Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
113 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Gregory to POTUS on MTP "You gotta talk tough to seniors." (Original Post) nashville_brook Dec 2012 OP
Fuck Gregory Gman Dec 2012 #1
Amen JustAnotherGen Dec 2012 #2
Thank you...... socialist_n_TN Dec 2012 #67
amen, twice. nashville_brook Dec 2012 #3
MTP has lost it's remaining illusion of bi-partisan platfrom. Last Stand Dec 2012 #37
Amen, indeed Berlum Dec 2012 #39
Well put. DirkGently Dec 2012 #40
+100 840high Dec 2012 #77
can't stand him either hopemountain Dec 2012 #108
would a non-biased reporter make such a statement to a sitting President? spanone Dec 2012 #4
He has to say it. Bush already spent it tavernier Dec 2012 #5
What does that dick pull in per year? Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #6
in 2007 he campaigned for an 8-figure salary... nashville_brook Dec 2012 #7
too much, the ugly ape face roguevalley Dec 2012 #88
David Gregory is a disgrace. AndyA Dec 2012 #8
Russert was exactly the same. Richardo Dec 2012 #30
Russert thoroughly disgusted me when he hosted the Democratic debate RoccoR5955 Dec 2012 #44
Russert was never a real reporter imo Rex Dec 2012 #79
Agree totally. Russert was a rethug and his pompous son appacom Dec 2012 #49
Russert was a thousand times worse than Gregory. At least now the program isn't MADem Dec 2012 #101
How about handing over the millions used to fund war Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2012 #9
"Millions"?? Add a ZERO. WinkyDink Dec 2012 #20
A zero? Aerows Dec 2012 #25
seems that the military does what it wants Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2012 #75
All authorizations and appropriations start in the House of Representatives. MADem Dec 2012 #103
Add three or four TransitJohn Dec 2012 #104
And the POTUS response was....? forestpath Dec 2012 #10
Obama's response was to point out that he is throwing seniors under the bus w/chained CPI nashville_brook Dec 2012 #57
That's just what I figured he'd do. And yet people are blaming Gregory. Go figure. forestpath Dec 2012 #70
"David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI" PoliticAverse Dec 2012 #78
in pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term I'm willing to make those decisions DJ13 Dec 2012 #81
+1000 nt abelenkpe Dec 2012 #85
In the face of being fair. It would be fair just let the Bush tax cuts expire for those who really The Wielding Truth Dec 2012 #92
Obama should have called "bullshit" on that Dirty Socialist Dec 2012 #11
oh, but he didn't. instead he used it as an opportunity to "sell" the Chained-CPI nashville_brook Dec 2012 #59
How did Obama respond? Oilwellian Dec 2012 #12
see 5:15 on the video -- he agrees and says Chained-CPI is the gift i give to you nashville_brook Dec 2012 #61
whatever happened to Respect Your Elders? Fuck Off, Gregory! Go work for minimum wage the rest of Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2012 #13
Yeah, I would like to see Dirty Socialist Dec 2012 #15
"You gotta talk tough to the Pentagon."..... Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2012 #14
+1 nashville_brook Dec 2012 #106
OMG wryter2000 Dec 2012 #16
from C&L...with video nashville_brook Dec 2012 #18
Snagged Oilwellian Dec 2012 #22
"I offered to make significant changes to our entitlement programs" forestpath Dec 2012 #24
bingo. nashville_brook Dec 2012 #46
It would make me applaud theKed Dec 2012 #51
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #17
how come there's no tough talk for Wall St., or defense contractors? nashville_brook Dec 2012 #19
And what did the POTUS say? senseandsensibility Dec 2012 #21
he agreed and offered the Chained-CPI as the sort of "tough talk" GOP/Gregory would like nashville_brook Dec 2012 #27
"David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI" PoliticAverse Dec 2012 #45
He also said the public must weigh in and ultimately hold their elected officials accountable. proverbialwisdom Dec 2012 #32
Yes give us one more thing to reverse Oilwellian Dec 2012 #47
precisely. his gift to us is a fight we have no way to win. nashville_brook Dec 2012 #63
Yes, he offered to cut SS benefits, and now will blame us Doctor_J Dec 2012 #105
We already have weighed in Doctor_J Dec 2012 #82
