Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The chained CPI is really just a stealth 10% cut in SS benefits. It is a lie, and it is wrong. (Original Post) reformist2 Dec 2012 OP
it's more than a 10% cut, it's continuing cuts from scheduled benefits that get larger with HiPointDem Dec 2012 #1
Democrats badgolfer Dec 2012 #2
Stop being a naive, radical leftist... vi5 Dec 2012 #3
The impetus to "fixing" the inflation rate began after SS was reformed to have a trust fund. Selatius Dec 2012 #4
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
1. it's more than a 10% cut, it's continuing cuts from scheduled benefits that get larger with
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:13 AM
Dec 2012

each passing year. so the older you get, the less purchasing power you have.

what a great set-up for privatizing social security. "it's failing! we have to do something!!"

badgolfer

(244 posts)
2. Democrats
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:16 AM
Dec 2012

They all indicated hands off social security when running for office during this last election. If they want to be thumped big time in 2014, just continue down this path.

The Democrats had better stand by their words.

Pelosi seems to be changing with the wind after she was against changes to these programs.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
3. Stop being a naive, radical leftist...
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:22 AM
Dec 2012

You obviously don't know how government and negotiations work. I mean really what was Obama supposed to do. Also too, something about unemployment.

Selatius

(20,441 posts)
4. The impetus to "fixing" the inflation rate began after SS was reformed to have a trust fund.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:35 AM
Dec 2012

Prior to the reform, Social Security worked on a pay-as-you-go system. Taxes collected through payroll would be used to cover current retirees. If projections showed that pay-outs were going to be higher than revenue, then Congress would step in from time to time and adjust the rates.

The Greenspan commission came up with the idea of a trust fund made up of non-marketable securities that excess revenue could be placed. The revenue would be exchanged for the securities, and the revenue itself would then go into the General Fund.

The problem is that now Congress and the White House (regardless of who sits in the White House and who runs Congress) have a systemic incentive to try to curb pay-outs to retirees because of the excess revenue going into the General Fund, and the best way to curb the pay-outs is to change the way inflation is recorded.

Another incentive to under-reporting inflation is that if the inflation rate were lowered, each year the tax brackets, being under-adjusted for rising inflation, would act like a phantom tax increase without an official tax rate hike.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The chained CPI is really...