Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal Court Says Newspaper Has the Right to Fire Journalists -- Under the First Amendment
AlterNet / By Laura Gottesdiener
Federal Court Says Newspaper Has the Right to Fire Journalists -- Under the First Amendment
"The First Amendment affords a publisher - not a reporter - absolute authority to shape a newspaper's content," Judge writes.
December 19, 2012 |
Tuesday in California, the Federal Appeals Court ruled against a group of journalists at the Santa Barbara News-Press who had been fired for demanding editorial integrity and a union. Rather than uphold their rights both to unionize and to speak out against bad editorial practices, the federal court instead said their dismissals were protected by the publisher's First Amendment Rights to print whatever she wanted.
The dispute began in 2006, when nearly all the top journalists and editors at the Santa Barbara News-Press quit because the paper's owner and publisher Wendy McCaw was interfering in the editorial content. As Melinda Burns, one former journalist at the paper wrote in the Santa Barbara Independent about that period:
"Spring had barely turned to summer that year when Editor Jerry Roberts and four other editors resigned, citing what they said was McCaws unethical interference in newsgathering and reporting. A dozen reporters quit, too, including one who had been covering a neighborhood dispute over the development plans of Rob Lowe, an actor friend of McCaws who wanted to build a mansion on a vacant lot in Montecito. Following standard newsroom practice, the reporter reported the address of the lot. Lowes assistant called the paper to complain, saying Lowe was going to cancel his subscription. McCaw fired off harsh letters of reprimand to the reporter and three editors, who all eventually resigned. Those of us who chose to stay in the newsroom knew we needed a written contract to protect our job security and integrity as journalists from McCaws arbitrary attacks."
So, as Burns writes, the remaining journalists reached out to the Teamsters and joined the union. When McCaw refused to recognize their affiliation with the Teamsters, the newsroom held a union vote and won. Soon after, McCaw fired eight journalists (including Burns). ..................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/corporate-accountability-and-workplace/federal-court-says-newspaper-has-right-fire-journalists-under
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 751 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Court Says Newspaper Has the Right to Fire Journalists -- Under the First Amendment (Original Post)
marmar
Dec 2012
OP
"Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one." ~ A.J. Liebling. . .
Journeyman
Dec 2012
#1
This needs to be struck down. At least 1/3 of news is based on bloggers in some way.
slampoet
Dec 2012
#3
Journeyman
(15,036 posts)1. "Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one." ~ A.J. Liebling. . .
A. J. Liebling, in "Do you belong in journalism?", The New Yorker (14 May 1960)
bongbong
(5,436 posts)2. Just like Fox "news"
They won that court decision in 2003 allowing them to label, and broadcast, known lies as "news".
slampoet
(5,032 posts)3. This needs to be struck down. At least 1/3 of news is based on bloggers in some way.
even a lot of the stuff you read on the AP started in blogs.
To not uphold their 1st amendment rights are individuals threatens any news that isn't just xeroxing press releases.