General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWow! Boehner just did a hit and run now, didn't he?
Looks like he's going to try to hammer Grover Norquist's Plan B through tomorrow and try to hang the President with the label of "tax raiser". Did you see that "press conference?"
unblock
(52,253 posts)plan b from outer space will go nowhere even if it does pass the house.
spanone
(135,844 posts)Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)If he manages to get his plan B passed before the fiscal cliff, Obama won't have the leverage of letting the tax cuts expire and reinstate a tax cut for 250k and below.
unblock
(52,253 posts)this is why i think we're going off the cliff.
both sides are posturing.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Boehner is blustering, nothing more.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)It's an amendment to a bill already passed by the House, then amended by the Senate and sent back to the House.
Procedurally, Reid has no choice but to bring it up for a vote.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)When the House Rules Committee gave formal notice of a meeting to set up floor debate for test votes on two proposals to extend some expiring tax rates, the panels advisory noted the measures would be offered as substitute amendments to a carefully selected but wholly unrelated bill.
The shell of a joint resolution that began as a routine annual extension of import restrictions on Myanmar will become the legislative vehicle selected for the plan B by Boehner, R-Ohio. The measure (H J Res 66) has already passed through both the House and Senate in different forms, which may give it obscure procedural advantages that could cut down on the time needed to approve a final fiscal cliff deal.
For the GOP, the measure that Boehner on Tuesday termed his plan B should talks with the White House break down also is part of a voting track the speaker is using to counter objections from House conservatives that it asks them in effect to vote for a tax increase. Boehners office emphasized Monday the speakers favored amendment does not raise taxes. It is a net tax cut that prevents a $4.6 trillion tax hike on Jan. 1. That rhetorical point is built in part on the current law that has taxes jumping at the start of the New Year.
pscot
(21,024 posts)we have a precedent for that.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)Boehner used Senate rules to his advantage on this one.
shraby
(21,946 posts)passed. If the house votes on their version, they just need reconciled and the bill is good to go.
Unless the house one is drastically different.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)Nothing changes. It's dead in the senate
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)It's bullshit. And for once, we shouldn't fall for it!
SugarShack
(1,635 posts)people who earn like 989K??? Really? Boehner is nuts. The wars have come due. How unpatriotic of those repubs.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Little Star
(17,055 posts)blueclown
(1,869 posts)But not in the Senate.
spanone
(135,844 posts)harry reid isn't going to bring it up for a vote...it's bullshit posturing
Johonny
(20,851 posts)I can't tell if he's trying to pressure Obama to back it so he will have enough house Dems to pass it or he is going to somehow twist enough Republicans arms? Which is something a lot of people doubt. If he needs the Dems then he needs to use the Dems 400,000 K number at least... fake drama so exciting
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)That was just his way of saying "I have no control over these nutty Teabaggers, and they scare me!"
Get your parachutes out. It looks like we're cliff diving.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)lpbk2713
(42,759 posts)Their damned obstructionism has brought us close enough to the brink as it is.
They would rather ruin the country than do anything that might be perceived as
going along with the Dems or more specifically Obama.
DearAbby
(12,461 posts)really, was anyone surprised? The man has no cajones.