Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:06 PM Dec 2012

Just remember: "GUN SAFETY LAWS" ...not 'gun regulation,' not 'BAN on (whatever)'..GUN SAFETY laws.

Last edited Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:44 PM - Edit history (1)

If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, I'm sorry to say it's time for us to flatter Frank "F-ck You Frank" Luntz. But we have to take control of the language while we still can.

We are not pushing for GUN REGULATION laws

We're pushing for COMMON SENSE, GUN SAFETY LAWS.


Edit: PS-The NRA is going to hold a press conference on Friday, and we can already guess what they're going to say.

WE HAVE TO EXPOSE THEIR LIE BEFORE they get a chance to say it!

They're going to suggest pressuring gun manufacturers for a VOLUNTARY ban on assault weapons and clips
(so that the big, bad, tyrannical old Gubmint doesn't have to get involved). The gun makers will agree to the ban, and then lift it a year from now after the heat is off them.

DON'T LET THIS TRICK EVEN GET OFF THE GROUND. Start talking about it now, and exposing it for what it is so that it will have no traction. We must make that lie a NON-STARTER.

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just remember: "GUN SAFETY LAWS" ...not 'gun regulation,' not 'BAN on (whatever)'..GUN SAFETY laws. (Original Post) TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 OP
Delicate little wusses, aren't they? tblue Dec 2012 #1
We're never going to convince THOSE people that blue-helmeted U.N. troops aren't coming for their TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #4
i want semi and automatic weapons BANNED and all weapons REGULATED. spanone Dec 2012 #2
So do I. But politics is the art of the possible. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #5
You are absolutely right! arthritisR_US Dec 2012 #3
Rhetoric to add bongbong Dec 2012 #6
Hah! Yeah, that would do it. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #9
Bet you're right! bongbong Dec 2012 #14
very true, language matters quinnox Dec 2012 #7
Indeed. This was a point made 2naSalit Dec 2012 #8
That's where I got the idea, and I noticed that Ed was already using the new language. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #11
Here ya go... 2naSalit Dec 2012 #25
Winning the message war... Blue Idaho Dec 2012 #10
Question. LP2K12 Dec 2012 #12
Handguns popularized by the movie Dirty Harry... Blue Idaho Dec 2012 #15
Makes sense... LP2K12 Dec 2012 #19
Here, we'll let Dirty Harry himself answer that. TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #16
Yep, as Chris Mathiews said, the 2nd Amendment crowd rise and sleep with the idea that the TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #13
The Gun Nuts are a minority... Blue Idaho Dec 2012 #17
Damned right, and crackpots like Louis Gohmert need to be shoved front and center as examples of TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #20
I am a teacher. Blue Idaho Dec 2012 #23
Hah! Good point! Some Democrat should introduce a bill allowing weapons into the House TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #24
And they will get shot first, Gohmert you ignorant hack. Hoyt Dec 2012 #26
Now we are down to pistols too? Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #27
Jonathan Alter was great last night on Tweety's show. He maintained that we should change the Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #18
"enforce the laws already on the books" "allow citizens to defend themselves from armed criminals" Warren DeMontague Dec 2012 #21
Well, of course the irony is that ordinary citizens already CAN defend themselves from armed TrollBuster9090 Dec 2012 #22
'Gun safety' is an oxymoron that I resist using. The only safe gun is a melted down former gun Dems to Win Dec 2012 #28

tblue

(16,350 posts)
1. Delicate little wusses, aren't they?
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:15 PM
Dec 2012

I take your point. We have to pussyfoot around the dead bodies so these trigger-happy misanthropes don't get their dander up. I get it. Pisses me off though. Hate those people.

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
4. We're never going to convince THOSE people that blue-helmeted U.N. troops aren't coming for their
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:26 PM
Dec 2012

their GUNZ!
We're competing for the hearts and minds of the majority of moderate, rational people. Perhaps one third of whom can be swayed by the language of "government REGULATION" rather than "safety." I, for one, am not going to give the conservative propagandists one inch of territory in the ideology spectrum. This is (literally) war. A war between the sane and the insane, and there are about 30 000 'casualties' in that war ever year.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
6. Rhetoric to add
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:27 PM
Dec 2012

To get really in-their-face, how about naming any prospective law the:

"Common Sense Child Safety and Pro-Life Act"

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
9. Hah! Yeah, that would do it.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:40 PM
Dec 2012

The NRA is going to give a press conference on Friday. I can already guess what they're going to 'propose.'


They're going to propose pressuring gun manufacturers to have a 'VOLUNTARY BAN' on assault weapons, to avoid having the big, bad, ham-fisted, tyrannical GUBMINT do it. We have to expose this lie before they get a chance to use it.

The gun companies will just agree, and then rescind the voluntary ban a year from now when the spotlight is off again.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
7. very true, language matters
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:31 PM
Dec 2012

and The "Gun Safety" 2013 Act, is an easy sell compared to the other terms.

