Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,026 posts)
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 09:38 PM Dec 2012

Only two-thirds of British children live with both parents

The analysis by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) showed that 68.9% of children live with both parents in the UK, well below the average of 84%. The lowest percentage was in Latvia at 64.9%, while the highest was in Finland where it stood at 95.2%.

The UK percentage is low in contrast with other western European countries, such as Germany (82%), Italy (92.1%), Spain (91.5%) and France (79.5%). In the 70.7% of children live with both parents.

full: http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2012/dec/29/two-thirds-british-children-live-parents

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Igel

(35,317 posts)
2. In the US, the average is about the same as in Britain.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 11:46 PM
Dec 2012

Average living with two parents is far higher for Asians, somewhat higher for whites, a bit lower than the British average for Latinos, and a bit more than half of the average for blacks.

Family structure is highly correlated with academic achievement. Less well correlated with income (many of those Latinos are fairly low on the SES ladder), with there being a causal connection relating family structure to an increase in the father's annual income.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
3. What are they saying, here?
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:06 AM
Dec 2012

Some kids live with their mother part time, and their father part time--is this a kid who lives with "both parents?"

It's not really clear--there's a mention of "traditional nuclear family" but they didn't specify.

I think parents who divorce should buy their kids a house, and if they share custody, the parents should move in/out and leave the children in situ. Much easier than forcing the poor kids to pack up and move every other weekend/summer/holiday.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
4. Mom, Dad, kids under the same roof all the time is "traditional"
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:09 AM
Dec 2012

divorced/separated/never-married..are the part time options

MADem

(135,425 posts)
5. I had neighbors with two kids who never married, they lived together under the same roof, though.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:12 AM
Dec 2012

In fact, I knew a couple of families like that--Catholic exiles from Ireland, they were, who had spouses they left behind.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
6. there are always exceptions to the "rule"
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:18 AM
Dec 2012

and in a practical sense, if neighbors say they are married, do you ask to see their marriage certificate?

for statistical research, the "paperwork" is probably part of their data

We had friends in New Mexico who finally got married after 17 years & 3 kids.. we all thought they WERE married until they told us they had slipped away to Vegas & made it legal

muriel_volestrangler

(101,320 posts)
7. "not married but living together" would count as a 'nuclear family'
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 10:47 AM
Dec 2012

It doesn't talk about marriage at all; it does say "a household with both their father and mother".

Only 53% of children were born to married couples in 2010; 31% were to cohabiting but unmarried couples: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/family-demography/families-and-households/2012/cohabitation-rpt.html#tab-39-per-cent-of-opposite-sex-cohabiting-couples-have-dependent-children

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Only two-thirds of Britis...