Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 06:07 PM Jan 2013

Reid considers delaying filibuster reform vote

Sen. Harry Reid might be planning to punt on filibuster reform, delaying action by not adjourning the Senate tomorrow, after new members are sworn in, but instead going into recess. In doing that, he would technically keep the first day of Senate business open, to do filibuster reform after the congressional recess that lasts until the week of Jan. 22. Why does he want this delay?

That will buy Reid time for further negotiations with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to see if they can reach a bipartisan agreement, aides said Wednesday.


That would be the same Mitch McConnell who screwed Reid over in fiscal cliff curb negotiations by refusing to work further with him and bypassing him. It's the same McConnell who, as I wrote earlier, has vowed to take the debt ceiling hostage again and again and again. It's also the same McConnell who agreed to a "gentlemen's agreement" on the filibuster back in 2011, and agreement that he happily ignored.

Does Reid remember what he said just eight short months ago?


“If there were ever a time when Tom Udall and Jeff Merkley were prophetic, it’s tonight,” Reid said on the floor. “These two young, fine senators said it was time to change the rules of the Senate, and we didn’t. They were right. The rest of us were wrong—or most of us, anyway. What a shame.”

That hasn't changed. If anything, the last several months of Republican obstruction and McConnell's actions on the fiscal cliff reinforce that. Bipartisan agreements with McConnell are less than worthless; they're destructive.
If this reform is delayed two weeks, Reid should use the time to convince all of the members of his caucus to support real reform. He shouldn't be wasting his time on McConnell.

Tell Sen. Reid that real filibuster reform has to happen. Call him at 202-224-3542.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/02/1175785/-Reid-considers-delaying-filibuster-reform-nbsp-vote
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reid considers delaying filibuster reform vote (Original Post) Playinghardball Jan 2013 OP
so... he's filibustering filibuster reform? unblock Jan 2013 #1
called! Message to Reform sent! TeamPooka Jan 2013 #2
"That will buy Reid time for further negotiations with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell" PoliticAverse Jan 2013 #3
Weclome to the New Year Doctor_J Jan 2013 #4
Bullshit! eom Purveyor Jan 2013 #5
Right! kentuck Jan 2013 #6
We need 51 votes and the use of the nuclear option to get real reform. Lone_Star_Dem Jan 2013 #7
Bullshit. nt bemildred Jan 2013 #8
I'm just wondering if it were McConnell who was the majority leader if he would Cleita Jan 2013 #9
Get a backbone Reid - you've GOT to be kidding me. GardeningGal Jan 2013 #10
Very good news. lindysalsagal Jan 2013 #11
Thinking fondly of 2009-2010 are you? Doctor_J Jan 2013 #12
I think FresnoDemocrat Jan 2013 #13

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
3. "That will buy Reid time for further negotiations with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell"
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 06:10 PM
Jan 2013

Does Biden need to be brought in again to save Reid from himself ?

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
7. We need 51 votes and the use of the nuclear option to get real reform.
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 06:27 PM
Jan 2013

Without the "talking filibuster" this vote is useless.

Get them on board Harry, we need this before the Debt Ceiling is brought up the first of February.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
9. I'm just wondering if it were McConnell who was the majority leader if he would
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 06:30 PM
Jan 2013

be negotiating with Reid over the filibuster rule. I doubt it. If it were McConnell, he would probably raise the number of senators to pass a law to 175 and never even send Reid a note about it.

GardeningGal

(2,211 posts)
10. Get a backbone Reid - you've GOT to be kidding me.
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 06:41 PM
Jan 2013

You haven't learned yet? There isn't any hope for you....omg

lindysalsagal

(20,680 posts)
11. Very good news.
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 07:49 PM
Jan 2013

Especially since it looks as if the GOP will never hold a majority any time soon.

Fingers crossed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reid considers delaying f...