General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRoyal Carribean's "Icon Of The Seas"
After The Titanic and most recently Covid, some people just don't learn and keep tempting fate with the oceans.
Some of the ship's features include 20 decks, 6 waterslides, 7 pools and whirlpools, and 2 805 staterooms. The cruise liner can accommodate 5610 guests and has a crew of 2 350.
https://www.news24.com/life/travel/worlds-largest-ever-cruise-ship-the-icon-of-the-seas-completes-first-sea-trials-20230707
https://www.royalcaribbean.com/icon-of-the-seas
Link to tweet
Coventina
(29,083 posts)Ugh!
The idea of a cruise like that gives me the creeps!
11 Bravo
(24,275 posts)GoCubsGo
(34,647 posts)I wouldn't mind cruising on a small ship, but t that thing looks like a bloody nightmare to be stuck on for days at at time.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)but I think it would be neat to take some kind of cruise.
Ace Rothstein
(3,369 posts)




sarisataka
(22,204 posts)For comparison the Ford class carriers are 337m and around 100,000 tons.
sir pball
(5,236 posts)It's an obscure but major difference in naval architecture terminology displacement is simply the weight of the vessel calculated by how much water it, well, displaces; gross tonnage "is a nonlinear measure of a ship's overall internal volume[
]calculated based on 'the moulded volume of all enclosed spaces of the ship' and is used to determine things such as a ship's manning regulations, safety rules, registration fees, and port dues" that "should [not] be confused with measures of mass or weight such as deadweight tonnage or displacement."
Gross tonnage numbers for military vessels aren't available since they don't need to conform to civilian regulations; I haven't seen a displacement number for the Icon but based on slightly smaller cruise boats she's probably "only" around 110-120,000 tons
bigger than a Ford-class, but hardly 2.5x as large. Most of her internal volume is empty, as opposed to a warship where empty space is wasted space.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_tonnage
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacement_(ship)
Disaffected
(6,126 posts)how would they even get a small fraction of the passengers & crew into the lifeboats?
Yavin4
(37,182 posts)James Cameron gets a sequel.
Response to Yavin4 (Original post)
BannonsLiver This message was self-deleted by its author.
haele
(15,051 posts)Where the heck can it pull into port where it won't be in the seediest dock area along with the car and Ali-Baba delivery container ships?
Oof. That thing is the product of someone grinding the Sampo a bit too much (points for those who know mythology, or MST3K...).
Haele
A HERETIC I AM
(24,841 posts)Its set up to handle these vessels.
obamanut2012
(29,150 posts)elleng
(141,926 posts)ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)Maru Kitteh
(31,218 posts)Diamond_Dog
(39,706 posts)malaise
(292,402 posts)😀
ProfessorGAC
(75,774 posts)Every vacation we ever took included waking up that morning, deciding what we would do & where we would go.
The "go" part of that doesn't exist on a cruise.
Not for us.
moonscape
(5,633 posts)hell, if I had the $$ Id even pay!
genxlib
(6,080 posts)On one hand, they represent a lot of things I don't like.
However, they are the only real low-key vacation available to me as the "planner" of the family. Taking an equivalent vacation without a cruise takes a lot of legwork, driving, scheduling, booking, and transporting. That can be exhausting to do and can really affect the quality of the vacation.
Cruises, on the other hand, are set-and-forget. Show me where to sleep, show me where to eat and take me where I need to be. It is the only type of vacation where I can actually completely unwind.
Honestly, I like the ships to be big because it gives you more options for places to eat and things to do.
The real downside is in the ports. You dump 5000 people into a small tourist town and it ruins it. Key West has never been the same since cruise ships started going there. It is just too many people in too short of a time frame.
sinkingfeeling
(57,134 posts)spend for the room/cabin.
genxlib
(6,080 posts)I guess it feels more necessary to need outside help to go island hopping than it does to just go on a land excursion.
But your point is taken. I have considered it. I guess my biggest reason for not trying them so far is it seems like they are always used by people a lot older that me. Of course, I am one of those people now but I am still in denial.
sinkingfeeling
(57,134 posts)group was my expedition to Antarctica. I was 70 and there were lots between 20 and 30.
BannonsLiver
(20,218 posts)And is just about as militantly anti-air travel as well. Anytime either comes up there are a lot of "YoU cOuLdN'T gEt Me On OnE oF ThOsE 1!!!" posts.
I feel more or less the same way you do.
csziggy
(34,189 posts)When my husband and I went to the UK, we took the Queen Elizabeth over and a Royal Caribbean monster back. I loved the QE - smaller, better (more intellectual) entertainment, and just more our style.
After a horrible flight in 1990, I swore I would only fly first class - but when I price tickets for our trip in 2019, they were $6000 each. A balcony cabin on the QE was $4800 each. The Royal Caribbean ship was even less. The QE sailed from Fort Lauderdale, stopped in New York City, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, and Iceland. We got off at the Port of Glasgow but the ship went on to Dublin and then Southhampton. The Royal Caribbean ship stopped at four Caribbean islands before returning to Fort Lauderdale.
