General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumssinkingfeeling
(57,948 posts)allegorical oracle
(6,522 posts)RockRaven
(19,679 posts)Or do the searchers have sufficient resolution with whatever their techniques and equipment to determine new debris from old?
mobeau69
(12,444 posts)PCIntern
(28,526 posts)mobeau69
(12,444 posts)The phrase THE LIVING WILL ENVY THE DEAD comes to mind
Oneironaut
(6,317 posts)Its very much preferable too
For anyone who has seen the anime movie, Barefoot Gen, that sort of nightmare fuel. I would rather be gone for eternity than having to live through something like that.
Takket
(23,775 posts)I assume this is on the ocean floor and not floating in the surface?
allegorical oracle
(6,522 posts)carbon-fiber-titanium hull. And would such a hull float or sink? Heard the viewing window was plexiglass less than five inches thick.
Johonny
(26,484 posts)Under pressure release pass into people. Lost of metal reinforced carbon overwrap have been burst tested for space programs. It's pretty obvious if it happened.
obamanut2012
(29,487 posts)sarisataka
(22,779 posts)In anyway overlap Titanic's large debris field? I can't see something described as the size of a minivan having much debris.
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)But a pressure implosion wouldn't do that. A section would blow in and pressure would instantly equalize.
Even if you assume the air rushing out would break something off, it doesn't equate to a field. One or two larger pieces and a few small at most.
They must have video though. It should be pretty conclusive.
Goonch
(5,486 posts)