Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(24,717 posts)
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 05:38 PM Wednesday

HAT TRICK! No SLUSH fund, no $1 billion for the ballroom, & "House passes Iran war powers resolution in rebuke to Trump"

House passes Iran war powers resolution in rebuke to Trump

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/03/politics/house-iran-war-powers-vote

The House passed a resolution on Wednesday to limit President Donald Trump’s war powers in Iran, a significant rebuke to Trump and his handling of the conflict.

Democrats have repeatedly forced votes to limit Trump’s war powers in both the House and the Senate – a campaign that has gradually picked up more GOP support in recent weeks.

The measure, known as a concurrent resolution, passed by the House Wednesday must be approved by both chambers, but would not go to the president to be signed.

The vote was 215 to 208 with Republican Reps. Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Tom Barrett and Warren Davidson crossing party lines to support the resolution.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HAT TRICK! No SLUSH fund, no $1 billion for the ballroom, & "House passes Iran war powers resolution in rebuke to Trump" (Original Post) Miles Archer Wednesday OP
Nice UpInArms Wednesday #1
K & R for visibility malaise Wednesday #2
Wonderful. Its about time. Srkdqltr Wednesday #3
I'm thinking they are getting less afraid of him. BlueKota Wednesday #4
Sharks are aware of that first drop of blood in the water. Miles Archer Wednesday #6
I agree! BlueKota Wednesday #7
I think a large part of it ITAL Wednesday #9
They're going to have to move FAR back to the CENTER to get elected, and I don't think they have it in them Miles Archer Wednesday #10
I'm not talking about the ones who may run for president ITAL Wednesday #12
Well, they've also witnessed Trump's treatment of Congress members who fail to give 100% fealty 100% of the time. Miles Archer Wednesday #13
And my point was ITAL Wednesday #15
I am having similar thoughts. wnylib Wednesday #8
I think they are becoming more afraid of their VOTERS... 70sEraVet Wednesday #16
We just need to get that slush fund thing in writing. senseandsensibility Wednesday #5
Suddenly they y are turning. Is this why? Kablooie Wednesday #11
Hopefully Katcat Wednesday #14
Now on to removing the ridiculous "forever immunity for himself, his family, and his businesses." Sogo Wednesday #17
Triple Loser. Sneederbunk Wednesday #18
MaddowBlog-Senate Republicans ignore Trump's pleas, strip ballroom funding from key bill LetMyPeopleVote 11 hrs ago #19
r&k those that love hockey, got the reference MerryBlooms 11 hrs ago #20

BlueKota

(5,574 posts)
4. I'm thinking they are getting less afraid of him.
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 06:09 PM
Wednesday

It could be coincidence or just wishful thinking. I am beginning to wonder though, as more and more evidence about tsf's further medical deterioration are surfacing, whether at least some House and Senate Republicons are thinking they don't have to dance to his tune anymore.

Miles Archer

(24,717 posts)
6. Sharks are aware of that first drop of blood in the water.
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 06:23 PM
Wednesday

I think the question is that if Trump looked and behaved as he did in his first term...still abhorrent, an abomination, but NOT in an alarming state of physical and mental decay, and NOT falling asleep in every meeting, would they be doing this?

I think not.

Because no matter WHO triies to take the rains after his dirt nap, he'll never have the iron grip on him that he still has, and they know it.

ITAL

(1,413 posts)
9. I think a large part of it
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 07:34 PM
Wednesday

Is a lot of the primaries are over (not all states, but many). They're not quite as scared of him now that he won't get someone to primary and challenge them. And after November, at least a few will start looking at '28 and a post Trump GOP.

Miles Archer

(24,717 posts)
10. They're going to have to move FAR back to the CENTER to get elected, and I don't think they have it in them
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 07:45 PM
Wednesday

Look at who's being suggested. Don Jr WANTS IT, but Grampy says he'd rather have PRINCESS IVANKA.

I don't see Trump endorsing Vance or Rubio. He wants the Princess.

Then, there's Tucker Carlson. TUCKER CARLSON, being held up as a potential nominee.

I think what they would like to "SELL" is a return to "REAGAN REPUBLICANS."

Obviously, that won't win over any Democrats, and probably not a majority of Independents. But it would be their way of attempting to wash the stink of the "Trump Decade-Plus" off of them. And if they DO prop up a total knob like Don Jr, well...good luck to them, I guess. They'll need it.

