I'm really struggling

[JMCKUSICK]

With how we have a hard time being objective about this hearing.

We are not determining whether the filing by Romans attorney was bullshit.
It was. What matters here is only their responses to a hearing properly scheduled by a judge. Their obligation as both attorneys and private citizens was and is to be truthful in their filings and testimony.
If it is determined that either was not, it will detroy the entire case . Period , the end.
Emotions have no place in the arena of the courts. Just the facts.....
Think Michael Cohen, Michael Avenatti, etc....
Most everything they have contributed to the public discourse may be 100% true but as their ability to do anything, even under oath, was destroyed the moment their crediblity was forever compromised.
All the rest is window dressing at this point.

[sprinkleeninow]

1. Now on MSNBC: Spec. Prosecutor questioned by atty. of fake elector David Shafer

I'm trying really extremely hard to see lights at the end of all these tunnels.

People being grilled for possible minor infractions while egregious criminal acts are falling by the wayside.

I have my Faith which is not in 'this' world, but even so, I'm still here being affected daily by injustices and travesties which are wrecking society and life all over the globe.

[Beausoleil]

2. We are talking about people who have made careers

out of gaming the system.

It's what they do. They know about the structural weaknesses of our system and how to exploit them.

[50 Shades Of Blue]

3. No matter what happens, Willis' poor judgment casts a pall over the case at best.

There's really no coming back from that

[sprinkleeninow]

4. So very disappointing altogether if the outcome affects the progress the dept. made so far. nt

[Ms. Toad]

6. Her poor judgement has nothing to do with the case

The only connection I see is that she is alleged to have lied to the court. That is inexcusable, but still unrelated to the case against Trump.

[50 Shades Of Blue]

7. Tell it to Republicans.

[Ms. Toad]

8. I don't think Republicans rule this particular court. n/ t

[Irish_Dem]

12. She was naive, she didn't understand she is up against ruthless sociopaths.

Who will use anything to destroy her.

[Think. Again.]

5. What has compromised their credibility?

[JMCKUSICK]

9. If they lied or lie under Oath in their filings or testimony

[Think. Again.]

10. if.

[JMCKUSICK]

11. Very much correct, IF

[MadameButterfly]

13. I keep hearing implications that she did lie

and I assume there must be evidence to back this. Does such evidence exist and is it just the word of some Maga or has it been proven? Or is that what this hearing has yet to determine?