Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tblue37

(68,216 posts)
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:16 AM Sep 2025

Mike Johnson refuses to swear in a Democrat who won her election in a landslide just so he can block a vote on the

Epstein files:

Mike Johnson refuses to swear in a Democrat who won her election in a landslide just so he can block a vote on the Epstein files. bsky.app/profile/acyn...

Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) 2025-09-26T23:53:34.818Z
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mike Johnson refuses to swear in a Democrat who won her election in a landslide just so he can block a vote on the (Original Post) tblue37 Sep 2025 OP
Crooked Mike running interference to hide the oasis Sep 2025 #1
Mike Johnson is running interference for ReRe Sep 2025 #12
A good friend of mine... Dulcinea Sep 2025 #65
Is Mike Johnson in the Epstein files? Sounds like it. flvegan Sep 2025 #2
He's too sanctimonious to ... you know what. usonian Sep 2025 #4
Just like Shakespeare said: They protesteth too much! n/t ReRe Sep 2025 #13
Look at how many preachers and priests abuse children, I can speak from experience because I was a victim Maraya1969 Sep 2025 #23
A sanctimonious persin is one who makes a show of being morally superior to others. ShazzieB Sep 2025 #56
Not sure about that Kali Sep 2025 #58
Nope, that was indeed him Bettie Sep 2025 #67
didn't Matt Gaetz do the same? Kali Sep 2025 #68
Yep... Bettie Sep 2025 #69
That's what I was going to say. ShazzieB Sep 2025 #70
Paedophile is probably the wrong name; sexual abuser is probably better. And I bet Maraya1969 Sep 2025 #66
You think I'm a man? 🤣 ShazzieB Sep 2025 #71
I don't think he's in the files Retrograde Sep 2025 #10
I concur. ShazzieB Sep 2025 #50
I see no reason he would want to protect "pedophiles," plural. ShazzieB Sep 2025 #52
If there is no other option NJCher Sep 2025 #3
What a partisan hack Norbert Sep 2025 #5
One of 147 congressional J6 Insurrectionists B.See Sep 2025 #48
The McConnell Doctrine: BurnDoubt Sep 2025 #6
Wilhoit's law. usonian Sep 2025 #8
Yep. Thank you. BurnDoubt Sep 2025 #24
I bet he's in it Maraya1969 Sep 2025 #7
See reply #4 usonian Sep 2025 #11
Nope Katcat Sep 2025 #37
I think a feder judge can do it, too. RandySF Sep 2025 #9
Li'l Pervy is a piece of work Hekate Sep 2025 #14
So, once Grijalva is sworn in, the public will get to see teh Epstein files?!? AZJonnie Sep 2025 #15
Republicans are protection child rapists Champp Sep 2025 #16
Same trick McCONnell pulled with Garland and Barrett. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2025 #17
Exactly shanti Sep 2025 #51
This is BS D_Master81 Sep 2025 #18
Pretty obvious who Johnson sees as his true lord and savior. Paladin Sep 2025 #19
I'd suggest taking it to the courts, but we've now got a chapter of the Trump fan club operating within them. Vinca Sep 2025 #20
It's a small consolation indeed, but it's there DFW Sep 2025 #21
This is true, but their sheeples won't know about this erronis Sep 2025 #38
Ominous foreshadowing for midterms 2026 Arazi Sep 2025 #22
Only if the cowardly Republicans let him newdeal2 Sep 2025 #33
Mike Johnson is likely a pedophile Johonny Sep 2025 #25
My beliefs are based on fact. Gimpyknee Sep 2025 #47
They seem terrified to release the Epstein Files. Wonder why? surfered Sep 2025 #26
So when will we learn not to broadcast our strategy? Raven123 Sep 2025 #27
So is Rebl2 Sep 2025 #28
If it were any other USSC, then a Writ of Mandamus on the shadow docket no_hypocrisy Sep 2025 #29
I knew that POS would try this. Can we get a rapture for these sociopathic hypocrites, please? Midnight Writer Sep 2025 #30
Hoping they got the story wrong and Dark n Stormy Knight Sep 2025 #35
I don't care where they go as long as it isn't here. Midnight Writer Sep 2025 #36
If Moses Mikey refuses to do his effing job, MLWR Sep 2025 #31
Republicans are corrupt. Six117 Sep 2025 #32
Ask yourself " What would republicans do" then do that. Have Rep show up and say Speaker waived swearing in. Pepsidog Sep 2025 #34
you know, more and more I'm starting to believe that Madison Cawthorn was telling the truth about his colleagues dingosatemyusername Sep 2025 #39
That's like having the winning Super Bowl team not get the trophy because... Beartracks Sep 2025 #40
Jan 6, 2029 should be interesting...... Montauk6 Sep 2025 #41
What a total fucking piece of shit! Initech Sep 2025 #42
Straight out of the Mitch McConnell playbook. Katinfl Sep 2025 #43
lickspittle lackey protecting predators. Sounds Christ-like. Evolve Dammit Sep 2025 #44
Our way of governing has been destroyed. spanone Sep 2025 #45
If this isn't telling I dont know what is SamuelTheThird Sep 2025 #46
Egads, how many congressional republicans are Emile Sep 2025 #49
But the Felon is innocent. We aren't worried about his involvement with Buddyzbuddy Sep 2025 #53
Direct link to the post CousinIT Sep 2025 #54
calvinball. rules for me, not for you, or, CHEATING. pansypoo53219 Sep 2025 #55
We live in Tucson debsy Sep 2025 #57
Time for every Dem to leave? bluestarone Sep 2025 #59
A simple majority is required for quorum Jose Garcia Sep 2025 #60
TY was not sure. bluestarone Sep 2025 #61
Let him meet God GAJMac Sep 2025 #62
I saw this coming. soldierant Sep 2025 #63
Learned everything he could from Moscow Mitch? AllyCat Sep 2025 #64

