General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDavid Gregory to POTUS on MTP "You gotta talk tough to seniors."
Why does everyone want our Social Security, when it adds nothing to the deficit? Could it be that Wall Street sees our Social Security system as the last "real" pile of money to plunder?
Lindsey Graham to seniors: hand over your Social Security or we'll shoot the economy in the foot.
http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2012/12/30/video-lindsey-graham-turn-over-social-security-or-i-shoot-the-economy/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Ten Things Everyone Needs to Know about the COLA CUT:
http://strengthensocialsecurity.org/sites/default/files/Ten_Things_Members_of_Congress_Need_to_Know_About_the_COLA%2012.27.12_0.pdf
Gman
(24,780 posts)Raise the cap on the income level FICA cuts off at. Make everyone pay SS and Medicare.
The "fiscal cliff" should help take care of that. Regardless of what happens next year - we absolutely cannot continue that rate scheme. I have not paid into social security since June. January 4th it goes up 2% and the Fed can take out that 6% plus some for the entire year. It's not missed when I pay in and our Baby Boomers are going to need that so they don't go cold and hungry.
The rules changed on them circa 1980. It's not their fault that many of them are going to NEED this money for their survival as they age. A total non negotiable as far as I'm concerned.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)nm
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Last Stand
(472 posts)Gregory doesn't even hide it. I can't watch that asshole. At least Russet gave it a shot.
It's just another opportunity to hammer home the RW talking points.
Don't give em the ratings.
Gregory is just parroting Republlican talking points,. As usual. What a waste he is.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)hopemountain
(3,919 posts)his arrogance is too ugly.
spanone
(135,843 posts)oh, david gregory?, nevermind.
tavernier
(12,392 posts)and now it is up to Rove's flunkies to cover that up.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)I could slap his parents
what is his email, the bastard
AndyA
(16,993 posts)MTP has been horrible since he took over. Only the guests make it worth watching. Rachel Maddow would be so much better on MTP. At least she can ask intelligent questions and hold guests to inaccurate answers. I can't stand it when a guest lies and then nothing is said to correct it or hold them accountable for their statement.
I think Joy-Ann Reid would be good on MTP, too.
Richardo
(38,391 posts)I watched him give a pass to Cheney and the rest of the Bush crowd until the day he died. He might ask a tough question, but NEVER challenged the answer.
MTP was great when it was a panel of reporters. "The Press" is not one person.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)and his first and only question to Dennis Kucinich was, "Do you believe in UFOs?"
That really got in my craw. WTF does that have to do with being president, I asked myself.
I finally realized that "Press The Meat," is nothing more than more propaganda, as is ALL of the mainstream media.
There IS no news any more, it's ALL propaganda, unless you listen to, and read alternatives.
Rex
(65,616 posts)just another propaganda mouthpiece/enabler for the BFEE. Most of them are just mouthpieces imo.
appacom
(296 posts)is a shithead
MADem
(135,425 posts)"Meet the Republicans" and he does give people a chance to respond to his questions, be they bullshit or not. Russert would not only not challenge the GOP, he'd hector the rare Dem he had on and not allow them to formulate a cogent response.
MTP, years ago (decades, really) was a panel with a host; the panel (print and media) would take turns asking questions, the person being interviewed would be allowed to answer each question. The reporters--and often the host--did follow ups on their fellow journalists' questions so it was a well-rounded occasion. Sometimes, the host would do a one-on-one interview with a major newsmaker separate from the panel portion of the show; some of those are real gems.
Here's a beaut of an episode--note some of the scornful questions from the reporters:
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)More like exponents.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)bottomless pit. We seem to hand over millions to 'other countries' no bother yet our elderly are the ones that have to pay? I guess JFK wanted to change this a number of years ago but.....
MADem
(135,425 posts)They--not "the military"--hold the checkbook.
Anyone can ask, but it's up to the House to take the initial steps that determine how the money is spent. They CAN say NO.
Eisenhower's commentary re: the military-industrial-Congressional complex are as valid today as when he drafted those remarks.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)It's more than tens of millions, too.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)PRESIDENT OBAMA: But...
GREGORY: ...don't you about this? And say, somethings got to give?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: ...but I already have, David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI, which sounds real technical but basically makes an adjustment in terms of how inflation is calculated on Social Security. Highly unpopular among Democrats. Not something supported by AARP. But in pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term I'm willing to make those decisions. What I'm not willing to do is to have the entire burden of deficit reduction rest on the shoulders of seniors, making students pay higher student loan rates, ruining our capacity to invest in things like basic research that help our economy grow. Those are the things that I'm not willing to do. And so...
Transcript:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50314590/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts/t/december-president-barack-obama-tom-brokaw-jon-meacham-doris-kearns-goodwin-david-brooks-chuck-todd
DJ13
(23,671 posts)I'm sorry, but Obama is either a total idiot or he's been bought off by his buddy Pete Peterson.
Raise the cap, leave benefits untouched.
Keep the cap where its at, and cut the only income many seniors live on.
Only an idiot would see the second option as the only choice.
