Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUPDATE: Death Threats And Legal Obstacles – Lawyer Withdraws $100M Newtown Lawsuit
As was stated in our earlier report, a Sandy Hook family whose child survived the massacre but was present at the school during the shooting, apparently approached Pinsky in the week following the shooting to take their case. Pinsky, a controversial character who is pictured on his Facebook page in front of a van emblazoned with garish signs advertising his law practice, quickly filed against the state of Connecticut for $100 million. The move drew the ire of many, some of whom saw it as an ill-timed money-grab:
The groundswell of negative response has compelled at least one person to open a Facebook page called Irv Pinsky is a Greedy Scumbag, which is already accruing some fans. [Source]
or
Irv, I always knew you are a bit wacky and enjoy the spot light (sic) but you have gone too far with suing CT over Newtown. You dont have a horse in the race and you are nothing but an opportunist seeking notoriety using dead children. [Source]
The groundswell of negative response has compelled at least one person to open a Facebook page called Irv Pinsky is a Greedy Scumbag, which is already accruing some fans. [Source]
or
Irv, I always knew you are a bit wacky and enjoy the spot light (sic) but you have gone too far with suing CT over Newtown. You dont have a horse in the race and you are nothing but an opportunist seeking notoriety using dead children. [Source]
[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/01/01/update-death-threats-and-legal-obstacles-lawyer-withdraws-100m-newtown-lawsuit/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1460 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UPDATE: Death Threats And Legal Obstacles – Lawyer Withdraws $100M Newtown Lawsuit (Original Post)
sheshe2
Jan 2013
OP
I suspect some of the neighbors had a few thoughts to share with the plaintiffs.
Shrike47
Jan 2013
#2
marybourg
(12,631 posts)1. A case belongs to the plaintiff, not the lawyer. If the
case was withdrawn, the plaintiff withdrew it. It the plaintiff hadn't wished to withdraw it, all the lawyer could do is ask the court's permission (in most states) to withdraw from the case.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)2. I suspect some of the neighbors had a few thoughts to share with the plaintiffs.
Bankrupting the local school system is not going to help heal the wounds.
marybourg
(12,631 posts)3. I agree with you.
obamanut2012
(26,076 posts)4. The plaintiffs should be blamed, not the attorney
*It's THEIR case (or rather, was), not the attorney's.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)5. An ethical attorney
needs to tell a client that he/she won't take their case, if it's wrong in every possible way. This guy was all over the local news, trying to make a name for himself as a champion ambulance chaser.
obamanut2012
(26,076 posts)6. IT is still the plaimtiffs' case
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)7. Well, the way the supposed 'victim'
of the school district was anonymous, and the way this mouthpiece was all over the TV, forgive me for being confused.