Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,014 posts)
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 07:46 PM Jan 2013

NRA lied: No armed guards at Obama girls’ school

http://americablog.com/2013/01/nra-lied-armed-guards-obama-schoo.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Americablog+%28AMERICAblog+News%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

There’s a reason they’re call gun “NUTS.” The NRA just lies. These guys should consider teaming up with the religious right, considering the audacity of lies they tell.

You might recall that we reported earlier this week that the NRA had launched an ad/Web site targeting President Obama’s children. The ad claimed – falsely, we now know – that the school the Obama girls attend, Sidwell friends, has “11 armed guards.”

In fact, the school has no armed guards of any kind.

Now, you’d think that when the NRA saw that the source for lie was “Breitbart,” a far right blog known for its sensationalism rather than it’s love of veracity, they’d have double checked. Well, if they did, they double checked with Fox News, because it’s a lie.

(end snip)

The article quotes the Washington Post fact checker.

4 Pinocchios for a slashing NRA ad on security at Sidwell Friends School

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/4-pinocchios-for-a-slashing-nra-ad-on-security-at-sidwell-friends-school/2013/01/16/95b2127a-6032-11e2-9940-6fc488f3fecd_blog.html
75 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NRA lied: No armed guards at Obama girls’ school (Original Post) deminks Jan 2013 OP
The NRA wouldn't lie Cali_Democrat Jan 2013 #1
Talk, lie.....lie, talk. Same difference to them. nm rhett o rick Jan 2013 #4
The NRA is evil so they will lie about anything to keep the power they have. hrmjustin Jan 2013 #2
So, in addition to being obnoxious, arrogant, and offensive, the gun nut NRA is also *wrong* alcibiades_mystery Jan 2013 #3
I assumed they were talking about armed Secret Service krawhitham Jan 2013 #5
Nope, the NRA was talking about private armed guards deminks Jan 2013 #9
The ad never said private armed guards krawhitham Jan 2013 #13
The longer ad did CitizenPatriot Jan 2013 #43
The Secret Service who are guarding his children are not armed? former9thward Jan 2013 #6
They don't work for the school and their job is not to protect the other students n/t Fumesucker Jan 2013 #7
Who cares who they work for? former9thward Jan 2013 #12
uh, yeah. they might. The PSD is for the girls. Its not a full on detail with perimeter. I kinda kno pasto76 Jan 2013 #23
Believe your fantasy. former9thward Jan 2013 #24
defending this? CreekDog Jan 2013 #66
Oh my official stalker. former9thward Jan 2013 #70
Lame dodge Capt. Obvious Jan 2013 #73
Another one joins the team! former9thward Jan 2013 #75
Do you think . . . another_liberal Jan 2013 #26
Really don't think that was the posters point. RedCappedBandit Jan 2013 #57
Yes . . . another_liberal Jan 2013 #58
Point being, they don't work for the school. nt RedCappedBandit Jan 2013 #59
OK . . . another_liberal Jan 2013 #60
It doesn't RedCappedBandit Jan 2013 #61
Before you try to stand up for the NRA's honor, ProSense Jan 2013 #8
Don't bother alcibiades_mystery Jan 2013 #14
Anti-rights nuts lie too. former9thward Jan 2013 #25
Standing up for the NRA? Just asking? MightyMopar Jan 2013 #51
I respect the rights in the Constitution, warts and all. former9thward Jan 2013 #52
what are the "warts" in the constitution? CreekDog Jan 2013 #67
I defend all rights granted in the Constitution. former9thward Jan 2013 #71
you said "warts". what are they? CreekDog Jan 2013 #72
Not to be elitist but what educational level have you achieved? former9thward Jan 2013 #74
If you believe that you will believe anything, oldbanjo Jan 2013 #42
I'm uncomfortable with both the ad and this followup story ecstatic Jan 2013 #10
+1,000 malaise Jan 2013 #11
Agree With You Completely. Paladin Jan 2013 #15
I agree with you. Unfortunately FailureToCommunicate Jan 2013 #30
Quakers are obviously un-American. progressoid Jan 2013 #16
Yeah, aren't we just? derby378 Jan 2013 #47
and here the storyline is that, with the media's failure to question a football player ... zbdent Jan 2013 #17
I would be angry if Obama's daughters are *not* protected by armed Secret Service agents. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #18
Me too--only in extreme cases where a threat is in existence. DonRedwood Jan 2013 #22
Quakers are pacifists. defacto7 Jan 2013 #19
