General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumssinkingfeeling
(57,276 posts)allegorical oracle
(6,203 posts)RockRaven
(18,754 posts)Or do the searchers have sufficient resolution with whatever their techniques and equipment to determine new debris from old?
mobeau69
(12,228 posts)PCIntern
(27,984 posts)mobeau69
(12,228 posts)The phrase THE LIVING WILL ENVY THE DEAD comes to mind
Oneironaut
(6,217 posts)Its very much preferable too
For anyone who has seen the anime movie, Barefoot Gen, that sort of nightmare fuel. I would rather be gone for eternity than having to live through something like that.
Takket
(23,490 posts)I assume this is on the ocean floor and not floating in the surface?
allegorical oracle
(6,203 posts)carbon-fiber-titanium hull. And would such a hull float or sink? Heard the viewing window was plexiglass less than five inches thick.
Johonny
(25,530 posts)Under pressure release pass into people. Lost of metal reinforced carbon overwrap have been burst tested for space programs. It's pretty obvious if it happened.
obamanut2012
(29,193 posts)sarisataka
(22,245 posts)In anyway overlap Titanic's large debris field? I can't see something described as the size of a minivan having much debris.
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)But a pressure implosion wouldn't do that. A section would blow in and pressure would instantly equalize.
Even if you assume the air rushing out would break something off, it doesn't equate to a field. One or two larger pieces and a few small at most.
They must have video though. It should be pretty conclusive.
Goonch
(4,259 posts)