Why is Trump's bail not being revoked?

[Mr.WeRP]

He committed crimes against the people of Springfield, Ohio.

[gab13by13]

1. People fear him.

[Mr.WeRP]

2. Not the people of Springfield.

[Think. Again.]

3. That's a very good question.

[kwolf68]

4. Not sure

I'd guess he's the wrong socio-economic class and wrong race.

[onecaliberal]

5. I'd bet the house on your guess.

[republianmushroom]

19. And the farm.

[SCantiGOP]

6. Or it could be

That this country doesn’t put Presidential candidates in jail weeks before the election.

[Mr.WeRP]

11. If he killed someone, no prosecution then?

[SCantiGOP]

17. Absurd question

The discussion was about revoking bail
on an unrelated charge because of comments made in a political campaign.
There will be ample time to hold
accountable after the election.

[Mr.WeRP]

18. It's only reflecting the absurdity of your response

[onenote]

7. Because he hasn't been charged with any crimes. Because due process.

[Mr.WeRP]

10. Only probable cause of a crime is reaquired

If Smith brought this to Chutkin, she would only need probable cause to revoke bond.

[onenote]

12. Maybe the reason he hasn't brought it Chutkan is that he doesn't think there is probable cause

Proving Trump incited the threats against Haitians in Springfield probably is a non-starter First Amendment-wise.

[Mr.WeRP]

13. This is BOND violation... Smith doesn't have to prove anything. I mean, we all saw what happened

And there is no denying Trump made shit up about Springfield, and either negligently or maliciously, didn’t care about the repercussions which we all knew were coming.

Invasion of Nazis in Springfield,
Bomb Threats closing schools and government buildings,
Disruption of the peace of the people in Springfield
Encouraging hate against a race of people in a specific location

We only need probably cause to put him behind bars pending trial, at this moment.

[onenote]

15. He has to convince the court there is probable cause. He almost certainly doesn't think there is.

The first three things you cites are indeed crimes. But Trump did not commit them himself nor did he "incite" them as that legal term is applied consistent with first amendment.

There's a reason that the January 6 indictment doesn't charge Trump with "incitement" -- in fact the word incite or incitement never appears in the indictment.

As for "encouraging hate against a race of people in a specific location" -- not a federal crime. https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/learn-about-hate-crimes

[Mr.WeRP]

16. He need not prove, convince or otherwise...

The judge need simply “find” that there is probable cause. For a self-proclaimed attorney, you seem to like using words that mean the same thing as legal terms and use them instead when losing an argument.

[dlk]

8. When you're mobbed up...

Everyone gives you a wide berth.

[Shipwack]

9. Because he's a very special boy... nt

[jalan48]

14. He's too big to jail.