Nixon was a Quaker.... OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #20
What has Dick Nixon to do with Sidwell Friend's School? Hekate Jan 2013 #28
Not all Quaker's are pacifists as the poster to whom I responded had posited.... OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #34
Good point, but defacto7 Jan 2013 #33
Nixon was indeed a practicing Quaker and hosted religious services in East Room of White House.... OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #35
Ah.. so there are different branches of Quaker. defacto7 Jan 2013 #41
I hope at least some in the media nail them for this NewJeffCT Jan 2013 #21
Several posters here maintained that falsehood Hekate Jan 2013 #27
I am a skeptic on this pediatricmedic Jan 2013 #29
Wa Po pointed out that most private schools don't have armed security CitizenPatriot Jan 2013 #44
Wrong - Alum here.... Pachamama Jan 2013 #48
I really want this to go away. Too much focus on the girls and the school. mountain grammy Jan 2013 #31
This is a very very inappropriate discussion thread. THIS THREAD SHOULD BE CLOSED IMMEDIATELY! underthematrix Jan 2013 #32
Please explain why you want the thread to be closed. nt. OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #36
Because if we close the thread, B2G Jan 2013 #50
The gun humpers at the NRA lied? RetroLounge Jan 2013 #37
This might be the source of the confusion. Leslie Valley Jan 2013 #38
All the Nervous Rabid Assholes DO is lie. Zoeisright Jan 2013 #39
The NRA is like the GOP, all they can do is lie Rex Jan 2013 #40
Great post, thanks for bringing this NRA lie to light !!!! Unrepentant Fenian Jan 2013 #45
This discussion is a security risk for everyone at the school. leanforward Jan 2013 #46
How do you feel about publishing a map or list of people who own legal permits for firearms? marble falls Jan 2013 #49
You're Comparing Armed Adult Gun Owners To Unarmed School Kids? (nt) Paladin Jan 2013 #53
Unarmed children also live in many of those homes. pnwmom Jan 2013 #54
Not at all. How do you stand on releasing adresses of people who followed the law and legaly own ... marble falls Jan 2013 #56
As If Gun Militants Give A Shit About Childrens' Lives. (nt) Paladin Jan 2013 #62
We aren't talking about that. How do you feel about releasing those addresses of legaly permitted .. marble falls Jan 2013 #63
If I'd Been In Charge Of The Newspaper, I Wouldn't Have Released The Names..... Paladin Jan 2013 #64
And of course not about any sort of repercussions towards those whose addresses were published???? marble falls Jan 2013 #65
Can I Get A Word In Edgewise? Paladin Jan 2013 #69
the bigger surprise would be when the nra told the truth samsingh Jan 2013 #55
Ok, TODAY there might be no armed guards at the school JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2013 #68
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
3. So, in addition to being obnoxious, arrogant, and offensive, the gun nut NRA is also *wrong*
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 07:52 PM
Jan 2013

Color me not surprised.

The sad part is that ALL the gun nut assholes are like this: they lie and deceive at the drop of a hat. They prevent agencies from enforcing law, then insist that enforcement of current law is sufficient. They prevent agencies and academics from conducting research, then insist that you can only speak if you have the very research they have prevented from occurring through bribery, graft, and threats. They turn the substance of conversations toward abstractions, anything at all but what we as a society can do to address the public health threat they pose. They're all fucking liars, and people should remember that when they insist on their "reasonable" and "constructive" conversations.

deminks

(11,014 posts)
9. Nope, the NRA was talking about private armed guards
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:01 PM
Jan 2013

from the WAPO article:

While some news organizations reported that the ad was referencing the Secret Service protection provided to the Obama family — as required by federal law — the longer ad makes it clear that the NRA is specifically referring to the security force at Sidwell Friends.

krawhitham

(4,644 posts)
13. The ad never said private armed guards
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:07 PM
Jan 2013

It did say

"When his kids are protected by armed guards at their school"

I never once assumed they meant private armed guards at Sidwell Friends.