oasis

(53,372 posts)
1. Crooked Mike running interference to hide the
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:25 AM
Sep 2025

misdeeds of his dear leader. Twisted little dweeb.

ReRe

(12,180 posts)
12. Mike Johnson is running interference for
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:09 AM
Sep 2025

current and former members of the Republican Party.
The House/The Senate. The Administration. The Judicial.

Dulcinea

(9,705 posts)
65. A good friend of mine...
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 10:31 PM
Sep 2025

...is from Louisiana & she's so embarrassed that this dork is from her home state.

flvegan

(65,824 posts)
2. Is Mike Johnson in the Epstein files? Sounds like it.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:26 AM
Sep 2025

Just asking questions, though. Why would he protect pedophiles otherwise?

usonian

(23,676 posts)
4. He's too sanctimonious to ... you know what.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:34 AM
Sep 2025

Some people are in there that I suspect are "supremely" important. Or just the orange Oompa Loompa.

He is a vile disgrace, covering for child molesters and their enablers, one of which he has become.

Their desperation says a damn lot.

Maraya1969

(23,421 posts)
23. Look at how many preachers and priests abuse children, I can speak from experience because I was a victim
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 07:52 AM
Sep 2025

of a pastor. So when you use the word "Sanctimonious" I think that is a symptom

ShazzieB

(22,238 posts)
56. A sanctimonious persin is one who makes a show of being morally superior to others.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 03:46 PM
Sep 2025

Synonyms include holier-than-thou and self-righteous. All of these words certainly apply to Johnson. I have zero respect for him, because he's a hypocrite and a spineless today. I'm not, however, aware of any evidence that he's a pedophile.

Leaving all the above aside, he is, very definitely, a Trump sycophant. He has repeatedly demonstrated his willingness to bend over backwards to do the Orange Hellbeast's bidding, and this situation is no different. Trump obviously doesn't want the Epstein files released, and I'm sure Mikey will have hell to pay if he fails to prevent it from happening. I'm sure he would be willing to go to great lengths to avoid that. He doesn't need any motivation other than that.

I am both bemused and amused at how quick so many people here are to assume he's a pedophile, that he's trying to "protect pedophiles," or even that he's been directly involved in Epstein's pedo/sex trafficking activities, AS IF his obvious desire to keep Trump happy isn't more than sufficient motivation for his actions.

