cannon.

One is enough, don't you think?