The ad did not say the school was protected by armed guards it said HIS KIDS were protected by armed guards

CitizenPatriot

(3,783 posts)
43. The longer ad did
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:49 PM
Jan 2013

as noted in WaPo, "the longer ad makes it clear that the NRA is specifically referring to the security force at Sidwell Friends."

former9thward

(31,997 posts)
12. Who cares who they work for?
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:05 PM
Jan 2013

They are there. As far as the other students go do you really think anyone is going to get close to that school while Obama's children are there?

pasto76

(1,589 posts)
23. uh, yeah. they might. The PSD is for the girls. Its not a full on detail with perimeter. I kinda kno
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:41 PM
Jan 2013

sidwell friends is in the same scholastic leagues as the boarding school i attended. I saw chelsea from a distance once.

personal security details - having been on them in Iraq - are like a bubble around the VIP. lots of things happen around that bubble, and you just dont care. And as noted above, if anything started going crazy in that school, the Obama girls get whisked off to safety. That leaves a lot of other children behind.

former9thward

(31,997 posts)
24. Believe your fantasy.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:50 PM
Jan 2013

Not counting the SS the school has security people there armed or not. The idea you are trying to promote that the SS are just huddled around the girls' desks and are ignoring everything else is just ridiculous. Why don't you test your theory and go try and walk into the school. Hint - write out your will first.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
26. Do you think . . .
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:59 PM
Jan 2013

Do you really think the President's children should not be, ". . . whisked off to safety," unless everyone else can be taken along?

Do you not realize what those girls' safety means for the whole country? You need to check yourself.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
58. Yes . . .
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 12:05 AM
Jan 2013

Yes, because that is what he posted. In his own words:

". . . if anything started going crazy in that school, the Obama girls get whisked off to safety. That leaves a lot of other children behind."

Hmmmm?

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
60. OK . . .
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 12:16 AM
Jan 2013

OK. But how does that change anything about whether or not we should be providing the best possible protection for the children of our Presidents? I don't get where you are trying to go with this?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
8. Before you try to stand up for the NRA's honor,
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:01 PM
Jan 2013

understand the point.

Still, the ad features an image of NBC newsman David Gregory, whose children also attend Sidwell Friends School, which is a selective Quaker private school. And the longer version of the ad quotes a conservative Web site as saying: “Armed Guards — Good enough for the David Gregory’s kids’ school, not for the rest of us. …(The) school Obama’s daughters attend has 11 armed guards.”


 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
14. Don't bother
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:08 PM
Jan 2013

Gun nuts lie even when they are obviously caught in a lie. They're unethical beyond anything you can contemplate.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
67. what are the "warts" in the constitution?
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 10:28 AM
Jan 2013

you aren't defending gun rights like you think the 2nd amendment is the wart.

based on your post, it would seem more like you find other amendments, like the 14th to be the problem.

former9thward

(31,997 posts)
74. Not to be elitist but what educational level have you achieved?
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 01:09 PM
Jan 2013

"warts and all" is an expression used in the English language. It comes from Oliver Cromwell when he instructed the artist painting him to show the "warts and all". The poster I was replying to (not you of course) had an issue with the 2nd amendment. So that poster feels the 2nd A is a "wart". I defend all the rights granted in the Constitution no matter if people think they are warts or not. Now do you get it? Probably not.

oldbanjo

(690 posts)
42. If you believe that you will believe anything,
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:04 PM
Jan 2013

my girlfriend is a book keeper at a school in SC and they have two armed cops.

ecstatic

(32,701 posts)
10. I'm uncomfortable with both the ad and this followup story
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:01 PM
Jan 2013

We shouldn't be mentioning his daughters' security at all in this context (due to the type of people we're dealing with).