It was nice having the extra stops. Adding two weeks each way would be hard for many people, but we had the time to do it. If I ever took a cruise in the future, I would select one with a theme and special stops along the way that fit that theme - maybe birdwatching or wildlife tours. I'd also keep to smaller ships - the Royal Caribbean was just too big and their featured entertainment is just nothing I'd want to see. We're more the lecture type that the big show type. The QE had lecturers from NASA and NOAA. Royal Caribbean had comedians and stage shows.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 12, 2023, 10:25 AM - Edit history (1)
My HS roommate is a cruise ship Captain (currently with Cunard) and once invited us on board when he was in port. Nothing appealing in the design or size.
Kennah
(14,465 posts)And I would prefer to book passage on a cargo ship
sinkingfeeling
(57,134 posts)taxi
(2,676 posts)Don't the passengers realize there is no place for them on deck and they will have to manage not seeing the sun for days on end?
edisdead
(3,396 posts)Every cruise I have been on I have gotten plenty of sun.
taxi
(2,676 posts)TxGuitar
(4,331 posts)taxi
(2,676 posts)TxGuitar
(4,331 posts)taxi
(2,676 posts)the other amenities. I served 10 years in the Navy; it's a fairly common realization that there are times when someone hasn't been above deck for days. On this ship it appears the same thing could happen.
CanonRay
(15,924 posts)yonder
(10,238 posts)Korben and Leeloo could gain the final piece to save the Universe there.
Me? I'll take a hike, maybe an overnight or two, out my favorite, little-used trail.
Red Mountain
(2,256 posts)that floats!
Mysterian
(6,155 posts)Just not my thing. I hate crowds.
NowISeetheLight
(4,002 posts)I enjoy cruising but stick with Princess. I like the older ships too, the new Royal class are kind of big for me. Princess does a decent job though.
Ziggysmom
(4,025 posts)best vacations ever. The large, modern cruise ships do not interest me at all.
617Blue
(2,188 posts)Talitha
(7,669 posts)A question, though...
In the last image of post #4, what are the green 'ladder-looking' things on the outside of the upper levels?
Hekate
(100,132 posts)Quixote1818
(31,116 posts)liberal_mama
(1,495 posts)and now I'm horrified at the thought of one. I joined all the cruise groups on Facebook (OMG, most of the people in these groups are insufferable) and browsed the cruise offerings. Every single day on these cruise groups, people post things like, "Just got back from our cruise! We caught Covid!" or "We had to spend 5 days in quarantine because we got Noro!"
Just looking at that huge cruise ship makes me feel dread. Not only because of my infectious disease worries, but a real disaster could happen with a ship that big. How would they save all those people if things went wrong? Maybe I've just watched Titanic and The Perfect Storm too many times.
Quixote1818
(31,116 posts)We were on a smaller ship of 2000 passengers. It just got boring on the ship and not enough time at each port.
Maru Kitteh
(31,218 posts)prodigitalson
(3,186 posts)the closest thing I have ever done to a cruise was an all inclusive resort thingy in Cancun. I ejoyed it a lot but not so much I did it again. It provided the decadance of at least one bar and buffett open all night that cruise ships have without having to be on a cruise ship. I'm too old to care about bar/buffett availability at 4:00 am these days.
petronius
(26,695 posts)a bucket of Legos."
Emile
(40,428 posts)BlueWaveNeverEnd
(12,720 posts)nolabear
(43,847 posts)A regular sized cruise ship is manageable and there are some themed ones that can be fun. And if youre not super adventurous its an easy way to tourist around.
There are mystery themed, rock artist themed, politics themed, etc. ones that bring together people who share interests. As Ive mentioned I went on a couple of Richard Simmons cruises in the Bahamas and Mexico. They were fun. I dont think I care to do it again though, and not on that kind of monstrosity.
Celerity
(53,580 posts)Luxury barges with private chefs and excursions like truffle hunting, hot air ballooning, canoeing, and wine tasting. Seven barges make up Afloat in France, each with its own style and size. The elegant barges cruise the waterways of Burgundy, Provence, Alsace, Champagne, Languedoc, and Franche-Comté from April to October.
On the Belmond Napoleon, guests cruise the River Saône past châteaux, rural river towns, and expansive vineyards. Stops at Montmerle, Mâcon, and Tournus offer opportunities for wine tasting and exploring a Benedictine abbey. There's a walking tour of Chalon-Sur-Sâone and time to browse through St. Jean de Losne.


























































dembotoz
(16,922 posts)pics
do we get a discount for suffering thru that?
Celerity
(53,580 posts)taxi
(2,676 posts)sakabatou
(45,746 posts)dembotoz
(16,922 posts)couple different ports, good food, good shopping on shore......visited placed i have never been.....ship did much of the traveling while i was sleeping...wake up to a new port.....a new adventure every day
this thing is too big
Kennah
(14,465 posts)
Prairie_Seagull
(4,590 posts)Chakaconcarne
(2,770 posts)sir pball
(5,236 posts)I get that a clipper bow isn't the most efficient use of space, but between the near-tumblehome hull and massive glass dome this thing looks like a Zumwalt with hydrocephalus
![]()
Buns_of_Fire
(18,996 posts)embarking, getting lost on the way to their cabin, and never be heard from again?