Might have some errors but here's a rush transcript cal04 Dec 2012 #34
^^well done, thanks. nashville_brook Dec 2012 #100
One more for the chipper shredder. kenny blankenship Dec 2012 #23
Someone needs to talk tough to David Gregory. DirkGently Dec 2012 #26
That someone could have been Barack Obama this very morning. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #66
+1 -- instead he agreed. nashville_brook Dec 2012 #98
....and THAT will be the epitaph for the Obama Administration: bvar22 Dec 2012 #109
Social Security is a pot of money Aerows Dec 2012 #28
eggsactly. if the sequester happens, the world won't end. nashville_brook Dec 2012 #33
It really is. Pensions disappeared into 401(k)s for exactly this reason. DirkGently Dec 2012 #35
Yep Aerows Dec 2012 #93
+10000000 nashville_brook Dec 2012 #99
These f***ers! I want SS strong & here for future generations! Little Star Dec 2012 #29
Well what the fuck did the president say? n/t doc03 Dec 2012 #31
What we knew already Oilwellian Dec 2012 #41
Well why is Gregory an asshole for asking the question doc03 Dec 2012 #50
it shows how destructive the Chained-CPI actually is -- nashville_brook Dec 2012 #65
Am I wrong, or will this hurt more women than men retirees? juajen Dec 2012 #73
So Obama admits he will defy Dems and Seniors Doctor_J Dec 2012 #83
MTP used to be my favorite show until he took over, then it went to crap loyalkydem Dec 2012 #36
Then There's Tom Brokaw - Yuck otohara Dec 2012 #38
That should make seniors think twice about listening to faux. jwirr Dec 2012 #42
MTP is NBC nashville_brook Dec 2012 #64
There are millions who do not ever turn on Fox News, thank you. juajen Dec 2012 #76
David Gregory is an elitist prick. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2012 #43
David Gregory: establishment hack FlyByNight Dec 2012 #48
and Obama agrees with him. nashville_brook Dec 2012 #54
This senior is talking tuff to DG. ananda Dec 2012 #52
This senior has called the WH several times and it's righ there in the transcript, forestpath Dec 2012 #72
you haven't been alone in calling, either! nashville_brook Dec 2012 #95
The repubuliKKKans own gregory! yortsed snacilbuper Dec 2012 #53
doin' the dance, the karl rove dance... nashville_brook Dec 2012 #56
Go back to dancing with Karl Rove, you f***ing tool Faygo Kid Dec 2012 #55
All the MSM shows are blaming Democrats for the impasse Pushback at fullthrottle mark eagledove Dec 2012 #58
To which the president responded, "No, david, I don't. Doctor_J Dec 2012 #60
if only that were true. nashville_brook Dec 2012 #62
There's the problem - it's right there. geckosfeet Dec 2012 #68
Yep...you nailed it zeemike Dec 2012 #69
and the Dems are enabling it -- moments ago reported that OUR SIDE traded SS for debt ceiling nashville_brook Dec 2012 #86
Fuck You David Gregory!!! santamargarita Dec 2012 #71
And every dime invested in the market is a dime used by them to further that message. nt raouldukelives Dec 2012 #74
Rich 1% enabler tells our POTUS Rex Dec 2012 #80
And the worst part was.... MotherPetrie Dec 2012 #84
looks like this deal is going to happen -- that giant fucking sound you hear is nashville_brook Dec 2012 #87
I'm getting tired of this mentality of repeatedly attacking seniors AS IF THEY HAD ANYTHING to do Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #89
Obama putting Chained-CPI on the table signals to the GOP that now all SS is "on the table" nashville_brook Dec 2012 #94
It is enough to make me wish THIS guy were still president. (sigh) bvar22 Dec 2012 #110
I know. That's pretty ironic, isn't it? nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #111
Wow....my font in this reply post is YOUR green bold font. How is that possible? Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #112
Obama Makes Gregory Look Like A Fool DallasNE Dec 2012 #90
Video of the full Obama Meet the Press VIDEO dsms0515 Dec 2012 #91
Every MSM interview comes off the same script. pa28 Dec 2012 #96
the greed is insatiable. it's not so much a move to the right, as it is a move to plutocrats nashville_brook Dec 2012 #97
They can imagine what it's like to be affected by the economy, but DirkGently Dec 2012 #113
Fuck you, Gregory. Zoeisright Dec 2012 #102
This is why I don't watch MTP. My TV set would suffer damage inflicted by my rage... CTyankee Dec 2012 #107

