General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOn that "no tax on overtime" bait
Out of conversation with my other associates with a different position on this election outcome, "No taxes on overtime will be a great thing!"
I chose not to further the conversation, to the surprise of some.
When will they realize that the tax that they are not paying is part of the Social Security tax contribution. But then again it will further the notion that Social Security is going broke.
I know that my retirement plan is based on not only 401K but the estimate is based along with Social Security.
badhair77
(5,084 posts)He hired others to complete the job. No scruples.
calguy
(6,071 posts)Project 2025 has a provision that calls for the elimination of the 40 hour work week, and changing to the 160 hour work month, so that overtime is only paid after putting 160 hours in a month. That means that employers can require employees work 50 hours one week, and cut their hours the next week to 30, thereby never having to pay overtime again.
LizBeth
(11,222 posts)Response to RickHworth (Original post)
Midnight Writer This message was self-deleted by its author.
Vinca
(53,392 posts)If a waitress makes whatever the minimum hourly wage is (usually pretty sad) but then brings in $500 a week or more in tips, her SS payment will be based on just the peanuts base pay. They might be looking at not qualifying for $1,000 or more a month if it was based on wages and tips. It probably doesn't mean much to a young person who'd rather have the extra money now, but someday they may regret it.
jmowreader
(52,918 posts)Many employers have very strict anti-overtime policies. When I worked retail wed be written up for going over hours without good reason
if you were, say, stuck on shift mixing a massive paint order for a customer and went over that day, you had to leave early the next day.
What good is no tax on overtime hours if you get punished for accumulating overtime hours?
Igel
(37,399 posts)"No tax on overtime." Was he talking federal income tax? Payroll taxes?
Did he mean to imply a federal tax reimbursement for any local or state income taxes on it?
What about unemployment tax?
Who knows? He doesn't, so talking about what he means when he hasn't said what he means is unconstrainted fantasy.
When it gets to Congress--if it gets to Congress--then there'll be discussionable details. Until then ...