Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums((for now)) Appeals court upholds broad use of obstruction law that prosecutors have deployed against Trump
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/20/appeals-court-obstruction-ruling-trump-00122742Appeals court upholds broad use of obstruction law that prosecutors have deployed against Trump
(snip)
By KYLE CHENEY and JOSH GERSTEIN
10/20/2023 12:37 PM EDT
Federal prosecutors on Friday narrowly avoided an appeals court ruling that could have upended their criminal prosecution of Donald Trump, but the legal battle will continue over a federal obstruction statute that has become a cornerstone of cases stemming from the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
A divided panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a long-awaited opinion, ruled that there are numerous ways for the government to prove that Jan. 6 defendants acted corruptly when seeking to obstruct Congress proceedings. The decision is a bullet dodged for special counsel Jack Smith, because a D.C. Circuit ruling that narrowly construed the meaning of corruptly could have derailed Smiths prosecution of Trump on an obstruction charge.
The judges ruled, 2-1, that efforts by some Jan. 6 defendants to sharply limit the conduct covered by the federal obstruction law were misguided. The ruling, which upheld a jury conviction for former Virginia police officer Thomas Robertson, concluded that efforts to install the losing presidential candidate could be enough to support an obstruction conviction.
The opinion is likely to be appealed to the full bench of the D.C. Circuit or to the Supreme Court. But it nevertheless is an important milestone with repercussions for hundreds of Jan. 6 prosecutions, including Trumps. The judges have labored for months to navigate the complexities of the federal obstruction of an official proceeding statute, a felony with a 20-year maximum sentence that was passed in the wake of the Enron scandal.
(snip)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 310 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
((for now)) Appeals court upholds broad use of obstruction law that prosecutors have deployed against Trump (Original Post)
nitpicked
Oct 2023
OP
The courts need to stop assisting the malifactors by acting as if legal minutia
Karadeniz
Oct 2023
#2
LiberalFighter
(51,084 posts)1. I wonder if it reaches the Supreme Court
whether they would consider the consequences by reversing the obstruction charges. How it may apply to them?
Karadeniz
(22,572 posts)2. The courts need to stop assisting the malifactors by acting as if legal minutia
carries the same weight as the overarching truth of the charges.