ITAL

(1,413 posts)
12. I'm not talking about the ones who may run for president
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 07:52 PM
Wednesday

I was more meaning folks in Congress since the post I was responding to was about more Republicans crossing the aisle to vote against stuff he wanted. Now that we're largely through primaries, it's started to happen in drips. I feel like once we get into '27 (barring a total red wave catastrophe) that is more likely to happen as they lose the House, and hopefully the Senate. There are a lot of true believers no doubt, but most in Congress just want to be re-elected. Trump's power will probably slowly start to fade as folks look to their '28 re-elections without Trump on the ballot. He may sink some in a primary if they go against him too much I suppose given he loves revenge, but I feel like he will likely check out by early '28. His last year might be on total cruise control.

Miles Archer

(24,717 posts)
13. Well, they've also witnessed Trump's treatment of Congress members who fail to give 100% fealty 100% of the time.
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 07:56 PM
Wednesday

I'm smart enough to know that if I am in a group of people that's getting picked off one at a time, I could be next, especially if I'm behaving the way they're behaving.

A Republican doesn't have to "like" Massie or Cornyn.

They just need to see what Trump's doing to them and understand they could be next.

ITAL

(1,413 posts)
15. And my point was
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 08:00 PM
Wednesday

Primary season is largely over, so he can't hang that sword over many of them now (soon to be all). And by the next time he can in '28, he many not care.

70sEraVet

(5,680 posts)
16. I think they are becoming more afraid of their VOTERS...
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 08:07 PM
Wednesday

than they are of him!
The threats of being 'primaried' by an angry trump don't carry much weight, if the tea leaves reveal that Democrats are going to be elected!

Kablooie

(19,127 posts)
11. Suddenly they y are turning. Is this why?
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 07:51 PM
Wednesday

Do they know something we don’t know?
Maybe the rumors of Trump having a stroke are true.
If Trump is gone all his vanity projects will turn to dust.

Sogo

(7,334 posts)
17. Now on to removing the ridiculous "forever immunity for himself, his family, and his businesses."
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 08:21 PM
Wednesday

nt.

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,946 posts)
19. MaddowBlog-Senate Republicans ignore Trump's pleas, strip ballroom funding from key bill
Thu Jun 4, 2026, 08:28 PM
11 hrs ago

The president said the White House “won’t be a very secure place” unless Congress approved public funds related to the ballroom. GOP senators didn’t care.

Trump said the White House “won’t be a very secure place” unless Congress approved public funds for his ballroom.

The plea didn’t work.

The problem wasn’t procedural; it was the simple fact that too many Senate Republicans weren’t willing to vote for his unpopular idea in an election year.

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-06-03T19:11:04.218Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/senate-republicans-ignore-trumps-pleas-strip-ballroom-funding-from-key-bill

A couple of weeks ago, as part of a weird press conference, Donald Trump again endorsed an effort to secure public funding for “security” measures related to his ballroom vanity project. Asked one day later what would happen if Congress didn’t approve the $1 billion in proposed funds, the president told reporters, “Then the White House won’t be a very secure place.”....

It didn’t work. Bloomberg reported:

Senate Republicans stripped federal funds for Donald Trump’s White House ballroom from a spending package after the money triggered a backlash from lawmakers in both parties.

The removal of the funds Wednesday is a fresh setback for Trump who a day earlier Senate Republicans forced to scrap a $1.8 billion fund to pay allies who claim they were unfairly targeted by the government.


The entire trajectory of this fight has been bizarre for a while. For months, Republican officials in the White House and on Capitol Hill assured the public that the ballroom project would be privately financed. In early May, however, the party’s position changed unexpectedly, and some GOP senators unveiled a package to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, which included a $1 billion provision that, if approved, would spend taxpayer dollars related to the ballroom......

The president kept lobbying, even expressing confidence that lawmakers would eventually give him what he wanted.

Whether Trump realizes this or not, however, his ability to bark orders and have others obey his directives has waned dramatically of late. He’s an unpopular incumbent trying to secure taxpayer money for an unpopular idea in an election year.

Of course, Republicans pulled the provision related to the ballroom — despite the president’s insistence that the White House “won’t be a very secure place.”

That quacking sound you hear in the distance is the sound of an increasingly lame duck.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»HAT TRICK! No SLUSH fund,...