Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nitpicked

(267 posts)
Fri Oct 20, 2023, 01:18 PM Oct 2023

((for now)) Appeals court upholds broad use of obstruction law that prosecutors have deployed against Trump

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/20/appeals-court-obstruction-ruling-trump-00122742

Appeals court upholds broad use of obstruction law that prosecutors have deployed against Trump
(snip)

By KYLE CHENEY and JOSH GERSTEIN
10/20/2023 12:37 PM EDT

Federal prosecutors on Friday narrowly avoided an appeals court ruling that could have upended their criminal prosecution of Donald Trump, but the legal battle will continue over a federal obstruction statute that has become a cornerstone of cases stemming from the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

A divided panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a long-awaited opinion, ruled that there are numerous ways for the government to prove that Jan. 6 defendants acted “corruptly” when seeking to obstruct Congress’ proceedings. The decision is a bullet dodged for special counsel Jack Smith, because a D.C. Circuit ruling that narrowly construed the meaning of “corruptly” could have derailed Smith’s prosecution of Trump on an obstruction charge.

The judges ruled, 2-1, that efforts by some Jan. 6 defendants to sharply limit the conduct covered by the federal obstruction law were misguided. The ruling, which upheld a jury conviction for former Virginia police officer Thomas Robertson, concluded that efforts to install the losing presidential candidate could be enough to support an obstruction conviction.

The opinion is likely to be appealed to the full bench of the D.C. Circuit or to the Supreme Court. But it nevertheless is an important milestone with repercussions for hundreds of Jan. 6 prosecutions, including Trump’s. The judges have labored for months to navigate the complexities of the federal “obstruction of an official proceeding” statute, a felony with a 20-year maximum sentence that was passed in the wake of the Enron scandal.
(snip)
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
((for now)) Appeals court upholds broad use of obstruction law that prosecutors have deployed against Trump (Original Post) nitpicked Oct 2023 OP
I wonder if it reaches the Supreme Court LiberalFighter Oct 2023 #1
The courts need to stop assisting the malifactors by acting as if legal minutia Karadeniz Oct 2023 #2

LiberalFighter

(51,084 posts)
1. I wonder if it reaches the Supreme Court
Fri Oct 20, 2023, 01:28 PM
Oct 2023

whether they would consider the consequences by reversing the obstruction charges. How it may apply to them?

Karadeniz

(22,572 posts)
2. The courts need to stop assisting the malifactors by acting as if legal minutia
Fri Oct 20, 2023, 01:43 PM
Oct 2023

carries the same weight as the overarching truth of the charges.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»((for now)) Appeals court...