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)will not be harmed by it, the upper 4%. That is fair since they have profited unfairly over the last 10 years.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)Because it is BS.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Did he agree as his actions indicate?
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)your life.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)Him tour various retirement homes, talking tough to the old folks. What a tough, courageous American!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Oh wait,...that would be from an Amy Goodman....
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)Did that bastard actually say that.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)David Gregory to President Obama: You've Gotta' Talk Tough to Seniors, Don't You?
I don't think David Gregory can make it through an interview without pushing the Villagers' favorite theme during these so-called "fiscal cliff" negotiations, which is that Democrats had better be willing to inflict some pain on the elderly and the working class, or they're just not being "serious." He was at it again this Sunday when he asked President Obama about whether he was going to just have to "talk tough" to seniors about Social Security and Medicare.
Of course no such tough talk or pain is ever required of the rich or of our bloated military industrial complex. Gregory also did his best to try to place the blame for Republican obstruction during these negotiations on President Obama's back, asking him "What is it about you, Mr. President, that you think is so hard to say yes to?" About him... really David Gregory? We've got one party that's lost its mind and cares about obstruction above all else and is willing to take us down in flames to get what they want and another party that's willing to bend over backwards to try to negotiate with them, and you want to know why the side that's too willing to compromise hasn't done enough to make the Teahadist happy? Spare me.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)That sure puts the lie to those who claim Obama isn't throwing seniors under the bus.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)theKed
(1,235 posts)if Obama gave the real, honest answer when Gregory asks: ""What is it about you, Mr. President, that you think is so hard to say yes to?"
"It's because I'm black."
Response to nashville_brook (Original post)
Post removed
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)senseandsensibility
(17,056 posts)That's an important part of the equation here, you know. David Gregory will shill because a shill's gotta shill, but the President could use this question as a chance to educate the viewers.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)it's around the 5:15 mark on the video.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Transcript:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50314590/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts/t/december-president-barack-obama-tom-brokaw-jon-meacham-doris-kearns-goodwin-david-brooks-chuck-todd
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)The clear implication to me is that if some compromise feature the public opposes (chained CPI) passes, THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO GET ON IT, MAKE IT AN ISSUE THAT MATTERS, USE LEVERAGE TO REVERSE IT, although that was not explicitly stated. Great advice!
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)because it appears he's more than willing to force that extra work on us.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)the whole reason to elect representatives is for THEM to fight for us. putting this back on us is cowardly bullshit.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)when they are actually made. As if he didn't know going in that we were dead set against the cuts.
Yipes. I am afraid the president fooled me twice. Shame on me.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)60% oppose ANY benefit cuts. So Obama is bullshitting us
cal04
(41,505 posts)DAVID GREGORY: You've got to talk tough to seniors--
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: But--
DAVID GREGORY: --don't you about this? And say, somethings got to give?
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: --but I already have, David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI, which sounds real technical but basically makes an adjustment in terms of how inflation is calculated on Social Security. Highly unpopular among Democrats. Not something supported by AARP. But in pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term I'm willing to make those decisions.
What I'm not willing to do is to have the entire burden of deficit reduction rest on the shoulders of seniors, making students pay higher student loan rates, ruining our capacity to invest in things like basic research that help our economy grow. Those are the things that I'm not willing to do. And so--
DAVID GREGORY: Would you commit to that first year of your second term getting significant reform done? Telling Congress, "We've got to do it in--"
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: No, no, no--
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50314590#.UOB4Vr_ZfUg
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)This is a conversation we shouldn't even be having. Republicans and their rich sponsors can hop around all they want. That doesn't somehow make the crazy, destructive things they want a reasonable proposition.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)[font size=4]Oh, What could have been.[/font]
Aerows
(39,961 posts)That is sitting there, and Wall Street can't wait to steal it. It is as simple as that.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)but it end this particular campaign of the plutocrats. they will have to take another stab at it with a new congress.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)and 401K's have been repeatedly decimated.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Little Star
(17,055 posts)doc03
(35,341 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: --but I already have, David, as you know, one of the proposals we made was something called Chain CPI, which sounds real technical but basically makes an adjustment in terms of how inflation is calculated on Social Security. Highly unpopular among Democrats. Not something supported by AARP. But in pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term I'm willing to make those decisions.
doc03
(35,341 posts)when the president agrees? hmmmm
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)"you want tough talk, I'll give you tough talk. Under my proposal, a senior who turned 60 in 2001 will lose a WHOLE MONTH of benefits per year IF they to live to be 90. but really, few will actually make it that far b/c poverty kills, so no big!"
juajen
(8,515 posts)I need all of my SS and this is distressing me beyond belief. We have not been receiving increases as we should, so our checks are already smaller than they should be; and, with the increase in medical expenses, we get nowhere, not to mention, food prices. Five pound bags of sugar are now four pounds; One pound of coffee is now 12 ounces, etc. They are hitting us from all directions.
