General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA White Plains home listed on the interactive gun map was burglarized Sunday morning...
Last edited Mon Jan 14, 2013, 12:43 PM - Edit history (1)
It's possible that this crime was coincidence or a result of publishing the map; one thing is for sure, posting this information online was irresponsible on part of The Journal News.
It was only a matter of time before a home listed on this page was targeted; coincidentally or not, if the goal is to keep illegal firearms off the streets; publishing the addresses of firearms owners will not help...
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)brush
(53,776 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)My guess is coincidence. But its just a guess based on statistics, I have no knowledge or proof of motive.
Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)Twenty minute ride from White Plains to the Bronx.
RedstDem
(1,239 posts)that would determine whether its just a coinkydink or not..
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)the burglery was unsuccessful in entering the safe or removing the weapon from the home.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)pipoman
(16,038 posts)Burglars aren't usually the brightest bulbs..
riqster
(13,986 posts)The dumb ones get caught, the smart ones don't.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)All too many gun owners don't keep their weapons in safes, and that's pretty common knowledge. It is by no means unreasonable to think it's possible the burglars may have used that idiotic list to target a gun-owning home. Impossible to say for sure unless the burglars admit it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)So, I'm calling bullshit.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Even if that had anything to do with the argument I made (and it doesn't), you didn't actually point up any of that opposing logic.
Never mind...
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)But that still has no relationship whatsoever to the argument presented in my post. If you want to call those "gungeoneers' on what you consider to be their bullshit, why not do it in response to their posts. The points I actually made stand.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)in the home, they wouldn't attack it? Why do people put up those Gun Owner Lawn signs then?
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Paladin
(28,254 posts)Funny, I haven't seen any of those stickers in a long, long time.....
LiberalFighter
(50,912 posts)Readership of newspapers has gone down. Not everyone has access to the internet or knows how to use it properly. Not everyone knows the info was available.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)The vast majority of gun owners don't advertise.
Iggo
(47,552 posts)siligut
(12,272 posts)the burglery was unsuccessful in entering the safe or removing the weapon from the home.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022189305#post6
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)to get into the safe which could have held anything - like jewelry and cash. That they were after the guns is an assumption.
siligut
(12,272 posts)Rifles need a special safe, some safes are the size of a refrigerator.
http://www.ksl.com/?sid=23729453&nid=157&s_cid=popular-3
I don't have a horse in this race. The map may have nothing to do with the break-in and according to the article it is unclear if the thieves knew it was a gun safe.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)paper likely invaded the privacy of those listed but I don't think it rises to actionable behavior. Do gun safes look much different than a regular one?
siligut
(12,272 posts)The size is a big factor and gun safes often just use a key.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Makes no sense. I can see if a neighbor NOT listed was burgled. Your post isn't clear on that. But the fact remains, homes get burglarized all the time. It stands to reason a home, some home, any home, was going to be burglarized in White Plains anyway. It is convenient to link it to "the list," but hardly conclusive of anything.
Indydem
(2,642 posts)Why is this really that hard to understand?
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)If a criminal is already comitted to a crime of burglary; why not maximize it's value to the criminal and steal a firearm?
I'm not a criminal, nor do I know much about illegal resale of fi
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)They can resell them on the street or use them to rob somebody. It's not rocket science.
Atman
(31,464 posts)But these NRA-types keep telling us how they're all safe and keep their guns locked up. You're assuming a burglar just knows where to walk in and find the weapons, and assumes they're just laying unprotected on the coffee table? No trigger locks? No gun cabinets? Not hidden in the closet in a lockbox, just laying out waiting to be stolen.
Hmmm...doesn't sound likely to me.
Indydem
(2,642 posts)Even secured properly with any number of locks, or even in a gun safe, they can still be stolen.
There is no feasible way to lock up a gun in which a determined burglar cannot get to it.
> There is no feasible way to lock up a gun in which a determined burglar cannot get to it.
I never thought I'd see a dyed-in-the-wool gungeneer giving arguments against gun ownership. Maybe you've come to your senses.
treestar
(82,383 posts)For why they aren't afraid the h/o will kill them with the gun.
We've seen the Martin case and the Texas neighbor case. the people allegedly have the gun to protect them from this burglar. So why go where you are likely to be shot? And go there specifically BECAUSE you are more likely to be shot?
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)now if all or most owners were as responsible......well....
frylock
(34,825 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)How many other homes have been burglarized since that article was printed, that were not on the list?
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)End of conversation!
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Supposedly, just the mere thought of guns is supposed to insulate anyone from crime, yet a house that was identified with a gun permit was broken into. NRA logic fail.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)...the house becomes an examined, observed target. The criminals can watch for patterns of behavior and strike when you're not there. Specifically because you own guns and a newspaper was dumb enough to print your name and address.
Replace "guns" with "diamonds" in the newspaper article, you'd get the same thing.
