Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(27,559 posts)
Fri Jan 2, 2026, 06:44 PM Jan 2026

Supreme Court advances 'kooky theory' devoid of 'constitutional grounding': legal expert

Written by Alex Henderson January 02, 2026 | 09:01AM ET

Within in the MAGA movement, a far-right legal doctrine known as the Unitary Executive Theory has become increasingly prominent. The theory claims that U.S. presidents have sole authority over the federal government's executive branch, and its critics argue that it ignores the checks and balances in the U.S. Constitution.

One of those critics is Simon Lazarus, who was a domestic policy adviser for President Jimmy Carter in the late 1970s but has spent most of his career working for Washington, D.C. law firms.

In an article published by The New Republic on January 2, Lazarus is highly critical of the Unitary Executive Theory and the U.S. Supreme Court — which, he argues, is helping to advance an idea that has no "grounding" in the U.S. Constitution.

https://www.alternet.org/unitary-executive-scotus/

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Baitball Blogger

(52,355 posts)
1. Yup. We know.
Fri Jan 2, 2026, 07:30 PM
Jan 2026

This kind of twisted thinking can be sifted out if only we could remove a judge from the bench for committing perjury during their Constitutional hearing.

turbinetree

(27,559 posts)
2. I can name 6 right off the top of my head...............everyone of them said that they would follow precedent and then
Fri Jan 2, 2026, 07:37 PM
Jan 2026

Last edited Fri Jan 2, 2026, 09:05 PM - Edit history (1)

after getting in and just throw it out the window............and what really classic two of them were accused of sexual malfeasance and they still get on the bench.........if I had lied on my AOA access application for the airlines that I worked for at the airport which is federal property I would have been hauled off to jail..........unfrickin believable.....................

modrepub

(4,114 posts)
3. Strong Executive Branch
Fri Jan 2, 2026, 08:00 PM
Jan 2026

Only when it's held by Republicans. Democratic Presidents, not so much.

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,906 posts)
4. I took Con Law a long time ago and they did not discuss the unitary executive theory
Fri Jan 2, 2026, 08:02 PM
Jan 2026

I have an early edition of Tribe on Con Law and will check if Tribe mentioned this theory

valleyrogue

(2,722 posts)
6. "Unitary executive" is just a fancy word for dictator.
Fri Jan 2, 2026, 08:32 PM
Jan 2026

The far right always has to put fancy words in place of factual words.

MLWR

(1,027 posts)
8. I can't think of one "decision" they've made, starting in 2000 (Bush v Gore) that had "constitutional grounding."
Fri Jan 2, 2026, 09:04 PM
Jan 2026

Roy Rolling

(7,635 posts)
9. Corporatespeak
Fri Jan 2, 2026, 09:12 PM
Jan 2026

It’s corporate jargon for a single owner business.

Ironically, corporations are formed to be the opposite of an individual, but be governed by a democratic board of directors,

Loki

(3,830 posts)
10. In other words,
Fri Jan 2, 2026, 09:36 PM
Jan 2026

A strong Executive Branch not answerable to any other equal branch is a king. We fought a war over that one.

mountain grammy

(29,038 posts)
11. The Roberts court stopped Biden from forgiving student loans
Fri Jan 2, 2026, 09:53 PM
Jan 2026

Based on a “major question doctrine” something that never existed. They’re making it up as they go along.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court advances 'k...