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
2. Amen
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 12:33 PM
Dec 2012

The "fiscal cliff" should help take care of that. Regardless of what happens next year - we absolutely cannot continue that rate scheme. I have not paid into social security since June. January 4th it goes up 2% and the Fed can take out that 6% plus some for the entire year. It's not missed when I pay in and our Baby Boomers are going to need that so they don't go cold and hungry.


The rules changed on them circa 1980. It's not their fault that many of them are going to NEED this money for their survival as they age. A total non negotiable as far as I'm concerned.

Last Stand

(472 posts)
37. MTP has lost it's remaining illusion of bi-partisan platfrom.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:32 PM
Dec 2012

Gregory doesn't even hide it. I can't watch that asshole. At least Russet gave it a shot.

It's just another opportunity to hammer home the RW talking points.

Don't give em the ratings.

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
39. Amen, indeed
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:33 PM
Dec 2012

Gregory is just parroting Republlican talking points,. As usual. What a waste he is.

spanone

(135,843 posts)
4. would a non-biased reporter make such a statement to a sitting President?
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 12:41 PM
Dec 2012

oh, david gregory?, nevermind.

AndyA

(16,993 posts)
8. David Gregory is a disgrace.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 12:48 PM
Dec 2012

MTP has been horrible since he took over. Only the guests make it worth watching. Rachel Maddow would be so much better on MTP. At least she can ask intelligent questions and hold guests to inaccurate answers. I can't stand it when a guest lies and then nothing is said to correct it or hold them accountable for their statement.

I think Joy-Ann Reid would be good on MTP, too.

Richardo

(38,391 posts)
30. Russert was exactly the same.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:27 PM
Dec 2012

I watched him give a pass to Cheney and the rest of the Bush crowd until the day he died. He might ask a tough question, but NEVER challenged the answer.

MTP was great when it was a panel of reporters. "The Press" is not one person.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
44. Russert thoroughly disgusted me when he hosted the Democratic debate
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:39 PM
Dec 2012

and his first and only question to Dennis Kucinich was, "Do you believe in UFOs?"
That really got in my craw. WTF does that have to do with being president, I asked myself.
I finally realized that "Press The Meat," is nothing more than more propaganda, as is ALL of the mainstream media.
There IS no news any more, it's ALL propaganda, unless you listen to, and read alternatives.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
79. Russert was never a real reporter imo
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:50 PM
Dec 2012

just another propaganda mouthpiece/enabler for the BFEE. Most of them are just mouthpieces imo.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
101. Russert was a thousand times worse than Gregory. At least now the program isn't
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 04:57 PM
Dec 2012

"Meet the Republicans" and he does give people a chance to respond to his questions, be they bullshit or not. Russert would not only not challenge the GOP, he'd hector the rare Dem he had on and not allow them to formulate a cogent response.

MTP, years ago (decades, really) was a panel with a host; the panel (print and media) would take turns asking questions, the person being interviewed would be allowed to answer each question. The reporters--and often the host--did follow ups on their fellow journalists' questions so it was a well-rounded occasion. Sometimes, the host would do a one-on-one interview with a major newsmaker separate from the panel portion of the show; some of those are real gems.

Here's a beaut of an episode--note some of the scornful questions from the reporters:


Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
75. seems that the military does what it wants
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:26 PM
Dec 2012

bottomless pit. We seem to hand over millions to 'other countries' no bother yet our elderly are the ones that have to pay? I guess JFK wanted to change this a number of years ago but.....

MADem

(135,425 posts)
103. All authorizations and appropriations start in the House of Representatives.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 05:11 PM
Dec 2012

They--not "the military"--hold the checkbook.

Anyone can ask, but it's up to the House to take the initial steps that determine how the money is spent. They CAN say NO.

Eisenhower's commentary re: the military-industrial-Congressional complex are as valid today as when he drafted those remarks.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
78. "David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI"
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:42 PM
Dec 2012
GREGORY: You've got to talk tough to seniors...

PRESIDENT OBAMA: But...

GREGORY: ...don't you about this? And say, something’s got to give?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: ...but I already have, David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI, which sounds real technical but basically makes an adjustment in terms of how inflation is calculated on Social Security. Highly unpopular among Democrats. Not something supported by AARP. But in pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term I'm willing to make those decisions. What I'm not willing to do is to have the entire burden of deficit reduction rest on the shoulders of seniors, making students pay higher student loan rates, ruining our capacity to invest in things like basic research that help our economy grow. Those are the things that I'm not willing to do. And so...