2naSalit

(86,647 posts)
8. Indeed. This was a point made
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:31 PM
Dec 2012

by one of the guests on the Ed Show last night. We can't let them have control over the message language. If we take that wedge tool away from them, we will maintain the upper hand on this. In political parlance, words are used as tools in the framing and that's what we have to keep control of here. It chumps/trumps the NRA screechfest before it gets a leg-hold on the TeeVee and elsewhere. It will help give those who don't agree with the upper echelon a way to take a closer look and add their views to the argument for sanity.

Thanks for reiterating that point!

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
11. That's where I got the idea, and I noticed that Ed was already using the new language.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:49 PM
Dec 2012

The rest of us have to follow the lead if it's going to go anywhere.

Do you have a link to that clip from the Ed Show, by the way? I don't, but it would be nice to have.

THANKS!

2naSalit

(86,647 posts)
25. Here ya go...
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 01:46 AM
Dec 2012

Whew, I couldn't remember which segment it was so I had to watch a few of them. That specific part of the conversation is about half way through it but all of the conversation covers lot of ground on the issue and who's saying what.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755822/ns/msnbc-the_ed_show/#50231895

Blue Idaho

(5,049 posts)
10. Winning the message war...
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:45 PM
Dec 2012

How we say what we say is important. This is not about convincing liberals and progressives, it's about reaching independents without closing their minds. Thanks to the NRA the phrase "gun control" carries a lot of baggage - it suggests nameless faceless officials walking in your house and taking away your guns. Its time to change the message. Who can argue with "common sense gun safety?" It sounds much more like a group effort to protect everyone in a community from needless gun violence.

If we can get past the Pavlovian response to buzz phrases created by the NRA, we may all agree that ninety round clips, military style assault weapons, sawed off (tactical) shotguns, and "Dirty Harry" handguns do not belong in the hands of civilians.

LP2K12

(885 posts)
19. Makes sense...
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:58 PM
Dec 2012

Go figure that would go over my head. I'm a gun owner, but I've never been into that mindset.

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
16. Here, we'll let Dirty Harry himself answer that.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:55 PM
Dec 2012

And also explain why Gun Nuts invited him to the GOP Convention.




TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
13. Yep, as Chris Mathiews said, the 2nd Amendment crowd rise and sleep with the idea that the
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:52 PM
Dec 2012

government is trying to take away their guns. They're one issue voters. Meanwhile, the rest of us have other things to worry and think about, and the gun issue only comes into our minds when there is a senseless slaughter of the innocent. If we're ever going to do anything about it, it has to be now.

We're never going to convince the gun nuts that there needs to be greater regulation, but at least we can stop the gun nuts from having the advantage on language propaganda, which they've enjoyed for decades.

Blue Idaho

(5,049 posts)
17. The Gun Nuts are a minority...
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:56 PM
Dec 2012

We need convince ordinary Americans just how unsafe the gun crowd is making our streets.

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
20. Damned right, and crackpots like Louis Gohmert need to be shoved front and center as examples of
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:01 PM
Dec 2012

these idiots, suggesting that the solution to crackpots coming in to schools and mowing down children is to start arming all the teachers.


Blue Idaho

(5,049 posts)
23. I am a teacher.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:47 PM
Dec 2012

I have taught for thirty years now. All my training, all my class work, all the seminars I have attended and given and not one ever delt with shooting a classroom assassin armed with an assault rifle loaded with a ninety round clip.

In my professional opinion as an educator, more weapons equals more bullets, equals more death and carnage. If these dumbshits really like this idea, let them pass legislation that lets people bring their weapons into the House, the Senate, and every courtroom in America.

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
24. Hah! Good point! Some Democrat should introduce a bill allowing weapons into the House
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 06:51 PM
Dec 2012

of Representatives, and see who dares to vote for it. Get rid of the metal detectors at the door of the Capital Building, and just rely on House Representatives bringing their own guns into the House as a way of deterring gun violence against them. See how far that gets.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
18. Jonathan Alter was great last night on Tweety's show. He maintained that we should change the
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:56 PM
Dec 2012

language. "Gun safety laws" is much better than "gun control" or "regulation".

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)
22. Well, of course the irony is that ordinary citizens already CAN defend themselves from armed
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:11 PM
Dec 2012

criminals. Citizens with no criminal record or history of mental illness can get guns that are more than adequate for self defense. The problem is that all the loopholes in the current gun laws (third party sellers) make it easier for criminals to GET guns. That's what we have to start pointing out.

The gun manufacturer's lobby doesn't want anybody to realize this, because it's a RACKET.
1. Make it easy for criminals to get guns through third party sellers.
2. Scare the public about how many criminals have guns.
3. The public buys more guns.
4. Go to step 1...repeat ad nauseam.

How ironic is it that the paranoid nutcases were accusing Obama and Eric Holder of making it easy for Mexican drug gangs to get guns (through the 'fast and frivolous' faux scandal) as an excuse to tighten gun laws. When in fact, THE OPPOSITE scam is currently running, big time. The Gun Lobby makes it easy for CRIMINALS to get guns, scaring the general public into buying even MORE guns, and around and around we go. Until there are now more guns in America than people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just remember: "GUN ...