General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTennessee Considers Training And Arming Schoolteachers To Protect Against Shootings
Tennessee has emerged this week as a center of the the answer is more guns in schools sentiment following the Newtown, Conn. elementary school shooting.
A member of the Republican-controlled legislature plans during its upcoming session to introduce a bill that would allow the state to pay for secretly armed teachers in classrooms so, the sponsor told TPM, potential shooters dont know who has a gun and who doesnt.
Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam (R) has said the idea will be part of his discussions about how to prevent a shooting like the one in Newtown from happening in the Volunteer State.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/12/tennessee-armed-teachers.php
Wait I thought teachers were lazy and overpaid. Now they want them to be trained and armed Rambo's
spanone
(135,844 posts)it's a shithole politically
gollygee
(22,336 posts)or to hand out tylenol
But we'll trust that they'll safely store their deadly weapons in their classrooms near our kids where our kids won't get them, and that they'll know how to handle them in a crisis.
But even with all that new responsibility, we'll still call them union thugs and we'll still think they're underpaid.
MadHound
(34,179 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)would believe that the answer to gun violence is more guns......
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)This would only benefit the lawyers who bring about civil suits when the certified staff screw up.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)the city. As normal, the Blue decision makes the most sense.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)1) Teachers are there to teach, not be paramilitary swat team.
2) Teachers are busy enough with their teaching. Where will they make time for training and practice?
3) Even professionals have accidents. I witnessed a cop shoot a hole in the floor of a private club when he was unloading his gun. It's logical to assume accidents would happen with greater frequency with teachers.
4) Suppose a teacher is attempting to subdue an unruly kid, and they grab the teacher's gun?
5)Assuming this program is voluntary, would parents have the choice of armed or unarmed teacher? Suppose no parents wanted the armed teachers?
6) How and where are the teachers expected to secure their guns when not teaching? Many have kids at home, not safe for guns there. So if all the guns are kept at the school, isn't that a tempting target for burglers?
I'm sure there's many more...
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)And another thing to consider, you are the armed teacher and you hear shooting. Do you run towards the gunfire or protect your own students? Ethical questions that no one is thinking about.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)Fuck, this country gets more stupid by the minute.
DollarBillHines
(1,922 posts)Fucking idiots.
I can just picture a surprised, adrenalized 20-something-year-old going for a locked cabinet and getting it on with someone with a plan.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Teachers are not going to want to go for this. It's completely stupid political grandstanding.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)I got a recent email from my son's school explaining what they do to protect students. I will use it to talk to my representative about this. He is a douche, but I'll make sure my voice is heard.
I want teachers in our schools. Not armed guards.