Transcript:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50314590/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts/t/december-president-barack-obama-tom-brokaw-jon-meacham-doris-kearns-goodwin-david-brooks-chuck-todd

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
81. in pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term I'm willing to make those decisions
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:55 PM
Dec 2012

I'm sorry, but Obama is either a total idiot or he's been bought off by his buddy Pete Peterson.

Raise the cap, leave benefits untouched.

Keep the cap where its at, and cut the only income many seniors live on.

Only an idiot would see the second option as the only choice.

The Wielding Truth

(11,415 posts)
92. In the face of being fair. It would be fair just let the Bush tax cuts expire for those who really
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:25 PM
Dec 2012

will not be harmed by it, the upper 4%. That is fair since they have profited unfairly over the last 10 years.

Dirty Socialist

(3,252 posts)
15. Yeah, I would like to see
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:05 PM
Dec 2012

Him tour various retirement homes, talking tough to the old folks. What a tough, courageous American!

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
18. from C&L...with video
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:10 PM
Dec 2012
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/david-gregory-president-obama-youve-gotta-ta


David Gregory to President Obama: You've Gotta' Talk Tough to Seniors, Don't You?

I don't think David Gregory can make it through an interview without pushing the Villagers' favorite theme during these so-called "fiscal cliff" negotiations, which is that Democrats had better be willing to inflict some pain on the elderly and the working class, or they're just not being "serious." He was at it again this Sunday when he asked President Obama about whether he was going to just have to "talk tough" to seniors about Social Security and Medicare.

Of course no such tough talk or pain is ever required of the rich or of our bloated military industrial complex. Gregory also did his best to try to place the blame for Republican obstruction during these negotiations on President Obama's back, asking him "What is it about you, Mr. President, that you think is so hard to say yes to?" About him... really David Gregory? We've got one party that's lost its mind and cares about obstruction above all else and is willing to take us down in flames to get what they want and another party that's willing to bend over backwards to try to negotiate with them, and you want to know why the side that's too willing to compromise hasn't done enough to make the Teahadist happy? Spare me.
 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
24. "I offered to make significant changes to our entitlement programs"
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:17 PM
Dec 2012

That sure puts the lie to those who claim Obama isn't throwing seniors under the bus.

theKed

(1,235 posts)
51. It would make me applaud
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:46 PM
Dec 2012

if Obama gave the real, honest answer when Gregory asks: ""What is it about you, Mr. President, that you think is so hard to say yes to?"

"It's because I'm black."

Response to nashville_brook (Original post)

senseandsensibility

(17,056 posts)
21. And what did the POTUS say?
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:14 PM
Dec 2012

That's an important part of the equation here, you know. David Gregory will shill because a shill's gotta shill, but the President could use this question as a chance to educate the viewers.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
45. "David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI"
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:40 PM
Dec 2012
David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI, which sounds real technical but basically makes an adjustment in terms of how inflation is calculated on Social Security. Highly unpopular among Democrats. Not something supported by AARP. But in pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term I'm willing to make those decisions.

Transcript:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50314590/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts/t/december-president-barack-obama-tom-brokaw-jon-meacham-doris-kearns-goodwin-david-brooks-chuck-todd

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
32. He also said the public must weigh in and ultimately hold their elected officials accountable.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:29 PM
Dec 2012

The clear implication to me is that if some compromise feature the public opposes (chained CPI) passes, THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO GET ON IT, MAKE IT AN ISSUE THAT MATTERS, USE LEVERAGE TO REVERSE IT, although that was not explicitly stated. Great advice!

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
47. Yes give us one more thing to reverse
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:41 PM
Dec 2012

because it appears he's more than willing to force that extra work on us.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
63. precisely. his gift to us is a fight we have no way to win.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:03 PM
Dec 2012

the whole reason to elect representatives is for THEM to fight for us. putting this back on us is cowardly bullshit.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
105. Yes, he offered to cut SS benefits, and now will blame us
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 05:27 PM
Dec 2012

when they are actually made. As if he didn't know going in that we were dead set against the cuts.

Yipes. I am afraid the president fooled me twice. Shame on me.

cal04

(41,505 posts)
34. Might have some errors but here's a rush transcript
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:30 PM
Dec 2012

DAVID GREGORY: You've got to talk tough to seniors--

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: But--

DAVID GREGORY: --don't you about this? And say, something’s got to give?

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: --but I already have, David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI, which sounds real technical but basically makes an adjustment in terms of how inflation is calculated on Social Security. Highly unpopular among Democrats. Not something supported by AARP. But in pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term I'm willing to make those decisions.