Johnson is sanctimonious, but there are many ways to be sanctimonious, not all of which include pedophilia.

Kali

(56,661 posts)
58. Not sure about that
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 05:11 PM
Sep 2025

Didn't he "adopt" a young black man. Before he married his wife? Or is thar some other repuke hypocrite?

Bettie

(19,317 posts)
67. Nope, that was indeed him
Sun Sep 28, 2025, 08:08 AM
Sep 2025

and I'm certain that Epstein provided boys for some of his "friends".

I don't know whether Mikey was high enough on the food chain to partake in Epstein's offerings, but I do believe that he's a predator like most of them.

The more they prattle about god and their "personal relationship" and how much more moral they are than other people, the more likely they are to be doing shady things of all kinds. People who use religion as a bludgeon are not believers in anything but their self-perceived superiority.

Bettie

(19,317 posts)
69. Yep...
Sun Sep 28, 2025, 11:38 AM
Sep 2025

the best way to know what they are doing is to watch what they accuse others of.

ShazzieB

(22,238 posts)
70. That's what I was going to say.
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 01:42 PM
Sep 2025

I remember hearing about Gaetz a long time ago. Didn't know that about Johnson.

Maraya1969

(23,421 posts)
66. Paedophile is probably the wrong name; sexual abuser is probably better. And I bet
Sun Sep 28, 2025, 07:26 AM
Sep 2025

you are a man.

ShazzieB

(22,238 posts)
71. You think I'm a man? 🤣
Mon Sep 29, 2025, 02:38 PM
Sep 2025

That's hilarious. I'm a 75 year old cis afab woman, married to a cis amab man for over 51 years, mother of a 40 year old daughter. Of course I can't prove that to you, and I'm not going to try. I'm just stating the facts.

The idea that not being 100% convinced Johnson is a pedophile/sex abuser means I must not be a woman is quite a leap. My sentiments on this have nothing to do with either my biological sex or my gender identity. I'm just a stickler for not assuming things without some kind of actual evidence.

Suspicion and speculation are all well and good, and I have done my share of indulging in both. I draw the line, however, at promulgating rumors (of any kind) that aren't based on something more substantial than "All of those evil, slimy Republicans must be pedophiles just because they're evil, slimy Republicans." Some of them no doubt are sex abusers, but I'm not buying the idea that Johnson wanting to block the release of the Epstein is "proof" that he is one of them.

As I said in my previous comment, I think his desire to keep Schlump happy at all costs is all the motivation he needs to fight the release of those files tooth and nail, and I see no reason to jump to any additional conclusions. That is all.

Retrograde

(11,379 posts)
10. I don't think he's in the files
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:49 AM
Sep 2025

people he knows, or works with, or who fund GOP candidates - that's another story

ShazzieB

(22,238 posts)
50. I concur.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 03:01 PM
Sep 2025

Among other things, the timeline doesn't fit. Mikey was born on January 30, 1972. If his Wikipedia article is accurate, he seems to have spent his entire life in Louisiana prior to being seated in Congress in January 2016. It's hard to see how he would have ever crossed paths with Epstein, who was arrested for the last time on July 6, 2019.

I get wanting to suspect the worst of that sanctimonious stuffed shirt, but the idea of his ever having been associated with Epstein’s pedo/sex trafficking activities is extremely farfetched, imo.

ShazzieB

(22,238 posts)
52. I see no reason he would want to protect "pedophiles," plural.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 03:10 PM
Sep 2025

But I'm quite sure he wants to protect Trump. That is all the motivation he needs.

Also see my other reply in this thread, as to why it makes no sense to suspect him of being associated with Epstein's activities: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220678539#post50

NJCher

(42,542 posts)
3. If there is no other option
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:32 AM
Sep 2025

Snip
A writ of mandamus is a court order compelling a public official or lower court to perform a required ministerial duty when they have failed to do so, or to correct a clear error. This "extraordinary writ" is not used for discretionary acts but only when a party has a clear legal right to the action, there is no other adequate legal remedy, and the duty is mandatory under law. Filing a petition for mandamus, often to expedite an agency's decision-making or correct an erroneous judicial ruling, leads to a court review to determine if the writ should be granted.
AI overview
Snip

AI overview

I tried it once and it went through.



