Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:18 PM Dec 2012

What happens if we go over the "cliff"?

Do people expect that if we go over the cliff, the Republicans will magically agree to extend unemployment benefits, invest in infrastructure, cut taxes for the 98% w/o cutting it for the 2%, pass the doc fix, patch the AMT, and raise the debt ceiling for 2 years without any cuts in Medicare/SS/social spending?

How will going over the cliff take away the GOP's leverage in the debt ceiling fight?

I don't understand what the argument is for going over the cliff. How would that make us any better off in terms of negotiating? How would going over the cliff guarantee that entitlement programs are protected?

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What happens if we go over the "cliff"? (Original Post) democrattotheend Dec 2012 OP
congress will pass an extension of tax cuts to lowest groups while highers will expire nt msongs Dec 2012 #1
What about unemployment & AMT Patch? And what about debt ceiling? democrattotheend Dec 2012 #2
We're not getting that any way RomneyLies Dec 2012 #10
Um, yeah we are democrattotheend Dec 2012 #15
And see how simple that is? Autumn Dec 2012 #3
I'll tell you. Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #4
But don't we still have to deal with the debt ceiling? democrattotheend Dec 2012 #7
They'll hold that hostage regardless RomneyLies Dec 2012 #11
It's looking like we will democrattotheend Dec 2012 #14
Then he'll have a hard time with that in two years because he'll have a much more GOP Congress RomneyLies Dec 2012 #16
I'm just reporting what I've heard. As for the debt ceiling... Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #21
Ignore it and let them try to Impeach. TheKentuckian Dec 2012 #27
The GOP has made its name as the 'party of tax cuts' 0rganism Dec 2012 #5
Gotcha. But what about the debt ceiling? democrattotheend Dec 2012 #8
They are going to hold the debt ceiling hostage regardless. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #12
Not if they raise it as part of a deal with the president now democrattotheend Dec 2012 #13
Then they win huge in 2014 because people will be unable to trust the Dems ever again. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #17
Doubt it democrattotheend Dec 2012 #18
I'll never vote again. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #20
That's you democrattotheend Dec 2012 #23
Hope and dream all you like RomneyLies Dec 2012 #24
not just him (her?) -- lots of folks will notice this one 0rganism Dec 2012 #25
Dropping out is what they want. You have to stay on the map. TheKentuckian Dec 2012 #28
We get everything we want the first week of the new congress. reformist2 Dec 2012 #6
Including debt ceiling, unemployment, AMT patch, doc fix, infrastructure? democrattotheend Dec 2012 #19
The Congress will pass new tax cuts for everyone, including the wealthy... kentuck Dec 2012 #9
Well, that's not the plan. nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #22
It wouldn't make the immediate situation better, but caving in on social security and medicare would still_one Dec 2012 #26

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
2. What about unemployment & AMT Patch? And what about debt ceiling?
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:23 PM
Dec 2012

Let's just say we go over the cliff, and then Congress comes back and passes the tax cut for the 98%. Don't the Republicans then still have the leverage to demand spending cuts in mid-February when the debt ceiling has to be raised?

Please, don't respond by saying that the 14th Amendment makes the debt ceiling unconstitutional. The White House looked into that route and decided it was too risky.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
15. Um, yeah we are
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:41 PM
Dec 2012

The president is not signing any deal (other than maybe a straight cut on middle class taxes) w/o at least a year, probably 2 extension on the debt ceiling. That much is clear.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
4. I'll tell you.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:25 PM
Dec 2012

It's because the new Congress coming in at the start of the year will have MORE Democrats, and Reid is working on changing the fillibuster rules in the Senate. It will be easier to get Democratic bills passed.

After the tax cuts - all of them - expire (which raises the rates on everyone, even the very wealthy), the Democrats will introduce bill(s) to lower the tax rates for the middle class. It's not definite they will be able to get that passed, but some think it's likely. Maybe even some Republicans will have a hard time explaining to their constituents why they voted against giving middle class citizens a small tax cut.

If all turns out well, the country gets tax rates hiked on the wealthy, and the rest of the citizens keep the tax rates they have now.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
7. But don't we still have to deal with the debt ceiling?
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:26 PM
Dec 2012

Let's just say things go the way you say. Won't the GOP still be able to demand spending cuts in exchange for raising the debt ceiling?

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
14. It's looking like we will
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:39 PM
Dec 2012

It's become pretty clear that the president is not going to agree to any deal now that does not extend the debt ceiling fight for at least a year, hopefully 2.

 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
16. Then he'll have a hard time with that in two years because he'll have a much more GOP Congress
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:42 PM
Dec 2012

after major losses in 2014 in the House and complete loss of control of the Senate since he'll have given away the only reason lots of people vote Dem.

2014 will be the biggest mid term bloodbath for a sitting president in history if he caves.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
21. I'm just reporting what I've heard. As for the debt ceiling...
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:58 PM
Dec 2012

what I've heard about that is that the Republicans got the main blame for the debt ceiling fiasco last year, which caused America's credit rating to go down, so it's not likely the Republicans will hold that hostage.