Paladin

(28,254 posts)
15. Agree With You Completely.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:10 PM
Jan 2013

But when I alerted on someone who was speculating about the Sidwell School's security recently, the jury told me to piss off. Go figure.....

FailureToCommunicate

(14,013 posts)
30. I agree with you. Unfortunately
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:21 PM
Jan 2013

the DU jury disagreed. One asked what planet I was from. My response to that juror would be I was on Earth and age 11 when President Kennedy had his head blow apart next to his wife. I was a little older -but still on this planet- when I learned about President Lincoln getting his head shot through while sitting next to his wife. Since then the list of politicians and notable leaders gunned down by cowardly assassins has grown to horrible bloody length. I might ask what unicorn-prancing paradise does the juror live in?

derby378

(30,252 posts)
47. Yeah, aren't we just?
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 08:50 PM
Jan 2013

A faith that stresses egalitarianism, simplicity, social justice, and a peculiar aversion to war. We must be freakin' nuts.

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
17. and here the storyline is that, with the media's failure to question a football player ...
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:22 PM
Jan 2013

that it's A MAJOR CRIME OF PLANETARY PROPORTIONS that someone doesn't research a story ...

but since it perpetuates a RW myth ... there will be NO backlash ...

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
18. I would be angry if Obama's daughters are *not* protected by armed Secret Service agents.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:53 PM
Jan 2013

But I don't think schools should contain armed guards as a matter of course.

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
22. Me too--only in extreme cases where a threat is in existence.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:28 PM
Jan 2013

But I don't have a problem with police making lots and lots of extra drive bys to check things out. That would cut down on speeding in the school areas too so just think how nice and safe it could be.

And the police could be teaching that guns are not OK at school. I like to have a policeman come and visit every year.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
19. Quakers are pacifists.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:13 PM
Jan 2013

I doubt they would want weapons around. Maybe that helps solidify the notion of unarmed guards.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
20. Nixon was a Quaker....
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:25 PM
Jan 2013
Famous Quakers

Based on his conduct of the war in Vietnam as well as his secret bombing campaigns in Laos and Cambodia, it doesn't appear he let his religious background affect his military/political decisions

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
34. Not all Quaker's are pacifists as the poster to whom I responded had posited....
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 12:31 AM
Jan 2013

....maybe you didn't understand his or her post?

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
33. Good point, but
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:24 PM
Jan 2013

not everyone adheres to the tenets of their supposedly chosen religion. He was not considered religious. But I would imagine that a Quaker school would be up on the latest Quakerisms.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
35. Nixon was indeed a practicing Quaker and hosted religious services in East Room of White House....
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 12:53 AM
Jan 2013

....while he was President.

But, his family's brand of the Quaker faith was not the same as what people traditionally consider to be "Quaker". In other words, they were not from a pacifist branch. Nixon stated that he spent months of soul-searching in 1942 to decide whether to become a conscientious objector or join the military. He joined the Navy, completed Officer Candidate School, and was assigned a number of administrative roles in the Pacific Theater before resigning his commission in 1946.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
41. Ah.. so there are different branches of Quaker.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 01:49 AM
Jan 2013

I knew there were different systems between different congregations. I know there are congregations that support atheists and agnostics, so I would suppose there could be varieties that are not pacifist. As for the OP, I would wonder what branch of Quaker the school represents and what their particular belief is on weapons?

Thanks for the history lesson on Nixon. Interesting. I never spent much time on his personal specifics.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
21. I hope at least some in the media nail them for this
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:27 PM
Jan 2013

the NRA spent the whole week standing by their ad.

pediatricmedic

(397 posts)
29. I am a skeptic on this
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:13 PM
Jan 2013

This is a school for the rich and powerful, I would really be surprised if their wasn't an armed security presence besides the SS.

They may not have 11 armed guards in full tactical gear and rifles, but I would imagine some plain cloths and concealed pistols.

CitizenPatriot

(3,783 posts)
44. Wa Po pointed out that most private schools don't have armed security
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:52 PM
Jan 2013

I went to a private school for the very rich (own your own jet types) and there was no armed security at our school.

