Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:13 AM Dec 2012

Why don't the lefters on TV talk about removing that Medicare "can't negotiate for prescriptions"?

Remember that provision in the Medicare Part D that Bush and his cohorts passed? The one that actually PREVENTS the govt from negotiating for better prices on prescriptions (the cost of which is shooting thru the roof)?

Why in the hell aren't lefties, and Obama, talking about removing that provision? That would save the Medicare program a LOT of money. Plus, it's just wrong not to negotiate for the cost of prescriptions, when your group is multi-million strong.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why don't the lefters on TV talk about removing that Medicare "can't negotiate for prescriptions"? (Original Post) Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 OP
Because promises were made to Big Pharma. djean111 Dec 2012 #1
you can't bite the hand that feeds you datasuspect Dec 2012 #2
Lefters on TV? Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #3
Here's a post for you to respond to: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022095929 Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #7
I had no notion that you would perceive my post as an attack. Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #9
You cannot mount an accurate argument using inaccurate terms. scarletwoman Dec 2012 #10
Central left reteachinwi Dec 2012 #4
Why not ask the President, who has more chances to explain it daily than any other person? Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #5
My post is my way of asking him. I think some on his team keep an eye on internet blogs.... Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #8
I have been wondering the very same thing rurallib Dec 2012 #6
+1 n/t doc03 Dec 2012 #12
There are no lefters on the tv. nt LWolf Dec 2012 #11
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. Because promises were made to Big Pharma.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:21 AM
Dec 2012

Pretty obvious to me.
No big campaign contributors will be harmed in the making of this movie, er, deal.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
3. Lefters on TV?
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:22 AM
Dec 2012

You mean like the guests on the Noam Chomsky Show?

"What Noam Chomsky Show?" you might ask.

"What lefters on TV?" I might ask in return.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
7. Here's a post for you to respond to: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022095929
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 12:19 PM
Dec 2012

Post your post there.

I'm getting tired of attacks by posters in this forum on the least little terminology I use....even when I directly use terminology used by others, who are RARELY criticized for hte same thing.

So go respond your little retort, which avoids the subject matter of the OP, to the other post this time.

If you don't want to, I'll be glad to post there for you, using your name...that you disapprove of questions posed as to why supposedly liberals on tv don't or do say certain things.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
9. I had no notion that you would perceive my post as an attack.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 12:42 PM
Dec 2012

Really, I agree with you that the voice of the left isn't being heard, and the questions you raise aren't being asked there. I was just trying to point out that we have no leftist representation in TV. The so-called "left" positions that get any expression at all are actually center-right, and the "center" has been towed so far to the right by the corporate-media tugboats that it's on the shoals, and Nixon's policies now sound like Trotskyism, and Reagan like British Fabianism.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
10. You cannot mount an accurate argument using inaccurate terms.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 12:49 PM
Dec 2012

"Liberal" does NOT equal "Left".

Your OP didn't ask why "supposedly liberals" - which IS an accurate term - on TV don't talk about negotiating prescription prices for Medicare, your OP asked why "lefters" on TV didn't.

Since there are no "lefters" on TV, the question in your OP is non sequitur. Change "lefters" to "so-called liberals" and your OP will then make sense.

 

reteachinwi

(579 posts)
4. Central left
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:43 AM
Dec 2012

I saw my congressman, Tim Walz, on Mrs. Alan Greenspan's T.V. show recently and he did say that changing Medicare part D to a V.A. model would save (hundreds? of) billions every year. The subject was quickly changed and he got the hook.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. Why not ask the President, who has more chances to explain it daily than any other person?
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 11:45 AM
Dec 2012

Also, why not ask him why he is not already speaking about it? Candidate Obama promised to reform that give away to Big Phrama. But when negotiation time came he did not stand up for that promise.
You should ask him why he preserved that give away which harms the elderly and sick.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
8. My post is my way of asking him. I think some on his team keep an eye on internet blogs....
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 12:23 PM
Dec 2012

by his supporters, to keep tabs on the pulse of things.

My senators are Republican, so that doesn't help.

My U.S. House rep is a Democrat, so I could email him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why don't the lefters on ...