Norbert

(7,597 posts)
5. What a partisan hack
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:38 AM
Sep 2025

The voters spoke with an overwearing victory so he will not swear her in, silencing these voices. So sick of the GTP (Grand trump Party) and their impunity.

B.See

(7,860 posts)
48. One of 147 congressional J6 Insurrectionists
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:38 PM
Sep 2025

who should've been locked the fk up with the rest of them. So, no surprise there.

BurnDoubt

(1,515 posts)
6. The McConnell Doctrine:
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:21 AM
Sep 2025

"We do as we please.
Others must do as they're allowed."
(Paraphrased here From "Ripper Street&quot

usonian

(23,676 posts)
8. Wilhoit's law.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:47 AM
Sep 2025

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”


That line—written by Frank Wilhoit—has become a popular aphorism to sum up the hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of the modern Republican Party.

https://pylimitics.net/wilhoits-law/

usonian

(23,676 posts)
11. See reply #4
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:51 AM
Sep 2025

He wouldn't even (you know what with you know whom) unless Jesus gave him a written permission slip.


IN TRIPLICATE.

He's covering. He's an enabler.

Katcat

(547 posts)
37. Nope
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:32 PM
Sep 2025

I don’t think he’s a real Christian, he just plays one for the cameras and for money/power.

AZJonnie

(2,894 posts)
15. So, once Grijalva is sworn in, the public will get to see teh Epstein files?!?
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 04:07 AM
Sep 2025

Well then this is amazing news, because sooner or later he'll have to swear her in.

Then she just 'votes', and bam, they're out!?!

Sweet!

D_Master81

(2,344 posts)
18. This is BS
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 06:37 AM
Sep 2025

I’m sorry but if you win an election you should be immediately able to vote on bills and motions. I mean what’s to say if the Dems win back the house they will even allow them to be seated?

Paladin

(32,318 posts)
19. Pretty obvious who Johnson sees as his true lord and savior.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 06:53 AM
Sep 2025

And it ain't Jesus Christ.

Vinca

(53,390 posts)
20. I'd suggest taking it to the courts, but we've now got a chapter of the Trump fan club operating within them.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 06:54 AM
Sep 2025

DFW

(59,762 posts)
21. It's a small consolation indeed, but it's there
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 07:14 AM
Sep 2025

This is the Republicans' was of admitting that Democrats are the people's choice, but they will do everything they can to prevent that choice from determining who governs us. Republicans despise Thomas Jefferson, channeling John Locke in the Declaration of Independence, asserting that governments derive "their just powers from the consent of the governed."

If the "consent of the governed" can be extrapolated to mean majority rule, the Republicans lose power. They obviously don't want that. Ergo:whatever method, legal, illegal, or in-between, can be employed to prevent the will of the governed from being carried out--those methods are, in Republican minds, legitimate. It is Jefferson who is, in Republican minds, illegitimate. After all, what did Jefferson know? All he did is write that Declaration of Independence that they all pretend to cherish so much, they all carry a copy of it around with them. The Republicans are with us inasmuch as they consider the pursuit of happiness a legitimate goal. When it comes to life and liberty, that's where they differ from us. That's where it turns into "not interested" for them.

erronis

(22,747 posts)
38. This is true, but their sheeples won't know about this
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:37 PM
Sep 2025

and if stumble across some mention in the supermarket tabloid front pages will be told it's for the good of the country, flag, patriotism, nazionalism, and dear fuhrer.

Arazi

(8,725 posts)
22. Ominous foreshadowing for midterms 2026
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 07:52 AM
Sep 2025

Hope I’m wrong and Johnson allows an orderly transition but I fear this is only the beginning of blocking Dems from being sworn into their rightful positions.

newdeal2

(4,840 posts)
33. Only if the cowardly Republicans let him
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:45 PM
Sep 2025

It would only take a few on their side to topple his speakership.