On the other hand, at least, they didn't have the guts to break into an occupied home and risk a confrontation with an armed homeowner.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Again, the burglar would have to assume, or better yet KNOW, where the guns are hidden, and if/how they are locked up, then have a plan to unlock them or remove the 1,000 safe. Just a burglar would have to KNOW you have diamonds and also KNOW that they are not in a safe. Your supposition doesn't wash.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)My point is that there notion that guns are repellant to crime is a flimsy argument and isn't well supported. Criminals don't need a newspaper to decide which houses to break into, in fact, we don't even know if this was related to the article.
Robb
(39,665 posts)If a coincidence, which it is, it's wholly unremarkable and does not promote your thesis.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)Wholly irresponsible action in an attempt to "gotcha" by The Journal.
Robb
(39,665 posts)It's like saying "It doesn't matter whether or not that was a helicopter, I'm certain it's evidence of extraterrestrial life."
Tempest
(14,591 posts)Time to calm down and let the rational part of your brain to take over again.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)WhoIsNumberNone
(7,875 posts)Publishing that map was a stupid idea.
Twice in my old neighborhood houses were broken into. Both times the object was to steal the gun known to reside there. This is how a lot of guns find their way into the hands of criminals- stolen from legal owners. (I know the gun crowd will refuse to make the connection between more guns and more gun crime here) Telling everyone in the world where to steal guns- What could go wrong?
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)Hell, even BJ's Wholesale sells big, heavy, virtually immovable safes for locking up your weapons. If you're claiming to be a "responsible" gun owner, it is your responsibility NOT to leave your gun laying about in such a way as it can be easily burgled. Easy law, with no "restrictions" on guns. You need insurance to drive a car...you can drive without insurance, but if something happens, you are wholly responsible, and you've committed a crime. Case closed.
christx30
(6,241 posts)insurance on your own property. As long as the car doesn't go on public roads, you don't need inspection, registration, or insurance.
If your car is stolen from your property, and you report it, you are not responsible for what a theif does.
"Did you look the car?"
"Yes"
"And where are the keys?"
"On my night stand."
gollygee
(22,336 posts)"A bunch of houses are broken into every day, and one was broken into that happened to be on an interactive map, therefore I'm going to pretend like this is strange or unusual so I have a new excuse to complain about the interactive map, even though it's irrelevant."
Were the guns stolen? Hopefully they're stored in a gun safe or something.
Where I live, the majority of people have guns. There does not need to be an interactive map. If you rob someone, there's at least a 50% chance of there being a gun. I guess this leaves me not really caring about this interactive map. Maybe people break into houses and look for whatever looks like it'll be easy to resell, including guns.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)I believe it is irresponsible and provides the possible tools to criminals and increase the movement of illegal firearms.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)would be limiting how many guns are out there at all. But I'm guessing you aren't worried about illegal firearms that much. You just don't like the idea of your address being on a list.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)I don't own a gun, nor have the desire to own firearm. Ever.
How am I all of a sudden a gun rights supporter?!
Yikes...
Atman
(31,464 posts)So DON'T print names, just provide guns???
You make my head spin.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)You mention head spinning...touche!
Atman
(31,464 posts)The inference is that providing a list of NAMES is a "tool" for a criminal. But in the same thread, we're talking about a criminal breaking into a home (I assume he had the tools to do so) to steal a "tool" to commit another crime. Who provided the "tools," either the guns or the jimmying tools? So, it would appear "lists of names don't cause burglaries, people who read lists of names cause burglaries." Right?
Johonny
(20,841 posts)How to spot a bad argument: It starts with Whether or not it was coincidence
Heads I win, tails you lose arguments are boring, pointless and a waste of the DUers time. This thread should be locked.
Tempest
(14,591 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Earth_First
(14,910 posts)Thanks for the 'outing' folks...
Rather than expressing why this is failed logic, you decided to brand me with being a supporter of guns which is the furthest from the possible truth.
Continue the witch hunt on gun rights supporters, you're doing a great job!
Carry on.
Thanks.
SpartanDem
(4,533 posts)you're a NRA loving/ rightwinger
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)The ideological purity brigade's been feeling their oats lately.
bongbong
(5,436 posts)Wading thru endless posts of the same 20-30 NRA Talking Points, ALL of which were first debunked sometime around 1815, makes Liberals grouchy.
It's your own fault, Delicate Flowers. Try posting something other than long, long debunked illogical appeals to emotion.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Rather than expressing why this is failed logic..."
Your premise is predicated on the logical fallacy, post hoc ergo prompter hoc.
(also, when people disagree with you, try to avoid calling it a 'witch-hunt', it comes across as petulant and melodramatic-- much as is heard on grade school playgrounds)
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)Paladin
(28,254 posts)Orrex
(63,208 posts)How many White Plains homes were burglarized despite not being on the interactive gun map.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)...maybe the gun owners are leaving their doors/windows unlocked, and going away from home for long periods of time. Maybe the gun owners want robberies to occur to prove a point?
