Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IEA report reminds us peak oil idea has gone up in flames (Original Post) arenean Nov 2012 OP
Time to go nuclear, whether there's too much oil or too little. David__77 Nov 2012 #1
No need to go nuclear, MadHound Nov 2012 #2
Seriously? "green renewables are fully capable of shouldering the load now" FSogol Nov 2012 #7
just as soon as you figure out where to put the toxic leftovers. Viva_La_Revolution Nov 2012 #3
We launch the waste into space on a direct path to the sun snooper2 Nov 2012 #4
and if just one launch fails like the Challenger did? Viva_La_Revolution Nov 2012 #5
So overdramatic. We can store it in volcanos! RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #6

David__77

(23,492 posts)
1. Time to go nuclear, whether there's too much oil or too little.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:26 AM
Nov 2012

We need much more and better nuclear power, and soon.

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
2. No need to go nuclear,
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 08:01 AM
Nov 2012

When green renewables are fully capable of shouldering the load now.

Besides, nuclear still can't solve those two big problems it has always faced, how to eliminate human error and what to do about radioactive waste. Until those two problems are solved, nuclear will be a dangerous dead end.

FSogol

(45,524 posts)
7. Seriously? "green renewables are fully capable of shouldering the load now"
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 09:32 AM
Nov 2012

So, we could just shut down every reactor in this country this morning without a blip in service? Really?

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
4. We launch the waste into space on a direct path to the sun
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 01:03 PM
Nov 2012

Easy Peasy!

And we take 100 billion of the defense budget for more fusion research...



http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=&imgrefurl=http://www.ccfe.ac.uk/introduction.aspx&usg=__T8BXs-Zqbwc7wtLo99IjJtbh8xs=&h=192&w=250&sz=35&hl=en&start=4&zoom=1&tbnid=8izI1YjXUUXiaM:&tbnh=85&tbnw=111&ei=53yiULa6HcvpqAHPnYCADA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dfusion%2Bpower%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26gbv%3D2%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1

Nuclear fusion is one of the most promising options for generating large amounts of carbon-free energy in the future.

Fusion is the process that heats the Sun and all other stars, where atomic nuclei collide together and release energy (in the form of neutrons, see diagram on the right). Fusion scientists and engineers are developing the technology to use this process in tomorrow's power stations.

To get energy from fusion, gas from a combination of types of hydrogen – deuterium and tritium – is heated to very high temperatures (100 million degrees Celsius). One way to achieve these conditions is a method called ‘magnetic confinement' – controlling the hot gas (known as a plasma) with strong magnets. The most promising device for this is the ‘tokamak', a Russian word for a ring-shaped magnetic chamber.



Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
5. and if just one launch fails like the Challenger did?
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:25 PM
Nov 2012

research is great, but we have to deal with the reality of Right Now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»IEA report reminds us pea...