Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCongressional Black Caucus says resolution honoring Charlie Kirk 'not about healing'
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus condemned a bipartisan resolution to memorialize conservative organizer Charlie Kirk on Friday, saying the measure validated Kirks beliefs, and legitimized racist, harmful, and fundamentally un-American ideals.
In a statement following the Houses approval of the resolution, which received support from more than 90 Democrats, the caucus denounced political violence and the killing of Kirk, but said individuals must condemn violence without abandoning our right to speak out against ideas that are inconsistent with our values as Americans.
The resolution introduced in the House to honor Charlie Kirks legacy is not about healing, lowering the temperature of our political discourse, or even ensuring the safety of members of Congress, staff, and Capitol personnel, they wrote. It is, unfortunately, an attempt to legitimize Kirks worldview a worldview that includes ideas many Americans find racist, harmful, and fundamentally un-American.
The caucus outlined some of Kirks past comments that they said they strongly disagreed with, listing his belief that the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended racial segregation, was a mistake; his denial that systemic racism exists; his promotion of the Great Replacement theory; and his offensive claims about Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Michelle Obama, and Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee lacking adequate cognitive ability.
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/09/19/congress/congressional-black-caucus-charlie-kirk-resolution-00573160
In a statement following the Houses approval of the resolution, which received support from more than 90 Democrats, the caucus denounced political violence and the killing of Kirk, but said individuals must condemn violence without abandoning our right to speak out against ideas that are inconsistent with our values as Americans.
The resolution introduced in the House to honor Charlie Kirks legacy is not about healing, lowering the temperature of our political discourse, or even ensuring the safety of members of Congress, staff, and Capitol personnel, they wrote. It is, unfortunately, an attempt to legitimize Kirks worldview a worldview that includes ideas many Americans find racist, harmful, and fundamentally un-American.
The caucus outlined some of Kirks past comments that they said they strongly disagreed with, listing his belief that the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended racial segregation, was a mistake; his denial that systemic racism exists; his promotion of the Great Replacement theory; and his offensive claims about Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Michelle Obama, and Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee lacking adequate cognitive ability.
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/09/19/congress/congressional-black-caucus-charlie-kirk-resolution-00573160
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congressional Black Caucus says resolution honoring Charlie Kirk 'not about healing' (Original Post)
demmiblue
Sep 2025
OP
US House Congressional Black Caucus members who voted for it anyway: Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY-8), Gregory Meeks (D-NY-5),
Celerity
Sep 2025
#2
lostincalifornia
(4,932 posts)1. no kidding
Celerity
(53,787 posts)2. US House Congressional Black Caucus members who voted for it anyway: Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY-8), Gregory Meeks (D-NY-5),
David Scott (D-GA-13)
Don Davis (D-NC-1)
fujiyamasan
(1,256 posts)8. Thanks for pointing out, it's pretty pathetic
UTUSN
(77,074 posts)3. Adding, from videos I've seen of KIRK: He was not "relatable" either, his "debating" was just browbeating, and
he was just another Fundie/MAGAt, wholly literal "scripture" based, not on scholarship of the development of religion(s) (cf., tons of YouTubes of scholars). He did not invent family, marriage, children - not unique to him. What was remarkable specifically to him was his joining the long list of victims of gun crimes and that he was another human like everybody.
Solly Mack
(96,436 posts)4. ...
Cirsium
(3,421 posts)5. Racist, harmful, and fundamentally un-American
Quiet Em
(2,565 posts)6. It wasn't about healing at all.
I will never forget how Republicans behaved on this day.
fujiyamasan
(1,256 posts)7. I'm with the CBC
The fact that all or most Dems couldnt stand in solidarity with them (or Pelosi for that matter) is appalling and shameful.
It wont gain them a single vote, but I wouldnt be surprised if it causes even more bleeding from the base.
Just pathetic.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
(1,906 posts)9. Charlie Kirk was just a klansman in a suit.
electric_blue68
(26,054 posts)10. You can Condemn Political Violence W/O Honoring a Racist and Sexist!!