What I'm not willing to do is to have the entire burden of deficit reduction rest on the shoulders of seniors, making students pay higher student loan rates, ruining our capacity to invest in things like basic research that help our economy grow. Those are the things that I'm not willing to do. And so--

DAVID GREGORY: Would you commit to that first year of your second term getting significant reform done? Telling Congress, "We've got to do it in--"


PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: No, no, no--

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50314590#.UOB4Vr_ZfUg

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
26. Someone needs to talk tough to David Gregory.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:19 PM
Dec 2012

This is a conversation we shouldn't even be having. Republicans and their rich sponsors can hop around all they want. That doesn't somehow make the crazy, destructive things they want a reasonable proposition.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
109. ....and THAT will be the epitaph for the Obama Administration:
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 09:08 PM
Dec 2012

[font size=4]Oh, What could have been.[/font]

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
28. Social Security is a pot of money
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:25 PM
Dec 2012

That is sitting there, and Wall Street can't wait to steal it. It is as simple as that.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
33. eggsactly. if the sequester happens, the world won't end.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:30 PM
Dec 2012

but it end this particular campaign of the plutocrats. they will have to take another stab at it with a new congress.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
41. What we knew already
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:35 PM
Dec 2012

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: --but I already have, David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI, which sounds real technical but basically makes an adjustment in terms of how inflation is calculated on Social Security. Highly unpopular among Democrats. Not something supported by AARP. But in pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term I'm willing to make those decisions.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
65. it shows how destructive the Chained-CPI actually is --
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:09 PM
Dec 2012

"you want tough talk, I'll give you tough talk. Under my proposal, a senior who turned 60 in 2001 will lose a WHOLE MONTH of benefits per year IF they to live to be 90. but really, few will actually make it that far b/c poverty kills, so no big!"

juajen

(8,515 posts)
73. Am I wrong, or will this hurt more women than men retirees?
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:25 PM
Dec 2012

I need all of my SS and this is distressing me beyond belief. We have not been receiving increases as we should, so our checks are already smaller than they should be; and, with the increase in medical expenses, we get nowhere, not to mention, food prices. Five pound bags of sugar are now four pounds; One pound of coffee is now 12 ounces, etc. They are hitting us from all directions.

I am so disappointed in Obama's acquiescence. I depended on him to do the right thing, and it looks as if the elderly will take this one on the shin; the shin that is already in pain and swelling. God help us! I am too tired to fight.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
83. So Obama admits he will defy Dems and Seniors
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:00 PM
Dec 2012

to kiss up to Wall Street and the Repukes.

He's getting sickening

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
38. Then There's Tom Brokaw - Yuck
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:33 PM
Dec 2012

Tom, since you have all the answers, run for POTUS and kiss the asses of the GOP

FlyByNight

(1,756 posts)
48. David Gregory: establishment hack
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:42 PM
Dec 2012

No doubt he won't need SS when the time comes, so he, simply, doesn't care.

He is, essentially, a spokes"person" for sociopaths and he's paid pretty damn well to vomit forth DC/Wall St.-centric talking point after talking point. I wonder for how much a conscience can be purchased?

Fuck you David Gregory.

 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
72. This senior has called the WH several times and it's righ there in the transcript,
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:25 PM
Dec 2012

Obama doesn't give a good goddam what we think about him cutting SS.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
95. you haven't been alone in calling, either!
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:39 PM
Dec 2012

protecting SS has been a priority since the day after the election b/c it was known to be on the table. a broad coalition of unions and non-profits have been working on this.

mark eagledove

(76 posts)
58. All the MSM shows are blaming Democrats for the impasse Pushback at fullthrottle
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:56 PM
Dec 2012

Candy Crowley "there are noted divisions among the Republicans but I think this masks the REALLY significant divisions between the Democrats" unreal horsesheet. and all her guests deflecting from the Re-blame-icans, MSNBC is saying Obama should do more. Every station has the same message. Those Democrats who blame Obama take note: See what happens when he attacks the guilty party who is backed 100% by the MSM?
I'm still amazed he was reelected with the antidemocracy propoganda thats on the TV 24/7

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
60. To which the president responded, "No, david, I don't.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 01:57 PM
Dec 2012

Seniors who depend on Social Security are American men & women who have worked hard for 4 decades to make this a better country, and now are collecting what we as a nation owe to them. They're plenty tough enough already. The ones I need to talk tough to are the billionaires who got rich, in large measure, off of the labor of SS recipients, and to people like yourself who amke a lot of money shilling for those same billionaires. And that tough talk is coming very soon, as soon as this current deal is finalized. Consider this a head's up".