Raven123

(7,578 posts)
27. So when will we learn not to broadcast our strategy?
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 09:48 AM
Sep 2025

Not saying Mikey wouldn’t have thought of it on his own, but why make it easy for them?

Rebl2

(17,436 posts)
28. So is
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 09:51 AM
Sep 2025

he just going to refuse to swear in all democrats that win in the future? She or the party should sue him if that’s even possible. That’s part of his job and it’s dereliction of duty not to swear her into office.

no_hypocrisy

(54,361 posts)
29. If it were any other USSC, then a Writ of Mandamus on the shadow docket
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 10:01 AM
Sep 2025

should resolve this.

A writ of mandamus is a court order compelling a public official or lower court to perform a required ministerial duty when they have failed to do so, or to correct a clear error. This "extraordinary writ" is not used for discretionary acts but only when a party has a clear legal right to the action, there is no other adequate legal remedy, and the duty is mandatory under law. Filing a petition for mandamus, often to expedite an agency's decision-making or correct an erroneous judicial ruling, leads to a court review to determine if the writ should be granted.

But we're playing Stud Poker.

Midnight Writer

(25,156 posts)
30. I knew that POS would try this. Can we get a rapture for these sociopathic hypocrites, please?
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 11:31 AM
Sep 2025

MLWR

(790 posts)
31. If Moses Mikey refuses to do his effing job,
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:14 PM
Sep 2025

he should be replaced as Speaker. What he is doing is preventing the people who live in that AZ district from having legal representation. Maybe THEY need to sue him. They certainly have "standing."

Six117

(302 posts)
32. Republicans are corrupt.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:42 PM
Sep 2025

There's nothing to wonder about. Rules, "norms", laws
- none of that mean anything to them. For us, when the opportunity comes around -match that energy.
Take back our country.

Pepsidog

(6,353 posts)
34. Ask yourself " What would republicans do" then do that. Have Rep show up and say Speaker waived swearing in.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:47 PM
Sep 2025
39. you know, more and more I'm starting to believe that Madison Cawthorn was telling the truth about his colleagues
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:39 PM
Sep 2025

cocaine fuel orgies

Beartracks

(14,389 posts)
40. That's like having the winning Super Bowl team not get the trophy because...
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:45 PM
Sep 2025

... somebody blocks the scoreboard from being updated.

=============

Initech

(107,575 posts)
42. What a total fucking piece of shit!
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:50 PM
Sep 2025

It's all about keeping their asshole in power. This is more reason for him and his ass kissing goons to be removed!

Katinfl

(649 posts)
43. Straight out of the Mitch McConnell playbook.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:55 PM
Sep 2025

You know he is taking orders from trump. When will people wake up and see the light?????

spanone

(141,069 posts)
45. Our way of governing has been destroyed.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:15 PM
Sep 2025

These fuckers ignore all rules with no consequence.

Buddyzbuddy

(2,169 posts)
53. But the Felon is innocent. We aren't worried about his involvement with
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 03:10 PM
Sep 2025
EPSTEIN. He barely knew the man.

Hey smurf, do you think this is better or worse. If he were innocent, you have every opportunity to prove it. If he were just a traveling companion you can prove it.
He is the President in his final term. You must know or truly believe that your chosen one is a pedophile because otherwise, why would you run interference for him. In addition, you know your billionaire supporters are guilty of pedophelia. Aren't you concerned that a protector of those creeps might be suspected of similar behavior?

CousinIT

(12,290 posts)
54. Direct link to the post
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 03:13 PM
Sep 2025

Mike Johnson refuses to swear in a Democrat who won her election in a landslide just so he can block a vote on the Epstein files. bsky.app/profile/acyn...

Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) 2025-09-26T23:53:34.818Z

debsy

(775 posts)
57. We live in Tucson
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 04:43 PM
Sep 2025

We voted for Adelita Grijalva. We pay our federal taxes. Mike Johnson, swear in our representative so we can have our damn representation, you coward!

The only way republicans can win is by cheating.

soldierant

(9,290 posts)
63. I saw this coming.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 09:46 PM
Sep 2025

Of course he did. She would be the deciding vote on the discharge petition.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mike Johnson refuses to s...