General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBirthright citizenship- A few Q&A's from SCOTUS to Sauer. Text from Twitter.
GORSUCH: Do you think Native Americans are birthright citizens under your test?
SAUER: Ah, I think ... so. I have to think that through.
SAUER: We're in a new world where 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who's a US citizen.
JOHN ROBERTS: It's a new world. It's the same Constitution.
Coney Barrett to Sauer: "You say the purpose of the 14th amendment was to put all newly freed slaves on equal footing and so they would be citizens. But that's not textual."
SCOTUS Justice Amy Coney Barrett now appears skeptical of striking down birthright citizenship for illegals
"I can imagine it being messy in some applications."
"What if you don't know who the parents are?"
Gorsuch: Im not sure how much you want to rely on Wong Kim Ark, referring to the watershed SCOTUS precedent protecting birthright citizenship.
He cuttingly refers to the Trump admins reliance on Roman law sources.
Looking predictably bad for Trump.
Barrett: If you're looking at parents and if you're looking at parents domicile, then you have to adjudicate both residents and intent to stay. What if you don't know who the parents are?
Sauer: I think there are marginal cases. That one, I think has the benefit of being addressed in 1401F
Barrett: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. But what about the constitution?
leftstreet
(40,680 posts)Well, that'll go viral
bucolic_frolic
(55,136 posts)Non-citizens would be stuck in a predicament that neither they nor their parents created. We do not get a driver's license where they ask, "Did either your mother or your father drive a car?" We do not jail people for crimes committed by their forebears. This is the most BS case ever. Total BS. All for power, money, show. Trump at TRUMP'S SUPREME COURT THAT HE APPOINTED. He's a con man.