Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Wed Jan 18, 2012, 10:11 PM Jan 2012

Supreme Court Says Congress May Re-Copyright Public Domain Works

Supreme Court Says Congress May Re-Copyright Public Domain Works

Congress may take books, musical compositions and other works out of the public domain, where they can be freely used and adapted, and grant them copyright status again, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

In a 6-2 ruling, the court said that, just because material enters the public domain, it is not “territory that works may never exit.” (.pdf)

The top court was ruling on a petition by a group of orchestra conductors, educators, performers, publishers and film archivists who urged the justices to reverse an appellate court that ruled against the group, which has relied on artistic works in the public domain for their livelihoods.

They claimed that re-copyrighting public works would breach the speech rights of those who are now using those works without needing a license. There are millions of decades-old works at issue. Some of the well-known ones include H.G. Wells’ Things to Come; Fritz Lang’s Metropolis and the musical compositions of Igor Fyodorovich Stravinsky.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/01/scotus-re-copyright-decision/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Says Congress May Re-Copyright Public Domain Works (Original Post) The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
In the Times: Public Domain Works Can Be Copyrighted Anew, Supreme Court Rules marginlized Jan 2012 #1
Add that to sopa/pipa.... The Straight Story Jan 2012 #2

marginlized

(357 posts)
1. In the Times: Public Domain Works Can Be Copyrighted Anew, Supreme Court Rules
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 12:56 PM
Jan 2012

Is this the hijacking of popular culture? Who will be buying the copyrights? It will be a matter of wealth and only lead to further concentration thereof. I'm in favor of letting heirs or family (orphans and widows, etc.) of artists benefit from copyright, but my fear is that corporations will be buying control over cultural expression. Actually, it would be easy enough to limit copyright claim to family and descendants within a certain generation(s). Why not?

And what are the limits of copyright violation? How much of a quote does it take to become an "illegal performance"? If you can't quote known literature or reference popular music, film, art, etc., what does that do to your culture and freedom of expression?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Says Congre...