General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLawrence O'Donnell has made a promise to his viewers
Last edited Wed Sep 17, 2025, 02:27 PM - Edit history (1)
A couple of nights ago, Lawrence vowed that he was not going to cover what trump wants him to cover. Trump wants the media to cover the Kirk murder and to blame Democrats. So he barely covered it that night except to point out that Democrats were not to blame and that Rs are responsible for more violence than Democrats. Then on to Epstein and other stories.
Last night he covered the self-dealing story that was featured in the NYT, about how the Trump family is enriching themselves with the help of the UAE. It was (is) a huge story that was largely ignored on other cable shows. Really mind blowing, and well documented. It is the story that prompted trump's ridiculous lawsuit. Lawrence interviewed the reporter.
Lawrence knows that you cannot let trump determine what should be the story of the day. Unfortunately, most of the WH press corps is more than willing to do so. But the stories that he doesn't want covered are the real stories that make a difference in the lives of the American people.
malaise
(293,117 posts)Rec
senseandsensibility
(24,262 posts)is that he does original shows. It's much easier to just follow along with whatever narrative is being told on all the cable shows. But he does original reporting, makes his own decisions about what's newsworthy, and criticizes his peers when it is necessary. All of these things take more effort and courage than what most others do.
malaise
(293,117 posts)of experience
CBHagman
(17,435 posts)Those traits distinguish his coverage from so much that is out there.
malaise
(293,117 posts)Rec
3catwoman3
(28,658 posts)that drips with contempt.
senseandsensibility
(24,262 posts)(those two excel at it) to his rant persona.
benfranklin1776
(6,991 posts)Others need to emulate his good example. 👏🏼👏🏼
OLDMDDEM
(3,040 posts)young_at_heart
(4,002 posts)I remember the first time I saw him (same with Rachel) and I immediately noticed a difference. Everything about his delivery was exceptional and I have to say......that has not changed. I only wish the MAGATs would watch (and really listen) him! Unfortunately, they wouldn't listen with an open mind.
Moostache
(11,009 posts)Just sayin'... one set of priorities are geopolitical and massively important and the other are culture-warrior horse shit and manure that used to be the sole province of The National Enquirer level outlets. I half expect the media to run a 30th anniversary of the "BatBoy" cover and spend a few weeks ignoring everything else.
senseandsensibility
(24,262 posts)It definitely deserves much more attention. But IMO the media doesn't want to cover it because it reflects poorly on trump.
zorbasd
(514 posts)calguy
(6,071 posts)a very low percentage of Americans actually watch his show.
senseandsensibility
(24,262 posts)Still, I do what I can to promote him and I hope others do too. You can watch his show online, so he reaches more people that way.
ancianita
(42,973 posts)because four nights a week he got the damn word out about what tariffs really are and how stupid this prez and his henchmen are AND think their base are.
Now they've been getting blowback. And there's nothing good trump does to offset that new DISTRUST of his mental and political competence and leadership.
May 2024, reporter Brian Stelter noted that O'Donnell's program was among the top 10 highest-rated cable news shows, with viewership around 1.6 million viewers per night.
In March 2024, Nielsen data cited by Adweek showed The Last Word as MSNBC's most-watched show in terms of total viewers, with 1.65 million viewers.
In June 2025, an uptick in ratings for O'Donnell's show was attributed to the feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. On one Thursday, the program drew nearly 1.5 million viewers.
Sure, he's got time slot competition. The Last Word at 10 p.m. ET consistently beats CNN in total viewership but typically faces tough competition from Fox News' Gutfeld!.
Demographics: O'Donnell's audience is strongest among older viewers (Baby Boomers) and men. But so what. Boomers VOTE.
In April 2025, his program was one of only two MSNBC shows to appear in the month's top 15 cable news programs for total viewers
Do not shortchange the best thinker on cable news. Americans are paying attention and spreading his knowledge.
RussBLib
(10,437 posts)JI7
(93,264 posts)we can help increase that.
ancianita
(42,973 posts)calguy
(6,071 posts)but as a percentage of the population, not that many tune into cable news.
ancianita
(42,973 posts)erronis
(22,747 posts)It's become a convent of the consort press. And if one reporter strays, they and their owners are ex-communicated -- perhaps until several million$ are exchanged.
senseandsensibility
(24,262 posts)I'm afraid. They should have done so in the beginning when the AP was banned. But they have rolled over at every opportunity.
calimary
(89,129 posts)And the more I think about it, the more I like it. Its rapidly turning from like into LOVE.
erronis
(22,747 posts)Thanks!
(Just as some background, I have some real historical experience with the WH press corps.)
H2O Man
(78,695 posts)Lawrence is the best.
bluestarone
(21,287 posts)BHDem53
(1,118 posts)ancianita
(42,973 posts)while waiting for Lawrence.
But I'm still sure to give MSNBC my nightly viewership time.
proud patriot
(102,416 posts)He calms me like Dan Rather used to .
dobleremolque
(1,100 posts)someone does not want printed. Everything else is public relations."
George Orwell
senseandsensibility
(24,262 posts)That is exactly right.
ancianita
(42,973 posts)senseandsensibility
(24,262 posts)Quanto Magnus
(1,303 posts)for Keith Olbermann so many years ago, I was skeptical. He has really done a great job!!
Hassler
(4,778 posts)Quit MS Whatever it is over the firing of Dowd for his accurate critique about violent speech leading to violence. But then, neither did Maddow or Hayes. "Liberal" MS was the first network to fold to censorship. They are all rich, how much money do they need to do the right thing?
badhair77
(5,084 posts)If they quit who will take their places? Perhaps it is best to keep them with a voice on other causes we care about?
Do you think the network would hire other firebrands?
ancianita
(42,973 posts)MSNBC isn't losing in the federal courts for LYING.
Considering today's state of media bias, don't make the perfect the enemy of the good.
BComplex
(9,776 posts)MSNBC right wing management screwed everything up so badly.
quakerboy
(14,731 posts)Its here too. Epstein is all but wiped from the front pages so we can discuss the distraction of the day.
Its very discouraging to see it work here. lets get back on topic.
LetMyPeopleVote
(175,358 posts).
yellow dahlia
(4,698 posts)He brings honesty and stern reality, and delivers it with intelligent eloquence.
SunSeeker
(57,629 posts)yellow dahlia
(4,698 posts)as warranted by the times..
Bengus81
(9,845 posts)MSNBC would never fire him or the whole crew would walk along with I would say most ALL of their viewers. Corporate at MSNBC knows that more than anyone.
Upthevibe
(10,047 posts)dlk
(13,122 posts)There wouldnt be quite as many filed.
The goal is as much for political grandstanding in the press, and to bankrupt defendants, for spite, as it is for any legitimate legal purpose.