That he should have known the consulate was vulnerable and authorized additional security. Some even claim he deliberately allowed the four Americans to die.
There were requests for additional security for Tripoli, but not, in my understanding, for Benghazi. Since Republicans can't be bothered to look at a map, they don't know the two cities are 1000 km apart. I had one claim to me that requests for Tripoli "covered" Benghazi since they are just a little ways apart. I pointed out that security in Tripoli no more covered Benghazi than security in DC covers Cincinnati.
They also believe the President deliberately had Susan Rice lie because he wanted to pretend it was about a movie to cover up what they claim is his negligence. Never mind that McCain and Graham already have copies of the same intelligence reports that the White House and Rice received before she taped the Sunday news shows.
Before the election, their position made more sense because they wanted to make the President look bad. Graham and McCain's posturing, along with Susan Collins of all people, seems strange to me now that the election is over.
Oh, they also think the President got rid of Petraeus to keep him from spilling the beans on Benghazi. Petraeus will testify and set them straight on all of these issues, not that it will probably change anything. They are just sore losers.
= new reply since forum marked as read