Pachamama

(16,887 posts)
48. Wrong - Alum here....
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:50 AM
Jan 2013

....on scholarship and financial aid.....middle class average washington dc md area family.....not rich and powerful family....

Went to the wonderful summer camp on the chesapeake too that was associated with them too....was more like the summer camp out of the Bill Murray movie "Meatballs" in terms of facilities....my favorite part was Sunday mornings in the "Dell" after "Honey" made breakfast for the campers....Dell was part of the Quaker tradition of gathering....people would sit in a beautiful wooded area and reflect. Some might stand up and share thoughts, read a poem or even sing a song and play guitar. It was wonderful....Quaker teachings at the camp and school....

Dont make judgements and assumptions about Sidwell Friends, the students or alums....did some wealthy kids attend? Sure. But not all were and in fact the majority were just middle class kids whose parents worked really hard to make sure there kids could have the best education they could. We didnt have any "armed guards" and if while I was there a Presidents daughter or son had attended, they would have been like all other kids and not treated special. But it would never have bothered anyone, nor should it bother anyone that they would have a secret service detail provided to them....

mountain grammy

(26,620 posts)
31. I really want this to go away. Too much focus on the girls and the school.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:22 PM
Jan 2013

It's sickening and scary and I think most people agree with me.

leanforward

(1,076 posts)
46. This discussion is a security risk for everyone at the school.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 08:44 PM
Jan 2013

The NRA can't be trusted by virtue of what they did in that video. My concern is there is a "disconnected" person(s) out there who will try to test the limits. The SS will do what they do for the security and protection of the their principals.

The NRA does not know when to shut up.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
54. Unarmed children also live in many of those homes.
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:17 PM
Jan 2013

Unless the parent who knows how to use the guns (often there's just one) is there 24 hours a day, those children could be as defenseless as any children anywhere.

marble falls

(57,080 posts)
56. Not at all. How do you stand on releasing adresses of people who followed the law and legaly own ...
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 11:40 PM
Jan 2013

firearms? Homes where unarmed children live.

marble falls

(57,080 posts)
63. We aren't talking about that. How do you feel about releasing those addresses of legaly permitted ..
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 09:54 AM
Jan 2013

gun owners? How about releasing the addresses of people who sign petitions? Or people who own Cadillacs?

Paladin

(28,254 posts)
64. If I'd Been In Charge Of The Newspaper, I Wouldn't Have Released The Names.....
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 10:12 AM
Jan 2013

....out of apprehension that some bat-shit crazy gun obsessive would show up and start shooting, taking out as many employees as possible.

Paladin

(28,254 posts)
69. Can I Get A Word In Edgewise?
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 11:02 AM
Jan 2013

Sure, there was a chance that some resident might get harmed by a newspaper-reading, gun-wielding burglar. I just think the chances are ten times more likely that a crazed, revenge-seeking gun obsessive, carrying an assault rifle and a few spare magazines, might stroll into that newspaper office and see how many people he could kill, before doing the usual thing and putting a bullet through what excuse he had in his head for a brain. And I stand by my prior post: If there is one trait which characterizes the gun militancy movement, it is a total disregard for the lives of the victims of gun-related violence, children included. Playing that "Don't you care about the poor kids?" card at this point doesn't carry much weight with me. I've seen way too many DU threads on the latest gun slaughters, where the only thing our resident Gun Enthusiasts care about is the make and caliber of the firearm(s) used; any expression of concern or sympathy for the victims and their families has been dismissed as hysterical emotionalism.

samsingh

(17,595 posts)
55. the bigger surprise would be when the nra told the truth
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:39 PM
Jan 2013

how can any progressive or non-right wing fanatic support the nra anymore?

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,339 posts)
68. Ok, TODAY there might be no armed guards at the school
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 10:35 AM
Jan 2013

because the girls are doing inaugural things instead.

But when they're in school, so is their contingent of armed guards. I don't know how many are in the contingent. Two? Eleven? I would expect the Secret Service to keep that kind of information, well, Secret.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NRA lied: No armed guards...