General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI expect the shutdown to last through 11/15, then 47 caves.
Last edited Sun Oct 19, 2025, 06:16 PM - Edit history (1)
Opps. Posted this earlier and somehow self-deleted. Took a shot at recreating.
--------------------------
With 47's floor approval being breached, I think any Republican who won by less than 10%, or even 15%, is getting very, very nervous.
There are cracks. At least 8 members of the House have broken with Johnson on his indefensible recess. Soon it will be a dozen. Then the momentum against Johnson will pick up.
As 47's approval continues to slide, the resolve to thwart public opinion on the enhanced subsidies will crumble
And his approval will continue to slide.
Here's why think it will last through 11/15, and then end with a trump "deal" on subsides.
The harm of the shutdown is terrible to witness. But as it goes on, don't be surprised if Trump allows it to drag out at least through the first week of Nov.
The reason? Because he wants to suppress release of the Oct job numbers in early Nov.
Remember, the 150,000 or so Federal workers who took the "it's not a buyout" buyout were technically employed through 9/30, which means the bloodbath would be reflected in the report that would be released in early Nov if the government were open.
I expect Republicans/47 to cave, but they won't do it until mid-November. This is in line with Kalshi estimate of around 45 days on the betting market, and lines up with my logic of threading the needle between suppressing the horrific Oct job numbers, and having it resolved with "good news" before families get together for Thanksgiving.
617Blue
(2,188 posts)pat_k
(12,663 posts)... in the recent Raging Moderates with Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov
Basically, America has made an "all in" bet on AI. Incestuous, circular deals are artificially inflating the indexes. It could keep giving trump cover for a long time -- or could come crashing down.
Rough transcript of sections I found interesting:
29:38 And essentially, the reason the market is up 14% is that 75% plus of the market's gains come from 10 companies led by NVIDIA. And now Jensen is implementing a series of circular, kind of incestuous deals that feel very like a late stage 99 to me. If the market has been down 14%, I believe that Trump wouldn't have the cloud cover to go into Portland...
30:53 Jensen Huang (NVIDIA), Sam Altman (OpenAI), Satya Nadella (Microsoft), and the continued march of the magnificent 10 is the cloud cover for the administration...
34.11 Around AI, there's this notion of fragility and what makes a robust economy. And essentially, it comes back to diversification. So the fast-food industry is a robust industry. If McDonald's goes out of business -- the biggest player -- youre going to have no problem getting a lot of calories for a fairly low price.
34:28 The banking industry in the United States is not robust. If JP Morgan has some rogue trader in Singapore who figures out a way to bypass all compliance in their pursuit of returns, and Jamie Diamond calls Trump and says, "Oh gosh, you're not going to believe this. Some rogue 28-year-old has put us under and we need a bailout." They're too big to fail at this point. That means the U.S. banking sector is probably not that robust. Some people would argue that when Silicon Valley Bank went under the market was fine. It was resilient. I would argue that it's probably not that robust.
35:04 And what we have now is an economy that is looking increasingly fragile because you have 10 companies representing 40% of S&P by value. The S&P represents 50% of the total market value capitalization. I'm writing about it this week for my No Mercey, No Malice newsletter.
And I think this is how the end begins. And that is all these circular deals.
So, NVIDIA invests 100 billion in Open AI with the agreement they're going to take that 100 billion and invest it back in NVIDIA chips. 100 billion in incremental business to NVIDIA creates 55 billion in operating margin -- they have 55 points of operating margin, or 55 billion in earnings times a PE of 50. That's like a 1.4 trillion technical increase in notional valuation off of a hundred billion dollar investment.
AOL was pulling this sleight-of-hand back in the late 90s, investing in ecommerce companies in exchange for them spending all that money on AOL, such that they could continue to report growth that justified what was an exceptional artificially inflated valuation. This is late-stage 99 circular deals.
36.11 There's an amazing graph put together by Bloomberg showing that these deals have now become very popular. So, what happens here, the string or the rope that gets pulled is there's more research; there are more reports from big companies saying the adoption layer, if you will, is not taking off the way we thought. That is, companies that have signed up for AI made huge investments, but they're not seeing the ROI they had expected. So, if they announce a pullback in spending, NVIDIA gets cut in half -- and effectively, if you have the magnificent 10 cut in half. The magnificent 10 could get cut in half -- they still wouldn't look cheap, but that would be a 20% decline in the value of the S&P, and a 10% decline in the total market cap of all stocks globally. And that would disproportionally -- I don't want to say hurt, because they are pretty resilient -- but it would disproportionally affect the top 10% who are now responsible for 50% of consumer spending. Which again, see above, makes a fragile or anti-resilient economy.
