General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNY-GOV: Mamdani declines to immediately back Hochul's reelection after she offers him coveted endorsement
After Gov. Hochul finally endorsed him for mayor over the weekend, Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani declined to immediately return the favor Monday by backing her own reelection bid.
My focus is on November, Mamdani, a democratic socialist, told reporters when asked if he would endorse Hochul for a second term ahead of her 2026 reelection battle. And Im excited to have the governors support in that fight for November as we make it clear that that we can put the days of City Hall and Albany being at war in the past.
Mamdanis dodge came a day after Hochul, a moderate Democrat, formally endorsed him Sunday after declining to do so for weeks. Hochuls endorsement put pressure on other top New York Democrats to back Mamdani, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who have so far declined to offer support for the mayoral front-runner.
The move by Mamdani to withhold immediate support comes as Hochul could face multiple intense political battles next year.
https://www.nydailynews.com/2025/09/15/mamdani-declines-to-immediately-back-hochuls-reelection-after-she-offers-him-coveted-endorsement/
Nixie
(17,944 posts)after I heard of her endorsement. Now I know.
stopdiggin
(15,070 posts)In truth - I don't think this really means too much, or count for much of anything ...
But it's all just so gosh darned amusing, and .... Rich?
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,393 posts)More clickbait nonsense by the ny daily news

lapucelle
(20,950 posts)

lapucelle
(20,950 posts)And unlike the NYT, NYDN still has a city desk.
Are you confusing it with the Murdoch rag the New York Post? Both newspapers do have "New York" in their names, and that can be tricky for some people.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,393 posts)
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)Oh, OK.
But the references are all so ... in the past ... old.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,393 posts)
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)There's nothing wrong with focusing on those two. Lots of people like pop stars.
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)they would probably choose this.