I am so disappointed in Obama's acquiescence. I depended on him to do the right thing, and it looks as if the elderly will take this one on the shin; the shin that is already in pain and swelling. God help us! I am too tired to fight.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)to kiss up to Wall Street and the Repukes.
He's getting sickening
loyalkydem
(1,678 posts)otohara
(24,135 posts)Tom, since you have all the answers, run for POTUS and kiss the asses of the GOP
jwirr
(39,215 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)juajen
(8,515 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,010 posts)Let him try to live on what many seniors have to.
FlyByNight
(1,756 posts)No doubt he won't need SS when the time comes, so he, simply, doesn't care.
He is, essentially, a spokes"person" for sociopaths and he's paid pretty damn well to vomit forth DC/Wall St.-centric talking point after talking point. I wonder for how much a conscience can be purchased?
Fuck you David Gregory.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)says the Chained-CPI is exactly the kind of "tough talk" Gregory likes.
ananda
(28,865 posts)STFU!
forestpath
(3,102 posts)Obama doesn't give a good goddam what we think about him cutting SS.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)protecting SS has been a priority since the day after the election b/c it was known to be on the table. a broad coalition of unions and non-profits have been working on this.
yortsed snacilbuper
(7,939 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)I despise David Gregory.
mark eagledove
(76 posts)Candy Crowley "there are noted divisions among the Republicans but I think this masks the REALLY significant divisions between the Democrats" unreal horsesheet. and all her guests deflecting from the Re-blame-icans, MSNBC is saying Obama should do more. Every station has the same message. Those Democrats who blame Obama take note: See what happens when he attacks the guilty party who is backed 100% by the MSM?
I'm still amazed he was reelected with the antidemocracy propoganda thats on the TV 24/7
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Seniors who depend on Social Security are American men & women who have worked hard for 4 decades to make this a better country, and now are collecting what we as a nation owe to them. They're plenty tough enough already. The ones I need to talk tough to are the billionaires who got rich, in large measure, off of the labor of SS recipients, and to people like yourself who amke a lot of money shilling for those same billionaires. And that tough talk is coming very soon, as soon as this current deal is finalized. Consider this a head's up".
Oh, well. A guy can dream
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)these people are bullies with their 8-figure incomes telling us to starve so they can take our money. It's really simple aggression.
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)SS spends way way too much. That money needs to go to the job creators so that.... well... for reasons that any intelligent citizen can understand.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Wall Street sees it as a big pile of money to plunder....and with it they can keep the cprupt forces of the "market" going longer
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Sam Stein on Twitter -- check HuffPo later, I'm sure he'll blog it.
santamargarita
(3,170 posts)And kiss my ass you servile scum!!!
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)to fuck over old people...details at 10.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)OurPOTUS was already perfectly ready and willing to to fuck over old people WITHOUT being told!
Hmph! Shows you just how much respect Gregory has for OurPOTUS!
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)our senior citizens taking "one for the team."
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)with the recession OR their benefits have any effect on the deficit.
I think the OP is right....the Republicans have been drooling for years to get their hands on the Social Security Fund. The want to steal it, to own it, to privatize it, to destroy it.
I don't think Obama is one who will fall into the trap of believing the lies. FDR was right...he could see their lies for what they were.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)and will be considered core to fixing the debt -- when, in fact, it has nothing to do with the debt.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The leader of what passes for the "Democratic Party" today is FAR to the Conservative Right of Ronald Reagan on issues like Social Security.... among other issues.
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their rhetoric, promises, or excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I've never seen that before.
Is your "Solidarity99" logo bold green? That 's what it looks like on my end, and that makes the DU parts of this reply bold green font, too (not my text that I'm typing).
This is what I see that's green:
Response to:bvar22 (Reply #110)
Forum or Group:General Discussion (Forum)
Reply title:
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)And is giving him a lesson in economics. From Gregory's reaction he doesn't seem to be able to wrap his hands around the import of the dressing down he is receiving at the hands of the President. Obama understands Gregory's political leanings and is using that against him and Gregory is clueless as to what is going on. It will be interesting to see how the round table reacts to this interview. My guess is that there will be a sharp divide down party lines but that the talking points will not be equally effective.
dsms0515
(1 post)Here's the full interview: http://uneditedpolitics.com/president-obama-full-interview-on-nbcs-meet-the-press-123012/
pa28
(6,145 posts)The interviewer has to badger his subject with the same "both sides" BS over and over again. Then he has to sprinkle in a little of the fake orthodoxy that Social Security is somehow broken and must be cut because that's the only "serious" thing to do!
Scary that they all seem to be buying into the same fiction.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)these 8-figure income talking heads only care about their cocktail party buddies. the rest of us don't exist in any meaningful manner (not being rich, elite, influencers).
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)only in a distant, hazy kind of way.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)Let's have a little "tough talk" for you: you are an incompetent, biased asshole with the brains of a gnat.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)sadly, I suspect he'll be on MJ talking about his bold, strong question to POTUS and "how it needed to be said" and Mika will nod and Joe will be all "I love you, man..."
And, sadly, that's when MJ gets zapped by my remote...