37:14 And the thing about rich people is that when they make money, it's great because they can spend a lot more because of the effect of the stock market. But the downside is that wealthy people can take their spending down 20%, 30%, 40%. Middle class homes can't take their spending down that much because they are spending money on essentials.
37:32 But if the wealthy all feel less wealthy because they wake up and the market is down 20% and some of the tech is down 40%, they can take their spending down 30 or 40%, which would immediately take us into a recession, or a global recession.
37:48 So, I think that we have what is becoming an increasingly concentrated economy, and an increasingly fragile or anti-resilient economy again. And again, I come back to the statement that America has become a gigantic bet on AI and it's fueling the markets. It's fueling cloud cover from trump.
38:07 And I want to be clear. When guys like me are saying we are on the precipice of a bubble popping, that usually means the markets going to go up another 20 or 30% in the next two years. This is not financial advice, because this is a political show, but what I am actually doing with my own personal finances is I'm rotating out of U.S. and tech stocks into European and Latin American stock. So, you always want to be in the market. You want to be in low-cost funds. But America is the largest economy in the world right now. I think it is accurate to say it's a bet on AI and the sustained crazy, frothy market valuations. I definitely think we could see a significant draw-down here that would have global implications.
More about the entire podcast in this post. https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220733959
bucolic_frolic
(53,899 posts)pat_k
(12,663 posts)Whatever that "plan" may be, it is guaranteed to be consistent with every other horrific action designed to increase private insurance profits by emptying the pockets of the American public.
They already cut about 100 billion a year from Medicaid (if Democrats trade ACA subsidies for being accomplices on MAGA Murder Bill Medicaid cuts in the next budget) and added costs to administrate guaranteed-to-fail work requirements (although, kicking off millions more for technical failure to comply is a big win to R's)
They are hell bent on eliminating enhanced ACA subsidies, doubling (and worse) premiums for people who currently receive the tax credits)
They implemented rules that increase out-of-pocket costs for ACA and employer sponsored plans by nearly $1000 a year.
They changed rules to lower the actuarial value of marketplace plans. This means even greater increases in costs paid by the insured.
They plan to change Medicare Advantage with the aim of forcing people off classic Medicare and eliminating Medicare Supplement/Medgap plans. A bait-and-switch we must not fall for because the goal is to privatize and destroy Medicare.
They plan to create an ACA "short term insurance option" that screws people over.
Not to mention all the orders eliminating coverage for reproductive health and gender affirming care that are killing people.
The ONLY answer is universal health care.
Even if the regime formulated something they'll try to sell as universal healthcare, you can guarantee it is nothing but a grift that will be a boondoggle for cronies, and a massive shift in costs to every person with a human body that requires preventative care, and pharmaceutical/medical treatment and management for injury and disease.
The trump healthcare plan: Work harder, pay more, deny care, and kill people off.
It's the scrooge plan:
Hurry up and die and "decrease the surplus population "
usonian
(23,396 posts)He's gonna shit ten oil tankers' worth.
How this involves Putin is beyond me (thank goodness) but watch the bobbing and weaving. Putin must have copies of something for sale, the price skyrocketing (pun unintended) daily.
The dam has cracked open "royally".
More at 11,
2025
Is in the human trafficking business himself and he knows everything. 'gina-neck never thought he'd actually be exposed though the fear has always been there. Shit's getting real so he's freaking. His minions are, possibly figuring out that they don't share his immunity.
Someone will have to step in and remove him pretty soon. Someone who still respects the Constitution and is willing to uphold their oath. Probably half of all American adults have taken the oath at some time, it's not a time limited oath, when you take it, you take it for life.
At least that's how I observe it as someone who has administered and taken the oath many times.
pat_k
(12,663 posts)As Scott Galloway points out the Oct 15 Raging Moderates, every 71 to 74 hours, as soon as Epstein starts to creep back into the news cycle, the regime comes up with a series of ridiculous actions that will take the media's gaze off Epstein.
Discussion of Epstein as a driver of events around 28.20 and again a little later
usonian
(23,396 posts)The Randy Royal is the breaking point, IMO.
Nothing can stop the facts from coming out now because there isn't just one channel to block. This was a global operation.
No "turning point". A tipping point.
pat_k
(12,663 posts)I think giving Andrew the boot had more to do with the publication of Virginia Giuffre's posthumous memoir on Tuesday.
Yes, it will certainly put Epstein back in the spotlight, and perhaps that will stir up revelations about trump, but apparently she was a trump fan who has said she has no knowledge of his involvement.
usonian
(23,396 posts)Compare with "The Man Who Would be King" (Kipling)
It breaks the infallibility (protection) myth.
Not kings. Not princes. Not CEOs. Not judges. Just johns and pimps.
He's not going down alone.
fargone
(545 posts)...the widely publicized monthly job numbers.