Nixie
(17,944 posts)How many emojis does that get??
I noticed the news of his billionaire wedding at his parents compound was not posted about much here, probably because most ordinary people dont get 3-day weddings at their parents compound. There was masked security, good times.
Did you read that article about Taylor Swift? Will her wedding be as lavish? Three-day celebrity weddings seem to be normal now. One day for the meet and greets, one day for the ceremony, and the third day for the after parties. That takes a lot of money, though.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,393 posts)The NY Daily News is classified as a tabloid. Tabloids do clickbait (how this thread started). They may be our tabloid but its still a tabloid.
Nixie
(17,944 posts)some are so hung up on them.
You were trying to pretend that a wedding announcement was too trivial for the erudite crowds you must hang with. Yet, wedding clickbait is all over the news, including Mamdanis very extravagant wedding, complete with lots of media pictures. It looked like a fabulous 3-day wedding. Congrats to the newlyweds.
This thread also didnt start the way you described, but thats as usual. Its actually an interesting juxtaposition of the value of endorsements and whats required of the endorsement recipients.
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabloid
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,393 posts)tabloid
adjective
1
: of, relating to, or resembling tabloids
especially : featuring stories of violence, crime, or scandal presented in a sensational manner
Even your Wikipedia source has this:
a type of journalism deriving from the style used by newspapers in tabloid format, focusing on controversial and sensationalistic angles or subjects
Maybe google AI can help you:
Is new york daily news a tabloid?
Yes, the New York Daily News is a tabloid. This is accurate in two different ways: by its physical size and by its journalistic style.
Physical size
The Daily News is printed in the smaller, more compact tabloid format, which is easier to read on the go, such as on the subway.
In contrast, a broadsheet, like The New York Times, is larger and unfolds vertically.
Journalistic style
As America's first successful tabloid when it was founded in 1919, the Daily News attracted readers with sensationalized coverage of crime and scandal, along with a focus on photographs and entertainment.
While it has evolved and won Pulitzer Prizes for serious journalism, it retains its more accessible, fast-paced style and often competes with other New York papers, such as the New York Post, for eye-catching headlines.
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)You used the word "tabloid" as a noun, and then skipped right over its definition as a noun and instead posted the definition of "tabloid" as an adjective. That's what the "adj" means. Your post used the word as a noun.
Here's the definition of "tabloid" as both a noun and an adjective from your source:
noun
1: a newspaper that is about half the page size of an ordinary newspaper and that contains news in condensed form and much photographic matter
2: digest, summary
tabloid
adjective
1 of, relating to, or resembling tabloids especially : featuring stories of violence, crime, or scandal presented in a sensational manner
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tabloid
==============================
Using AI can be so tricky! Your *source* says that the NYDN attracted customers 106 years ago (that's even older than the facebook meme) with sensationalized stories about crime and scandals, but it has evolved won Pulitzer prizes for serious journalism.
==============================
And finally, The decontextualized snippet from Wiki appears to be describing a type of journalism rather than a newspaper format, and the result of the cropped, partial quote is "a tabloid is a type of journalism..."
Is your Wikipedia mid-sentence snippet from the section about a specific subset of tabloids, the red top tabloid? The NYDN is not a red top tabloid.
See also: Red tops
Red top tabloids, named after their distinguishing red mastheads, employ a form of writing known as tabloid journalism; this style emphasizes features such as sensational crime stories, astrology, gossip columns about the personal lives of celebrities and sports stars, and junk food news. Celebrity gossip columns which appear in red top tabloids and focus on their sexual practices, misuse of narcotics, and the private aspects of their lives often border on, and sometimes cross the line of defamation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabloid
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)LeftInTX
(34,015 posts)It was berating Jeffries and Schumer because they hadn't endorsed Mamdani.
The thread was quite strident.
I really don't care if Mamdani endorses Hochul and I don't care if Schumer and Jeffries don't endorse Mamdani. I think Mamdani doesn't need their endorsement. Hochul may need Mamdani's more than he needs Schumer and Jeffries'.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,393 posts)Mamdani has already been through the primary and running against NON DEMOCRATIC candidates - namely a sex-pest Trump aligned spoiler, a criminal trump aligned hostage, and a certified loon Republican who karate chops old ladies on the subway since 1980
Mamdani is the verified certified DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE.
Vote blue no mater who!
LeftInTX
(34,015 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(27,393 posts)Which was actually the point of my initial comment.
The NY Daily News is a couple notches above Bat Boy inc. with their front pages.
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)Gerald R. Ford and Marie Antoinette did not have much in common, but being misquoted cost both of them their jobs.
snip==================================
Mr. Ford, on Oct. 29, 1975, gave a speech denying federal assistance to spare New York from bankruptcy. The front page of The Daily News the next day read: FORD TO CITY: DROP DEAD.
Mr. Ford never explicitly said drop dead.Yet those two words, arguably the essence of his remarks as encapsulated in the immortal headline, would, as he later acknowledged, cost him the presidency the following year, after Jimmy Carter, nominated by the Democrats in New York, narrowly carried the state.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/28/nyregion/28veto.html

jaymac
(259 posts)Just because he hasn't endorsed does not mean he won't..........is this like a game of slap jack where you have to respond as fast as you can? jeez, take a breath.
SocialDemocrat61
(6,905 posts)is political incest. No one really cares.
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)and he declined to endorse the Democratic nominee for president.
I'm not sure why anybody is surprised by this latest turn. It was to be expected.
JI7
(93,264 posts)and even those outside of NYC more interested in attacking Democrats. They aren't liberals.
JustAnotherGen
(37,618 posts)So far he isn't being hung around Sherrill's neck in NJ. I don't want the DSA fucking it up for NJ. This election is a nail biter. We could pick up 2 Assembly and Senate seats - and that's what we need to change the state constitution to allow for mid decade re-districting.
Shittarelli would not allow it - Mikie will.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Maru Kitteh This message was self-deleted by its author.
mcar
(45,712 posts)Looking forward to hearing the criticisms of a Democrat not endorsing a Democrat.
UniqueUserName
(397 posts)He isn't required to put his thumb on the scale of the Democratic primary.
You will have a point if he fails to endorse the Democratic nominee once the primary is over.
MichMan
(16,693 posts)Quiet Em
(2,561 posts)October of this year would be a great time for anyone to endorse Mamdani for this year's NYC Mayoral election and October of 26 would be a good time for folks to endorse Governor Hochul.
betsuni
(28,763 posts)JI7
(93,264 posts)She is running statewide so will need votes outside of NYC.
Nanjeanne
(6,513 posts)high a profile as a current Governor. I am quite sure Mamdani will endorse Hochel if she wins the primary. And Im sure he will endorse any Democrat who wins the Democratic nomination for Governor.
Not Picking sides in a Democratic primary makes sense to me. And the Daily News is simply trying to stir something up which also makes sense for the Daily News. Sad to see Democrats expecting Mamdani to choose one Dem over another when its possible Delgado could win and be the candidate. And others could enter the race still.
Incanus
(180 posts)J/k, please do keep it up, a voice of reason is much appreciated.
Emile
(40,786 posts)tritsofme
(19,812 posts)Emile
(40,786 posts)lapucelle
(20,950 posts)Emile
(40,786 posts)lapucelle
(20,950 posts)And you know what? He was a politician in 2024. He was running for his third term.
Oh, please indeed.