It's not an ideal plan. But it's a plan.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
27. Ignore it and let them try to Impeach.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 03:09 AM
Dec 2012

It wouldn't have come to this if we hadn't let them take more and more hostages working foolish deals that have built on each other to bring us to the present cross.

Hell, before that accepting their idiotic framing and running with it was flirting with the event horizon.

Each time the Tinkerbelle fans said to clap harder and bragged on the greatness of the deal.
The one leading directly to this "cliff" was the Great, Great Granddaddy of a milkshake drinking now many of the same voices are feinting in aisles at the prospect. What the fuck? C'mon, y'all are full of shit.

0rganism

(23,957 posts)
5. The GOP has made its name as the 'party of tax cuts'
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:25 PM
Dec 2012

"Going over the cliff", as it were, allows Democrats to yank that political carpet right out from under them.

Once we're "over the cliff", President Obama and the Senate Democrats can propose measures that cut taxes on 98% of income while restoring some of the social programs attacked by sequestration. Then if the Republicans refuse to go along, the Democrats can beat them like a rug with their refusals in the next election. They don't want this to happen, so they'd have incentive to cut a deal.

Correspondingly, it's also in their best interest to try to reach a deal before sequestration happens: they have a bigger house majority, more leverage in the Senate than they might in the next congress, and they don't risk looking like tax raisers.

It's always been in our interest for Obama to drive a hard bargain now to get a better one later.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
8. Gotcha. But what about the debt ceiling?
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:28 PM
Dec 2012

It seems like that is part of what the president is driving a hard bargain for, and rightfully so, because otherwise even if we get all of that in the next Congress can't they still demand "earned benefit" cuts in exchange for raising the debt ceiling?

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
13. Not if they raise it as part of a deal with the president now
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:38 PM
Dec 2012

Which is why I think President Obama is willing to play ball with them.

 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
17. Then they win huge in 2014 because people will be unable to trust the Dems ever again.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:43 PM
Dec 2012

You'll have the biggest mid term losses for the party of a sitting president in history over this deal.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
18. Doubt it
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:49 PM
Dec 2012

The chained CPI is complicated and the big cuts don't kick in until way down the line. I doubt most people will have noticed by 2014.

Hopefully by the time they do Congress will start patching it to prevent it from going into effect like they do with Sustainable Growth Rate in Medicare (the doc fix).

 

RomneyLies

(3,333 posts)
20. I'll never vote again.
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:53 PM
Dec 2012

No reason to ever vote again.

And I know dozens of people who only vote for Dems to protect these programs AND THEY ARE PAYING ATTENTION.

The debacle will be worse than 2010.

All because Dems like you are chickenshit to hold the GOP to the deal they already cut.

Republicans will be able to TRUTHFULLY run on "Democrats cut your social Security", and that will be damned attractive to people of my age.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
23. That's you
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 11:06 PM
Dec 2012

Most people don't follow the day to day of this. They won't notice the cuts until they get bigger, and by that point they won't remember how they got there. Plus, I am hoping if they pass this it will be like the doc fix, where they patch it every year once the cuts get steeper to prevent them from actually happening.

0rganism

(23,957 posts)
25. not just him (her?) -- lots of folks will notice this one
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 01:52 AM
Dec 2012

They may not be "following the day to day", but they'll sure as shit notice that when the buying power of their SocSec check drops through the floor. If the Dems let this happen, they'd better have a damn good plan for changing it back within a year or all hell will break loose.

"Hope" won't cut it on this, we need a near-certainty.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
28. Dropping out is what they want. You have to stay on the map.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 03:23 AM
Dec 2012

Better to write in Mickey Mouse in spot than go into the uncounted majority, a narrowing electorate allows cover for the shenanigans.

They are fine with not voting, what sets off foaming at the mouth is any pressure of any sort outside the duopoly.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
19. Including debt ceiling, unemployment, AMT patch, doc fix, infrastructure?
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:52 PM
Dec 2012

What makes you so sure of that?

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
9. The Congress will pass new tax cuts for everyone, including the wealthy...
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 10:31 PM
Dec 2012

with the stipulation that they be made permanent. We will be in the same situation as we are today, except the Treasury will have more money coming into it to pay for the social programs that will be needed to pay for the Republicans' dereliction.

They will continue the negotiation, just as they are today. The stock market will have a small drop at first but will recover when they see that the world is not going to end. People will finally wake up and call their congressmen when they see that they are paying more in taxes.

Both sides will blame the other.

still_one

(92,219 posts)
26. It wouldn't make the immediate situation better, but caving in on social security and medicare would
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:51 AM
Dec 2012

be worse

If we go over the cliff, at least a few days ago the republicans would have been blamed. Now, with Obama talking about cutting COLA and other things, he is making himself part of the problem

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What happens if we go ove...