Oh, well. A guy can dream

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
62. if only that were true.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:01 PM
Dec 2012

these people are bullies with their 8-figure incomes telling us to starve so they can take our money. It's really simple aggression.

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
68. There's the problem - it's right there.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:17 PM
Dec 2012

SS spends way way too much. That money needs to go to the job creators so that.... well... for reasons that any intelligent citizen can understand.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
69. Yep...you nailed it
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:20 PM
Dec 2012

Wall Street sees it as a big pile of money to plunder....and with it they can keep the cprupt forces of the "market" going longer

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
86. and the Dems are enabling it -- moments ago reported that OUR SIDE traded SS for debt ceiling
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:12 PM
Dec 2012

Sam Stein on Twitter -- check HuffPo later, I'm sure he'll blog it.

 

MotherPetrie

(3,145 posts)
84. And the worst part was....
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:00 PM
Dec 2012

OurPOTUS was already perfectly ready and willing to to fuck over old people WITHOUT being told!

Hmph! Shows you just how much respect Gregory has for OurPOTUS!

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
87. looks like this deal is going to happen -- that giant fucking sound you hear is
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:13 PM
Dec 2012

our senior citizens taking "one for the team."

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
89. I'm getting tired of this mentality of repeatedly attacking seniors AS IF THEY HAD ANYTHING to do
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:19 PM
Dec 2012

with the recession OR their benefits have any effect on the deficit.

I think the OP is right....the Republicans have been drooling for years to get their hands on the Social Security Fund. The want to steal it, to own it, to privatize it, to destroy it.

I don't think Obama is one who will fall into the trap of believing the lies. FDR was right...he could see their lies for what they were.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
94. Obama putting Chained-CPI on the table signals to the GOP that now all SS is "on the table"
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:37 PM
Dec 2012

and will be considered core to fixing the debt -- when, in fact, it has nothing to do with the debt.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
110. It is enough to make me wish THIS guy were still president. (sigh)
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 09:14 PM
Dec 2012


The leader of what passes for the "Democratic Party" today is FAR to the Conservative Right of Ronald Reagan on issues like Social Security.... among other issues.




You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their rhetoric, promises, or excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
112. Wow....my font in this reply post is YOUR green bold font. How is that possible?
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 09:21 PM
Dec 2012

I've never seen that before.

Is your "Solidarity99" logo bold green? That 's what it looks like on my end, and that makes the DU parts of this reply bold green font, too (not my text that I'm typing).


This is what I see that's green:

Response to:bvar22 (Reply #110)



Forum or Group:General Discussion (Forum)



Reply title:


DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
90. Obama Makes Gregory Look Like A Fool
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:22 PM
Dec 2012

And is giving him a lesson in economics. From Gregory's reaction he doesn't seem to be able to wrap his hands around the import of the dressing down he is receiving at the hands of the President. Obama understands Gregory's political leanings and is using that against him and Gregory is clueless as to what is going on. It will be interesting to see how the round table reacts to this interview. My guess is that there will be a sharp divide down party lines but that the talking points will not be equally effective.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
96. Every MSM interview comes off the same script.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:39 PM
Dec 2012

The interviewer has to badger his subject with the same "both sides" BS over and over again. Then he has to sprinkle in a little of the fake orthodoxy that Social Security is somehow broken and must be cut because that's the only "serious" thing to do!

Scary that they all seem to be buying into the same fiction.


nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
97. the greed is insatiable. it's not so much a move to the right, as it is a move to plutocrats
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:45 PM
Dec 2012

these 8-figure income talking heads only care about their cocktail party buddies. the rest of us don't exist in any meaningful manner (not being rich, elite, influencers).

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
113. They can imagine what it's like to be affected by the economy, but
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 11:55 AM
Dec 2012

only in a distant, hazy kind of way.

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)
102. Fuck you, Gregory.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 05:10 PM
Dec 2012

Let's have a little "tough talk" for you: you are an incompetent, biased asshole with the brains of a gnat.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
107. This is why I don't watch MTP. My TV set would suffer damage inflicted by my rage...
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 05:50 PM
Dec 2012

sadly, I suspect he'll be on MJ talking about his bold, strong question to POTUS and "how it needed to be said" and Mika will nod and Joe will be all "I love you, man..."
And, sadly, that's when MJ gets zapped by my remote...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Gregory to POTUS on...