Can you name the NY Assembly members who endorsed Kamala Harris?
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)when he didn't endorse the Democratic nominee for president?
Did he endorse Biden-Harris in 2020 when he was running for State Assembly or did he follow the DSA resolution prohibiting the endorsement of the Democratic nominees?
Nanjeanne
(6,513 posts)It doesn't inform my opinion what happened in in 2020 when he was running for State Assembly. This is 2025 and I am absolutely positive that the Democratic Candidate for Mayor will endorse the Democratic Candidate for Governor.
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)There is no guarantee that a Democrat will win the 2026 gubernatorial race. We've had Republican governors in NYS, and the Democratic nominee will most likely be facing a formidable Republican challenger.
Hardly any of Mamdani's proposals can be enacted without action from the governor and the NYS legislature.
Mamdanis plans for universal child care, fare-free transit, and affordable housing rely on Albany getting on board.
Two of the three key planks in his platform making buses free to ride and providing universal free child care would require action from the governor and state legislature, including raising taxes by billions of dollars. (The third, freezing the rent on rent-stabilized apartments, can be accomplished at the city level.)
https://nysfocus.com/2025/06/26/zohran-mamdani-albany-taxes
====================================
Mamdani has proposed increasing taxes on wealthy city residents to fund programs like free bus service and universal childcare.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has previously called additional tax increases a "nonstarter," citing concerns that higher taxes could drive wealthy residents out of the state.
As demonstrated during former Mayor Bill de Blasio's term, a New York City mayor's ambitions are often constrained by the state government, particularly regarding tax policy.
https://bit.ly/4nBvIlt
Nanjeanne
(6,513 posts)JustAnotherGen
(37,618 posts)I don't see him doing it. Some people are only Democrats when it's away into office.
Same time - it would hurt the Democratic nominee in Buff, Roc, and Cause to have his endorsement.
JI7
(93,264 posts)others endorse him.
My bigger problem is with the hypocrites who try to say the NYC mayor's race which the Republican has no chance of winning is more important than the Presidential race.
JustAnotherGen
(37,618 posts)That's just nonsense. Sliwa was just to run somebody. He's not a contender.
SSJVegeta
(2,388 posts)Midwestern Democrat
(1,029 posts)after his general election victory was virtually inevitable - I'd be like, "She can wait a little bit".
lapucelle
(20,950 posts)to enact most of his agenda without Albany's help. Political tit-for-tat is extremely ill-advised.
No New Yorker wants a situation where one politician says, "She made me wait. Now I'm gong to make her wait", lest that becomes Albany's response for the first year of the new mayor's term.
Besides, it will be impossible for Mamdani to enact most of his agenda without Kathy Hochul's help. The mayor cannot raise corporate and income taxes on his own, so Hochul's pragmatism might be something to emulate.
What's ironic is that Zohran Mamdani actually currently the has power to help advance the agenda he is now promoting as a mayoral candidate. He ran for NYS Assembly on the same agenda in 2020.
New Yorkers are still waiting.
karynnj
(60,811 posts)Assume Mamdani becomes mayor and the relationship between Albany and NYC improves. Not hard given Adams is now mayor.
Then an endorsement from the new mayor speaking of any examples would be more powerful than an endorsement from a mayoral candidate.
Also, an endorsement now would look like they traded endorsements. Making both endorsements mean less.
Hekate
(100,132 posts)
jump on the glorious Mamdani bandwagon? Especially the Dem politicians who werent even New Yorkers?
Because it sure looks like Mamdani is going to take his own sweet time about returning the favor of an endorsement when it suits him.
Or did I read this wrong?