Do you have a link?
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Gun ownership should be public record. Don't want your name to be publicized? Then don't own guns.
There is absolutely NO constitutional protections guaranteeing your right to own guns secretly. There IS a first-amendment right to publish anything that is public record.
My right to know if my neighbors are armed supersedes their right to remain anonymous.
If someone has a legitimate fear of having their name published (law enforcement, stalking victims, etc) - then they can get a court order to have their names withheld. But if you have a gun just because you want a gun, then you should be part of the public record.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Sorry. You just don't.
And just because the government collects a record shouldn't mean it is public. Government collects who receives SNAP and Medicare, but those records are rightfully kept private. If you go down the all records of government should be public, then kiss Single Payer Healthcare goodbye.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)There is no other purpose for a gun other than to kill. As such, we should have a right to know if people have death dealers in their houses.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)VOX
(22,976 posts)See link in post below.
VOX
(22,976 posts)WHITE PLAINS As police investigate a burglary over the weekend on Davis Avenue, Public Safety Commissioner David Chong said its premature to suggest that the house was targeted because a resident there is listed on a map of pistol permit holders published last month by The Journal News.
<snip>
We see no pattern of people breaking into homes based on the map, but were certainly paying attention and monitoring that.
The burglary was one of four recent burglaries in the city. The other three residences burglarized do not appear on The Journal News pistol permit holders map.
In the Davis Avenue break-in, a man reported at 9 p.m. Saturday that he returned to his home to find a rear second-floor window had been entered by someone who used a ladder. Jewelry was taken and pry marks were found on what the homeowner described as his gun locker. No weapons were stolen.
<snip>
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)...to have any confidence in confirming or denying that the interactive map had anything to do with this case. It still wouldn't be 100% (since they might lie about it...), but as it stands now it is indeed speculation. If a pattern of targeting those houses begins to emerge over time, it would obviously enhance confidence in calling the map an influence...but it's far too soon for that.
hunter
(38,311 posts)In neighborhoods where people don't have jewelry, gold, silver, or money stashed around the house (because they haven't got any) guns are often one of the few things people have worth stealing. Nobody is breaking into houses to steal CRT television sets, VCRs, and VHS tapes.
I think there should be a national registry of fools who shouldn't have guns. On that list would be people who have brandished or fired their weapons for stupid reasons ("Get off my lawn!" or, "Woohoo, Happy New Year, bang, bang!" ; people who rant about their precious on YouTube; people who have allowed their guns to be stolen in any other manner than, say, a thief cutting into a gun safe with a plasma torch; anyone who has been convicted of a violent crime; etc., etc., etc. None of these people would be allowed to own or handle guns for a period of time related to the severity of their idiocy or criminality, and the list of these gun fools would be public.
I'm cynical about the interactive gun map. I think this was done to generate an ugly fog of talking points.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)What was taken and why didn't the owner blow the burgled to kingdom come?
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)A gun can't protect your property if you aren't home? Ridiculous we all know guns are the solution to every problem.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)I was just pointing out that burglaries are normally conducted when no-one is home. Home invasions on the other hand are usually quite violent affairs.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Not sure what was taken, but apparently the firearms weren't: the owner had proper security (a gun safe) that was tampered with but not opened. As for not shooting the burglars, I'd assume that no one was home. Few burglars target homes when the occupants are home. Burglars and home invaders aren't commonly the same people.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Once you develop a pattern...
Serious.
Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)keep you safe from home invasions?
By the way, I live in White Plains and burglaries happen around here. They happened before the map was published, and they will happen after everyone's forgotten the map. This is a city of 40,000 people and a bedroom-community for NYC. Not exactly the boondocks.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)A burglar breaks in while you are away from the house, like at work. A home invasion is storming into an occupied home. Only one is a danger to you (home owner) physically.
Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)So pretty much if your home is invaded you're gonna be able to get to your responsibly locked-up guns right away and take out the bad guys, huh?
But that's a different topic altogether. The main point is that if the OP's premise is correct and having guns in your home makes you an attractive target, maybe you shouldn't have guns in your home.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)And perhaps it is no one's business to publish the names and addresses of gun owners. It's not public info in most states for this logical reason. You aren't an attractive target if no one knows what you own.
frylock
(34,825 posts)i'm going with coincidence on this one.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Buglers tend to avoid homes with alarms or guns.
The idea is, get in, grab some stuff, get out. And most of all, avoid those who might be inside.
Kaleva
(36,298 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)given week. It happened before the list was published and it happened after the list was published.
Hey! A house was robbed near a Hostess factory. It must be because Hostess is shutting down!
Hey! There was a car accident in that town near where the whales got caught in the ice! It must have been that the whales caused the car accident.
I can't believe this is a conversation.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It would be proof that having a gun and knowing there is a gun does not protect them from crime.