Yes, beyond that bland Yahoo! link in the OP, it's a Telegraph article (like the Daily Mail for people who like to think they understand semicolons). I'd point out it's written by Joe Barnes, the paper's Brussels Correspondent, not a military analyst, but that might make the OP sad, so I'll go no further with ad hominems and allow Joe the cover that he didn't write the headline.
Early on, the article seems to think that Russian EW countermeasures are something new in this war. They're not, they've just tended not to work very well, though there were excited stories in the summer in some of the more Russia-enthusiastic press about the number of Ukrainian drones the Russians were reportedly downing. A year ago, there were complaints from Russian troops that they'd managed to jam themselves into being unable to function in certain areas of the fronts.
There are plenty of videos on Twitter and elsewhere of Ukrainian FPV drones zeroing in on Russian tanks etc. with their EW antennae in plain sight, and more than a few smoking wrecks sporting the same equipment. Some of those smoking wrecks have been the major EW installations the article mentions.
Don't take my word for it, here's a real specialist defence journalist, David Axe, writing in Forbes about one aspect of the EW battle:
More And More Russian Vehicles Have Drone-Jammers. Ukrainian Drones Blow Them Up Anyway.
Russian industry developed the RP-377 jammer to interfere with enemy soldiers’ radio communications. As it happens, the jammer also works against radio-controlled first-person-view drones.
But only at very short range. And that helps to explain why Ukrainian drone-pilots have been blowing up Russian vehicles sporting RP-377s. A skilled operator can aim their drone at a vehicle, and count on the drone’s momentum to propel it to a successful strike even as its radio control link drops out in the final few seconds of its flight.
...
RP-377s have showed up on more and more Russian vehicles. But while Russian jamming is a growing problem for Ukraine’s drones, just as
Ukrainian jamming is a growing problem for
Russia’s drones, the RP-377s don’t appear to be the biggest contributor to this increasingly hostile electromagnetic environment.
Videos abound of Ukrainian drone-operators blowing up Russian vehicles wearing RP-377s in the jammers’ distinctive backpacks. In at least one case, a Ukrainian drone-operator struck an RP-377-equipped BMP fighting vehicle ...
on its RP-377.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/12/22/more-and-more-russian-vehicles-have-drone-jammers-ukrainian-drones-blow-them-up-anyway/
As he points out, the developments in this field are not one-sided, as you'd expect - like all but the most unbalanced and primitive conflicts, there's always the thrust and parry of the arms race and asymmetrical warfare. The Russian EW systems are still not as reliable as the article would have you believe, though there's no doubt they've improved, and their deployment is patchy.
In their turn, the Ukrainians are obviously looking for solutions - one is to use Starshield (the military brand of Starlink) on drones, which the Russians will have more problems jamming, though the expense per unit probably means that will be restricted to key strategic strikes. Given their ingenuity, I wouldn't bet against them coming up with out-of-the-box countermeasures of their own. Who'd have thought of reinforced cardboard drones in warfare until an Australian company invented them and the Ukrainians successfully deployed them?
None of this denies that Ukraine is hard pressed and desperately needs continuing support, from its neighbours, the rest of Europe, allies in other parts of the world, and the US. The US economy has benefited significantly from the supplies sent to Ukraine so far and gotten a great many bangs per buck in containing the Russian forces (not least their navy). Maybe those Republican congresspeople usually so keen to guzzle from the pork barrel need to reminded of that on a daily basis.
As some of the action on the inland fronts has stalled, it's understandable that journalists are having to hunt out eye-catching angles on aspects of the conflict while they wait for something more spectacular to happen. It's now humdrum for Ukraine to intercept very high percentages of the missiles and drones targeting its population centres, in contrast to last year.
Apparently repeated Ukrainian strikes over the past few weeks on key installations in Crimea aren't clickworthy enough when so many are fixated on which side has gained a few hundred yards here or there every few weeks. Those Crimean strikes, more of them that will undoubtedly come in future, and the earlier attacks on Russian air defences that facilitated them are likely to prove much more significant in the long run.
= new reply since forum marked as read
